Literature DB >> 31590155

Impact of Surgical Resection on Survival Outcomes After Chemoradiotherapy in Anal Adenocarcinoma.

Richard Li1, Ashwin Shinde1, Marwan Fakih2, Stephen Sentovich3, Kurt Melstrom3, Rebecca Nelson4, Scott Glaser1, Yi-Jen Chen1, Karyn Goodman5, Arya Amini1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, and no randomized data are available to guide management. Prior retrospective analyses offer differing conclusions on the benefit of surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in these patients. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to analyze survival outcomes in patients undergoing CRT with and without subsequent surgical resection.
METHODS: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the anus diagnosed in 2004 through 2015 were identified using the NCDB. Patients with metastatic disease and survival <90 days were excluded. We analyzed patients receiving CRT and stratified by receipt of surgical resection. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of use of surgery and to form a propensity score-matched cohort. Overall survival (OS) was compared between treatment strategies using Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: We identified 1,747 patients with anal adenocarcinoma receiving CRT, of whom 1,005 (58%) received surgery. Predictors of increased receipt of surgery included age <65 years, private insurance, overlapping involvement of the anus and rectum, N0 disease, and external-beam radiation dose ≥4,000 cGy. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 5-year OS was 61.1% in patients receiving CRT plus surgery compared with 39.8% in patients receiving CRT alone (log-rank P<.001). In multivariate analysis, surgery was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, -0.59; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68; P<.001). This survival benefit persisted in a propensity score-matched cohort (log-rank P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series of anal adenocarcinoma cases to date, treatment with CRT followed by surgery was associated with a significant survival benefit compared with CRT alone in propensity score-matching analysis. Our findings support national guideline recommendations of neoadjuvant CRT followed by resection for patients with anal adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31590155     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  4 in total

1.  Local excision and chemoradiation for clinical node-negative anal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Praveen D Chatani; Dana A Dominguez; John G Aversa; Jeremy L Davis; Jonathan M Hernandez; Lily L Lai; Andrew M Blakely
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome of Adenocarcinoma of the Anal Canal: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Shekhar Gogna; Roberto Bergamaschi; Agon Kajmolli; Mahir Gachabayov; Aram Rojas; David Samson; Rifat Latifi; Xiang Da Dong
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-13

Review 3.  Management and Outcomes in Anal Canal Adenocarcinomas-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vasilis Taliadoros; Henna Rafique; Shahnawaz Rasheed; Paris Tekkis; Christos Kontovounisios
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Anal adenocarcinoma: case report, literature review and comparative survival analysis.

Authors:  Cynthia J Tsay; Thomas Pointer; Jocelyn B Chandler; Anil B Nagar; Petr Protiva
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.