Literature DB >> 31590103

How do supply- and demand-side interventions influence equity in healthcare utilisation? Evidence from maternal healthcare in Senegal.

Divya Parmar1, Aneesh Banerjee2.   

Abstract

The launch of the Millennium Development Goals in 2000, followed by the Sustainable Development Goals in 2015, and the increasing focus on achieving universal health coverage has led to numerous interventions on both supply- and demand-sides of health systems in low- and middle-income countries. While tremendous progress has been achieved, inequities in access to healthcare persist, leading to calls for a closer examination of the equity implications of these interventions. This paper examines the equity implications of two such interventions in the context of maternal healthcare in Senegal. The first intervention on the supply-side focuses on improving the availability of maternal health services while the second intervention, on the demand-side, abolished user fees for facility deliveries. Using three rounds of Demographic Health Surveys covering the period 1992 to 2010 and employing three measures of socioeconomic status (SES) based on household wealth, mothers' education and rural/urban residence - we find that although both interventions increase utilisation of maternal health services, the rich benefit more from the supply-side intervention, thereby increasing inequity, while those living in poverty benefit more from the demand-side intervention i.e. reducing inequity. Both interventions positively influence facility deliveries in rural areas although the increase in facility deliveries after the demand-side intervention is more than the increase after the supply-side intervention. There is no significant difference in utilisation based on mothers' education. Since people from different SES categories are likely to respond differently to interventions on the supply- and demand-side of the health system, policymakers involved in the design of health programmes should pay closer attention to concerns of inequity and elite capture that may unintentionally result from these interventions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access; Emergency obstetric care; Equity; Exemption; Maternal health; Quality of care; Senegal; User fees

Year:  2019        PMID: 31590103     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evidence on result-based financing in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nigel James; Kenny Lawson; Yubraj Acharya
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  Can a National Health Insurance Policy Increase Equity in the Utilization of Skilled Birth Attendants in Indonesia? A Secondary Analysis of the 2012 to 2016 National Socio-Economic Survey of Indonesia.

Authors:  Siti Khadijah Nasution; Yodi Mahendradhata; Laksono Trisnantoro
Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 1.399

3.  How is equity approached in universal health coverage? An analysis of global and country policy documents in Benin and Senegal.

Authors:  Elisabeth Paul; Céline Deville; Oriane Bodson; N'koué Emmanuel Sambiéni; Ibrahima Thiam; Marc Bourgeois; Valéry Ridde; Fabienne Fecher
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-12-17

4.  Ten years of China's new healthcare reform: a longitudinal study on changes in health resources.

Authors:  Jiang Chen; Zhuochen Lin; Xiaoxu Xie; Liangcheng Xiao; Li-An Li; Jing Li; Yuyao Wang; Yu Pan; Jie Yang; Chuncong Xu; Xiaojing Zeng
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Distress financing in coping with out-of-pocket expenditure for maternity care in India.

Authors:  Shalem Balla; Md Illias Kanchan Sk; Mayanka Ambade; Babul Hossain
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.