Literature DB >> 31589863

Placental pathology in live births conceived with in vitro fertilization after fresh and frozen embryo transfer.

Caitlin R Sacha1, Amy L Harris2, Kaitlyn James3, Kristen Basnet4, Taylor S Freret5, John Yeh2, Anjali Kaimal6, Irene Souter2, Drucilla J Roberts4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The availability and use of frozen embryos after ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction has increased with improvement in vitrification techniques and the rise of preimplantation genetic testing. However, there are conflicting data regarding whether obstetric outcomes differ between fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.
OBJECTIVE: To compare placental pathology from live births arising from fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 1140 live births with placental pathology arising from autologous in vitro fertilization cycles with fresh or frozen programmed transfer performed at MGH Fertility Center between 2004 and 2017 was retrospectively reviewed. An experienced placental pathologist categorized the reported placental pathology as anatomic, infectious, inflammatory, or vascular/thrombotic. Our primary outcomes were differences in these placental pathologies between the 2 groups. Patient demographic, cycle, and birth outcomes were compared with the use of χ2 tests, Student t test, or nonparametric tests, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare placental pathology between the fresh and frozen transfer groups.
RESULTS: Of the 1140 cycles included in our analysis, 929 arose from fresh embryo transfers (81.3%) and 211 arose from programmed frozen embryo transfers (18.5%). For both transfer types, the average age of the women at time of treatment was 35 years; mean body mass indices were within the normal range (23.6 kg/m2 for fresh transfers and 23.2 kg/m2 for frozen transfers, P = .26), and mean day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone values were 7.1 and 7.0 IU/L (P = .44), respectively. Deliveries occurred on average at 37.5 and 38.0 weeks' gestational age (P = .04) in the fresh versus frozen transfer group, with similar rates of obstetric complications. However, frozen transfers were more likely to be associated with marginal cord insertion (adjusted odds ratio, 1.87; confidence interval, 1.21, 2.91; P = .01), accessory lobe formation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.96; confidence interval, 1.12, 7.79; P = 0.03), subchorionic thrombi (adjusted odds ratio, 3.72; confidence interval, 1.80, 7.71; P < .001), and fetal vascular malperfusion characteristics with cord anomalies (adjusted odds ratio, 2.34; confidence interval, 1.22, 4.46; P = .01). These trends persisted when we analyzed day 5 transfers alone, and single frozen embryo transfers remained associated with increased rates of subchorionic thrombi compared to single fresh embryo transfers.
CONCLUSION: Pregnancies arising from frozen embryo transfers demonstrated more anatomic and vascular placental pathology than those from fresh transfers in our cohort of patients, despite similar maternal outcomes. More research is needed to explore how these differences in pathology may influence obstetric and perinatal outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; assisted reproduction; embryo; fresh transfer; frozen transfer; pathology; placenta

Year:  2019        PMID: 31589863     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Impact of intramural non-cavity-distorting leiomyoma on placental histopathology and perinatal outcome in singleton live births resulting from in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  Alexander Volodarsky-Perel; Tuyet Nhung Ton Nu; Togas Tulandi; William Buckett; Yaron Gil; Alexandre Machado-Gedeon; Yiming Cui; Jonathan Shaul; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The impact of single-step and sequential embryo culture systems on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Caitlin R Sacha; Daksha Gopal; Chia-Ling Liu; Howard R Cabral; Judy E Stern; Daniela A Carusi; Catherine Racowsky; Charles L Bormann
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 7.490

3.  Follicular fluid anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations and outcomes of in vitro fertilization cycles with fresh embryo transfer among women at a fertility center.

Authors:  Caitlin R Sacha; Jorge E Chavarro; Paige L Williams; Jennifer Ford; LiHua Zhang; Patricia K Donahoe; Irene C Souter; Russ Hauser; David Pépin; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Secretory products of the corpus luteum and preeclampsia.

Authors:  María M Pereira; Monica Mainigi; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  The Kind of Conception Affects the Kind of Cesarean Delivery in Primiparous Women.

Authors:  Evangelia Antoniou; Eirini Orovou; Maria Iliadou; Angeliki Sarella; Ermioni Palaska; Nikolaos Rigas; Georgios Iatrakis; Maria Dagla
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2021-09

Review 6.  The impact of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a review.

Authors:  Jacqueline C Lee; Martina L Badell; Jennifer F Kawwass
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Analysis of the risk of complications during pregnancy in pregnant women with assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective study using registry linkage from 2013 to 2018 in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Mulan He; Xiaoxi Sun; Chunfang Wang; Yilun Sui
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 8.  Assisted Reproductive Technique and Abnormal Cord Insertion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shinya Matsuzaki; Yutaka Ueda; Satoko Matsuzaki; Yoshikazu Nagase; Mamoru Kakuda; Misooja Lee; Michihide Maeda; Hiroki Kurahashi; Harue Hayashida; Tsuyoshi Hisa; Seiji Mabuchi; Shoji Kamiura
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.