Literature DB >> 31589714

A Global Perspective on Phosphorus Management Decision Support in Agriculture: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.

Patrick J Drohan, Marianne Bechmann, Anthony Buda, Faruk Djodjic, Donnacha Doody, Jonathon M Duncan, Antti Iho, Phil Jordan, Peter J Kleinman, Richard McDowell, Per-Erik Mellander, Ian A Thomas, Paul J A Withers.   

Abstract

The evolution of phosphorus (P) management decision support tools (DSTs) and systems (DSS), in support of food and environmental security has been most strongly affected in developed regions by national strategies (i) to optimize levels of plant available P in agricultural soils, and (ii) to mitigate P runoff to water bodies. In the United States, Western Europe, and New Zealand, combinations of regulatory and voluntary strategies, sometimes backed by economic incentives, have often been driven by reactive legislation to protect water bodies. Farmer-specific DSSs, either based on modeling of P transfer source and transport mechanisms, or when coupled with farm-specific information or local knowledge, have typically guided best practices, education, and implementation, yet applying DSSs in data poor catchments and/or where user adoption is poor hampers the effectiveness of these systems. Recent developments focused on integrated digital mapping of hydrologically sensitive areas and critical source areas, sometimes using real-time data and weather forecasting, have rapidly advanced runoff modeling and education. Advances in technology related to monitoring, imaging, sensors, remote sensing, and analytical instrumentation will facilitate the development of DSSs that can predict heterogeneity over wider geographical areas. However, significant challenges remain in developing DSSs that incorporate "big data" in a format that is acceptable to users, and that adequately accounts for catchment variability, farming systems, and farmer behavior. Future efforts will undoubtedly focus on improving efficiency and conserving phosphate rock reserves in the face of future scarcity or prohibitive cost. Most importantly, the principles reviewed here are critical for sustainable agriculture.
© 2019 The Author(s). Re-use requires permission from the publisher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31589714     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2019.03.0107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  2 in total

1.  Tackling unintended consequences of grazing livestock farming: Multi-scale assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs for water pollution mitigation scenarios.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhang; Bruce Griffith; Steve Granger; Hadewij Sint; Adrian L Collins
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 9.297

2.  Potential impacts of a future Nordic bioeconomy on surface water quality.

Authors:  Hannu Marttila; Ahti Lepistö; Anne Tolvanen; Marianne Bechmann; Katarina Kyllmar; Artti Juutinen; Hannah Wenng; Eva Skarbøvik; Martyn Futter; Pirkko Kortelainen; Katri Rankinen; Seppo Hellsten; Bjørn Kløve; Brian Kronvang; Øyvind Kaste; Anne Lyche Solheim; Joy Bhattacharjee; Jelena Rakovic; Heleen de Wit
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 5.129

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.