In this work, we developed a novel strategy to synthesize porous (alumino)silicate materials using a single structure-directing agent composed of an imidazole unit with a hydrophobic tail, namely, 1,2-dimethyl-3-hexadecyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (C16dMImz). A wide range of products such as ordered mesoporous silicas, layered silica-alumina, and hierarchically porous mordenite zeolite were obtained by varying synthesis parameters such as temperature and aluminum concentration. By changing crystallization temperature, we could control the degree of silica condensation and tune the textural and morphological properties of the final materials. By varying the aluminum concentration in the gel, we can obtain mesoporous amorphous silica-alumina or crystalline mordenite zeolite with, respectively, weak and strong Brønsted acid sites. Obtained acidic silica-alumina materials displayed promising performance in catalytic reactions of linear paraffin hydroisomerization and Friedel-Crafts alkylation of benzene with benzyl alcohol.
In this work, we developed a novel strategy to synthesize porous (alumino)silicate materials using a single structure-directing agent composed of an imidazole unit with a hydrophobic tail, namely, 1,2-dimethyl-3-hexadecyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (C16dMImz). A wide range of products such as ordered mesoporous silicas, layered silica-alumina, and hierarchically porous mordenite zeolite were obtained by varying synthesis parameters such as temperature and aluminum concentration. By changing crystallization temperature, we could control the degree of silica condensation and tune the textural and morphological properties of the final materials. By varying the aluminum concentration in the gel, we can obtain mesoporous amorphous silica-alumina or crystalline mordenite zeolite with, respectively, weak and strong Brønsted acid sites. Obtained acidic silica-alumina materials displayed promising performance in catalytic reactions of linear paraffin hydroisomerization and Friedel-Crafts alkylation of benzene with benzyl alcohol.
Porous silicas and their
aluminum-containing analogues are widely used in many technological
settings mainly in adsorption[1] and catalysis[2,3] but also in drug delivery[4] and other
biomedical applications.[5] These materials
can be synthesized with a very high surface area (>800 m2 g–1), and their surface properties can be tuned
to favor catalytic performance, where the shape selective nature of
the micro- and mesoporores is often beneficial.[6]One of the most important contributions to the field
of porous silicas was the discovery of MCM-41, an ordered mesoporous
silica in which cylindrical pores are organized in hexagonal arrays.[7] MCM-41 can be synthesized by condensation of
silica around organic micelles, formed by a cationic surfactants,
e.g., cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), in a basic aqueous medium.[8] Changing the length of the hydrophobic carbon
tail of the surfactant allows tuning the pore size in a range from
2 to 6.5 nm.[9] In turn, variation of the
surfactant concentration leads to different pore arrangements, such
as cubic (MCM-48)[10] and lamellar (MCM-50)[8] phases. By including Al in the synthesis mixture,
Brønsted and/or Lewis acid sites can be introduced in these materials.[11,12] Yet, the apparent Brønsted acidity and thermal stability of
the resulting amorphous mesoporous silica–alumina remain much
lower than of crystalline zeolites.[11,12] Zeolites are
crystalline microporous aluminosilicates and widely used as solid
acid catalysts in the petrochemical and oil refining industry[13] in virtue of their strong acidity, high surface
area, shape selectivity, and high (hydro)thermal stability.[14,15] Unlike mesoporous silicas, the zeolite structure is usually formed
by the condensation of silica around small organic or inorganic cations
that act as structure-directing agents (SDA). The microporous channels
(typically smaller than 1 nm) can impose severe intracrystalline diffusion
limitations[14] which can be overcome by
introducing a secondary level of meso-porosity.[16] For this purpose, many techniques have been developed including
bottom-up and top-down approaches.[17,18]One
particularly interesting approach to introduce this additional porosity
is to use a single cationic surfactant, e.g., mono- or diquaternary
ammonium salts,[19,20] to direct at the same time the
growth of the microporous network and to generate the mesopores/voids
within the zeolite crystal.[21] There are
only a few examples of such successful direct single-template synthesis
of mesoporous zeolite. Complex quaternary ammonium salts[19,22] have been employed to obtain several topologies, e.g., FAU, MOR,
and MFI zeolites. On the other hand, the use of a simple surfactant
(e.g., cetyltrimethylammonium hydroxide (CTAOH))
usually results only in the formation of silicalite-1[23] or ZSM-5.[24] We recently demonstrated
that an inexpensive mono-quaternary ammonium salt, containing a cyclic N-methylpyrrolidinium head group, can be an efficient surfactant
for the direct synthesis of hierarchically porous mordenite (MOR)
zeolite.[25]In this work, we developed
a novel strategy to obtain several ordered mesoporous materials using
1,2-dimethyl-3-hexadecyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide
(C16dMImz) as an organic SDA. Amorphous layered silica
with a high surface area (1200 m2g–1)
was obtained in the absence of aluminum. Addition of a small amount
of Al resulted in a layered silica–alumina (800 m2g–1) with weak acidity, while at higher Al content
a highly crystalline hierarchically porous MOR zeolite (Vmeso 0.08 cm3 g–1) was obtained.
The synthesis procedure was optimized with respect to the aluminum
concentration and temperature, and the obtained materials were characterized
in detail for their chemical, textural, and acidic properties. The
obtained amorphous silica–alumina with weak Brønsted acidity
displayed a promising catalytic performance in the n-hexadecane hydroisomerization reaction. Moreover, strongly Brønsted
acidic mordenite nanorods were found to be efficient for the Friedel–Crafts
alkylation of benzene with benzyl alcohol.
In total,
0.013 mol of 1-bromohexadecane (Sigma-Aldrich, 98.0%) and 0.016 mol
of 1,2-dimethylimidazole (Sigma-Aldrich, 97.0%) were dissolved in
a 50 mL mixture of ethanol (Biosolve, 99.9%) and acetonitrile (Biosolve,
99.9%) (1:5 molar ratio) and heated at 70 °C for 16 h under nitrogen
atmosphere. After evaporation of the solvents and addition of diethyl
ether (Biosolve, 99.5%), a white powder precipitated out of solution.
This solid product was filtered and dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C
for 12 h. The purity of the organic surfactant C16H33-[1,2-dimethyl-3-imidazolium] was analyzed by 1H, 13C, gHSQC, and gCOSY NMR after dissolution in CDCl3 (Figures S1–S4). The product
yield was 75%.
Synthesis of Materials
First, the bromide form of C16dMImz was dissolved in
deionized water at room temperature. To synthesize aluminum-free silica,
sodium silicate (Merck, SiO2 27.0%, Na2O 8.0%)
was used. We added the silica source dropwise to the template solution
while stirring. Aluminum-containing silica was obtained by adding
Al(OH)3 (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.8% reagent grade) to the template
solution under continuous stirring. The molar composition of the synthesis
gel was 0.2 C16dMImz/2.70 Na2O/x Al2O3/10 SiO2/300 H2O (x = 0.0–0.5). After vigorous stirring
for 2 h at ambient temperature, the resulting gel was transferred
into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and heated at temperatures
in the 105–170 °C range for 24–144 h under rotation
(50 rpm). The resulting solid product was filtered, thoroughly washed
with deionized water, and dried in air at 110 °C before calcination
in air at 550 °C for 6 h. Amorphous products were denoted according
to the established morphology: ordered mesoporous silica, OMS; layered
silica, LS; layered silica-alumina, Al-LS. Depending on the Si/Al
ratio of the synthesis gel, as-synthesized mesoporous zeolites were
denoted as mMOR-10 and mMOR-15.
Conventional bulk mordenite reference samples were also prepared without
addition of C16dMImz and denoted as MOR-10 and MOR-15.
Catalyst Preparation
Al-containing samples
were converted to their protonated form by ion exchange, which was
performed in three consecutive steps with an aqueous 1.0 M NH4NO3 solution (1 g of the solid per 100 mL of the
solution, 3 h, 70 °C). Then, the ammonium form of the product
was separated from the solution via centrifugation followed by drying
at 110 °C and calcination at 500 °C for 4 h (heating rate
of 0.5 °C/min) to obtain the final proton form. The proton forms
of the amorphous silica-alumina samples were then loaded with 1 wt
% Pd by incipient wetness impregnation using an aqueous Pd(NH3)4(NO3)2 solution of appropriate
concentration. The resulting catalysts were calcined in air at 450
°C under flowing air for 4 h.
Characterization
Basic Characterization
The crystallinity and phase
purity of all samples was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with
a Bruker D2 Phaser powder diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation.
XRD patterns were obtained in the 2θ range of 5–60°,
with a step size of 0.02°. Small-angle XRD patterns were recorded
in the 2θ range of 0.7–7° with a step size of 0.004°.Textural properties of the samples were investigated using Ar physisorption.
Adsorption and desorption isotherms were recorded at −186 °C
on a Micrometrics ASAP-2020 apparatus. Prior to measurement, the samples
were outgassed at 400 °C to a residual pressure of 5 μbar
for 8 h. The microporous volume was calculated by the t-plot and NLDFT methods using the 3.5–8.0
Å thickness range. The mesoporous volume was determined from
the adsorption branch of the isotherms by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda
(BJH) method. The pore size distribution was derived using the NLDFT method. The total pore volume was recorded at P/P0 = 0.95.The elemental
composition of aluminum-containing products was analyzed by inductively
coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) using a Spectro
CIROS CCD ICP spectrometer with axial plasma viewing. For these measurements,
the samples were dissolved in a 1:1:1 (by weight) mixture of HF (40%)/HNO3 (60%)/H2O.
Electron
Microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were
obtained using a FEI Quanta 200F scanning electron microscope at an
accelerating voltage of 3 kV and a spot size of 4.5. Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) images were recorded on a Tecnai 20 (type
Sphera, FEI, now Thermo Fischer Scientific) operated at 200 kV. TEM
sample preparation involved sonication of the samples in pure ethanol
(Biosolve, extra dry, 99.9%) and applying a few droplets of the suspension
to a 200 mesh Cu TEM grid with a holey carbon support film.
FTIR Spectroscopy
All IR spectra were recorded on a
Bruker Vertex 70v FTIR spectrometer in the range of 4000–400
cm–1. The spectra were recorded at a 2 cm–1 resolution and as an average of 64 scans. The samples were prepared
as thin wafers of ∼10–12 mg with a diameter of 13 mm
and placed inside a controlled-environment transmission IR cell. The
samples were then activated at 550 °C in air flow for 3 h before
cooling the cell to 150 °C and measuring the spectra under vacuum.
Pyridine was then introduced into the IR cell from an ampule kept
at room temperature. After exposure for 10 min to pyridine, the sample
was evacuated over three consecutive 1 h periods at 150 °C, 300
°C, and 500 °C, with a spectrum taken after each hour and
cooled to 150 °C. All spectra were normalized by the weight of
the wafer.
NMR Spectroscopy
Magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) spectra
were recorded at room temperature with a 11.7 Tesla Bruker DMX500
NMR spectrometer. 27Al MAS NMR spectra were recorded at
132 MHz with a spinning rate of 25 kHz and a single excitation pulse
length of 1 μs with a 1 s repetition time. The reference signal
for the 27Al chemical shift was a saturated solution of
Al(NO3)3.
Thermogravimetric
Analysis (TGA)
TGA analysis was performed on a Mettler Toledo
TGA/DSC 1 instrument. About 10 mg of the sample was placed in an alumina
crucible. The uncovered crucible was heated to 750 °C at a rate
5 °C/min in 40 mL/min He and 20 mL/min O2 flow.
H2 Chemisorption
H2 uptake measurements were used to titrate the surface metal atoms
and to provide an estimate of the number of active sites on the catalyst.
A total of 50 mg of the sample was loaded in a quartz reactor. Prior
to dosing, samples were reduced in flowing H2 (1 h, 400
°C, 3 °C/min), evacuated at 450 °C for 1 h to remove
chemisorbed hydrogen, and cooled to 80 °C under vacuum. Analysis
was then performed at 80 °C by collecting an adsorption isotherm
to determine the H2 uptake.
Catalytic
Activity Measurements
Hydroconversion of n-Hexadecane
To determine the catalytic performance
of Pd-loaded silica-alumina in n-hexadecane (n-C16) hydroconversion, the catalyst was pretreated
in a He flow at 200 °C under atmospheric pressure for 1 h followed
by reduction in a pure H2 flow at 60 bar. During reduction,
the temperature was increased from 100 to 400 °C at a rate of
3 °C/min to 400 °C followed by an isothermal period of 1
h. The temperature of the catalyst bed was then lowered to 200 °C,
and the packed bed wetted by the n-C16 feed, maintaining a liquid flow rate of 1 mL/min for 10 min. The
reactor was operated at a H2/n-C16 molar ratio of 20, and a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of
10 gn-C16 gcat–1 h–1. The reaction temperature was increased stepwise
and the reaction equilibrated for 3 h before product sampling. The
reactor effluent was analyzed by a gas chromatograph, which was equipped
with an RTX-1 column and a flame-ionization detector.
Friedel–Crafts Alkylation Reaction of Benzene with Benzyl
Alcohol
The liquid phase Friedel–Crafts alkylation
reaction of benzene (B) with benzyl alcohol (BA) was carried out in
a glass flask equipped with a PTFE septum. The reaction took place
under atmospheric pressure and magnetic stirring at 900 rpm. The flask
was placed in a temperature-controlled oil bath. Before reaction,
0.1 g of catalyst (activated at 500 °C in air for 4 h) was mixed
with benzene (25.7 mL) in an Ar glovebox. After reaching the reaction
temperature of 80 °C and depressurizing the reactor through a
side vessel, the reaction was maintained for 30 min. Then, 0.6 mL
of BA was added and this action was taken as the start of the reaction.
Reaction mixture aliquots of 150 μL were taken at regular time
intervals during the reaction and were separated from the zeolite
catalyst by filtration. The samples were further analyzed by a gas
chromatograph (GC, Shimadzu GC-17A) equipped with a flame ionization
detector (FID) and an Rxi-5 ms capillary column (30-m long, 0.25 mm
i.d., and 0.5 μm thickness).
Results
and Discussion
In this work, we employed an approach, where
only one cationic surfactant (C16dMImz) was used for the
synthesis of different (alumino)silicate products, ranging from amorphous
mesoporous silica to hierarchically porous crystalline zeolite. The
overall strategy and the types of prepared materials are shown in Scheme .
Scheme 1
Strategy in the Synthesis
of Porous Silica(Alumina) and Zeolite Materials
Ordered Mesoporous Silica (OMS)
An ordered
mesoporous silica with hexagonal pore structure was formed after 1
day of hydrothermal synthesis at 105 °C in the presence of C16dMImz (Figure ). Prolonging the synthesis time to 6 days led to the shift of the
XRD peak belonging to the [100] reflection of the hexagonal structure
to a lower angle (from 2θ = 2.77° to 2θ = 2.72°).
This can be related to a slight increase in the pore size. Additionally,
after extending the synthesis time, the [100] peak became less symmetric,
and the [200] reflection at 2θ = 5.42° almost disappeared
after 6 days of synthesis, indicating some structural disordering.
The d-spacings (d100)
were calculated using Bragg’s law after 1 and 6 days synthesis
to be 32.0 and 32.5 Å, respectively. The obtained products were
denoted as OMS (ordered mesoporous silica).
Figure 1
(a) Small and (b) wide
angle XRD patterns of calcined mesoporous silica at different synthesis
times at 105 °C.
(a) Small and (b) wide
angle XRD patterns of calcined mesoporous silica at different synthesis
times at 105 °C.The Ar physisorption
isotherms of the samples are of the type IV shape, typical for mesoporous
materials (Figure a).[26] The calcined products are characterized
by a large total pore volume (∼0.76 cm3 g–1) and BET surface area (∼1100 m2 g–1) (Table S1). In the line with XRD, these
values are slightly lower after 6 days than after 1 day synthesis.
The pore size distributions show relatively uniform mesopores of about
2.9 nm for both products with comparable (∼0.80 nm) wall thickness
(Figure b and Table S1).
Figure 2
(a) Ar physisorption isotherms and (b)
pore size distribution of calcined OMS samples after different hydrothermal
synthesis times at 105 °C. The pore size distributions were calculated
via the NLDFT approach and vertically offset by equal
intervals of 0.003 cm3 g–1 nm–1.
(a) Ar physisorption isotherms and (b)
pore size distribution of calcined OMS samples after different hydrothermal
synthesis times at 105 °C. The pore size distributions were calculated
via the NLDFT approach and vertically offset by equal
intervals of 0.003 cm3 g–1 nm–1.TEM analysis of the OMS-1d and
OMS-6d samples revealed a hexagonal array of pores (Figure b). The pore sizes are in a
narrow range from 2.8 to 3.1 nm determined by inspection of several
TEM images and supported by XRD and Ar physisorption data. In turn,
SEM images revealed the different morphologies of the samples at different
synthesis times (Figure c,d). Agglomerations without a specific shape with a smooth outer
surface were detected for the 1-day sample, while longer synthesis
time leads to the formation of a more “jagged” phase.
Figure 3
TEM and
SEM images of as-synthesized mesoporous silicas after (a,c) 1 day
and (b,d) 6 days of hydrothermal synthesis at 105 °C.
TEM and
SEM images of as-synthesized mesoporous silicas after (a,c) 1 day
and (b,d) 6 days of hydrothermal synthesis at 105 °C.
Layered Silica
The Ar physisorption,
XRD, and SEM results revealed a possible transition of the initially
formed ordered mesoporous silica to a denser phase, the formation
of which was driven by a longer synthesis. Such phase transformations
of MCM-41/MCM-48 to semi-crystalline layered silica during hydrothermal
synthesis have been reported before.[10,27,28] Typically, high temperature (135–150 °C)
and/or longer synthesis (>5 days) are required for this transformation.
Therefore, we investigated the influence of synthesis temperature
(115–170 °C) on the structural changes of the OMS materials.XRD of the obtained materials pointed to a structural evolution
from amorphous silica with a hexagonal structure at 105 °C (Figure a), via several layered
silica intermediates with a different degree of crystallinity at 115–160
°C for 6 days (Figure ), to a crystalline α-quartz phase at 170 °C after
13 days (Figure S5). The obtained layered
silica (LS) at 115–140 °C are characterized by single
diffraction peak at 2θ = 2.28° (d100 = 38.53 Å) at a small angle (Figure a) and the presence of some short-range order,
confirmed by a broad diffraction feature at 2θ ∼ 13.0°
(Figure b). The increase
in temperature to 160 °C resulted in a more ordered material.
The LS (160 °C) material has a similar XRD pattern as magadiitesilicate (reflections at 2θ ∼ 5.2°, 10.4°,
26.0°, and 49.4°).[29,30] A further increase
in temperature led to the development of sharp diffraction lines of
α-quartz,[31−33] with some magadiite phase still being present (Figure b).
Figure 4
(a) Small and (b) wide
angle XRD patterns of calcined silica materials obtained after 6 days
of hydrothermal crystallization at different temperatures.
(a) Small and (b) wide
angle XRD patterns of calcined silica materials obtained after 6 days
of hydrothermal crystallization at different temperatures.Clearly, with increasing temperature, the influence of C16dMImz on the structure of the final silica material diminishes.
This observation is also confirmed by the gradual decrease in the
amount of SDA occluded in the pores with increasing synthesis temperature
(Figure S6). At high temperature, the formation
of layered silicates such as magadiite and α-quartz can occur
without addition of organic molecules[31] in a thermodynamically controlled process.[12]The morphology changes of the obtained materials were examined
by SEM and TEM (Figure and Figure S7). Formation of a layered
silica structure with sheets of 1–1.5 μm in size was
first detected at 115 °C (Figure a and Figure S7a). Increasing
the temperature at the fixed synthesis time led to the gradual formation
of larger agglomerates of thicker sheets at 160 °C (Figure b–e, Figure S7b). Two different phases were detected
at 170 °C; according to XRD, these separate phases were attributed
to magadiite and α-quartz (Figure e). Eventually crystalline α-quartz
was obtained, reverting to the stalk-like phase made up of particles
of 1–1.5 μm size (Figure f), which occurred at higher temperature and during
prolonged synthesis.
Figure 5
SEM images of calcined silica samples after 6 days of
synthesis at different temperatures: (a) 115 °C, (b) 125 °C,
(c) 140 °C, (d) 160 °C, and (e) 170 °C. (f) α-Quartz
synthesized after 13 days at 170 °C.
SEM images of calcined silica samples after 6 days of
synthesis at different temperatures: (a) 115 °C, (b) 125 °C,
(c) 140 °C, (d) 160 °C, and (e) 170 °C. (f) α-Quartz
synthesized after 13 days at 170 °C.Figure depicts the
Ar physisorption isotherms and the NLDFT-derived
pore size distributions of the layered silica samples synthesized
at different temperatures. The LS synthesized in the 115–140
°C range contains micropores (Vmicro ∼ 0.05 cm3g–1), with a size
of around 0.58 nm (Figure b) together with mesopores. These mesopores are quite narrowly
distributed for the sample synthesized at 115 °C (2–5
nm, centered at 3.45 nm) and broadened with increasing temperature
(2–9 nm) (Figure b). At the same time, the layered magadiite precursor (formed at
160 °C) has larger micropores (0.68 nm) and some broadly distributed
additional mesoporosity (Vmeso ∼
0.09 cm3 g–1) (Figure b). Also changing the degree of silica condensation
through varying the synthesis temperature[34,35] led to changes in the textural properties of the obtained silicas, e.g., a reduction in the BET surface area from 1183 m2g–1 at 115 °C to 65 m2g–1 at 160 °C (Table S2). The layered silica products obtained at low temperature (115–125
°C) are promising for adsorption and drug delivery[36] because of the large surface areas (∼1000
m2 g–1) and the narrow distribution of
mesopores.
Figure 6
(a) Ar physisorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution of
calcined layered silica samples after 6 days at different synthesis
temperature. The pore size distributions are calculated via the NLDFT approach and vertically offset by equal intervals
of 0.011 cm3 g–1 nm–1.
(a) Ar physisorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution of
calcined layered silica samples after 6 days at different synthesis
temperature. The pore size distributions are calculated via the NLDFT approach and vertically offset by equal intervals
of 0.011 cm3 g–1 nm–1.
Mesoporous
Silica-Alumina
As a next step, we incorporated Al in the
synthesis gel, in order to introduce acidic properties into the final
materials.[37,38] Initially, we carried out the
same syntheses as above but at a Si/Al gel ratio of 100. A wide range
of products, including ordered amorphous (105 °C) and partially
crystallized materials (115–125 °C), were obtained upon
variation of the synthesis temperature (Figure ). The transformations were similar to those
observed in the siliceous system, except for the formation of a crystalline
mordenite (MOR) phase at 140 °C (Figure b).[39]
Figure 7
(a) Small and
(b) wide angle XRD patterns of calcined silica-alumina obtained after
6 days of hydrothermal synthesis at 105–140 °C.
(a) Small and
(b) wide angle XRD patterns of calcined silica-alumina obtained after
6 days of hydrothermal synthesis at 105–140 °C.SEM analysis (Figure ) demonstrated these morphological changes
with increasing temperature. Two different phases were present at
105 °C (Figure a), with one layered silica-alumina (Al-LS) observed at 125 °C
(Figure c and Figure S8a) supported by XRD results. Further
inspection of the samples by TEM, however, revealed the presence of
the second phase on the edges of the fibrous structure at 125 °C
(Figure S8a, inset). A higher synthesis
temperature of 140 °C was sufficient for the formation a crystalline
mordenite phase with crystal sizes of ∼1–2 μm
and a typical prismatic shape,[40] observed
in both SEM (Figure d) and TEM (Figure S8b) images. This was
possible as mordenite can form with an assistance of either the imidazolium
salts[41,42] or the Na+ cation[43] acting as organic and inorganic SDA, respectively.
Figure 8
SEM images
of calcined silica-alumina samples after 6 days of hydrothermal synthesis
at different temperatures: (a) 105 °C, (b) 115 °C, (c) 125
°C, and (d) 140 °C.
SEM images
of calcined silica-alumina samples after 6 days of hydrothermal synthesis
at different temperatures: (a) 105 °C, (b) 115 °C, (c) 125
°C, and (d) 140 °C.The Ar physisorption isotherms for the obtained silica-alumina are
of the type IV, isotherm as for the previous samples, pointing to
the presence of mesopores (Figure a). The amorphous Al-LS synthesized at 105 °C
had a large surface area (943 m2 g–1)
and contained uniform mesopores of ∼3.3 nm (Figure b). A further temperature increase
led to a higher degree of silica condensation,[34,35] which results in the formation of materials with micropores (d = 0.58 nm, Vmicro = 0.03 cm3 g–1), alongside the mesoporous network.
This process is accompanied by broadening of the mesopore size and
a reduction of the surface area to 820 m2 g–1 at a synthesis temperature of 125 °C (Figure b and Table S3).
Figure 9
(a) Ar physisorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution of
calcined layered silica-alumina samples after 6 days of the synthesis
at different temperatures. The isotherms are offset for clarity by
200 cm3 g−1. The pore size distributions
are calculated via the NLDFT approach and vertically
offset by equal intervals of 0.04 cm3 g–1 nm–1.
(a) Ar physisorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution of
calcined layered silica-alumina samples after 6 days of the synthesis
at different temperatures. The isotherms are offset for clarity by
200 cm3 g−1. The pore size distributions
are calculated via the NLDFT approach and vertically
offset by equal intervals of 0.04 cm3 g–1 nm–1.Despite the high Si/Al ratio in the gel, the final materials contained
a significant amount of Al. Si/Al ratios of 11.7 and 15.3 were determined
by ICP analysis for Al-LS samples prepared at 115 and 125 °C,
respectively. 27Al NMR spectroscopy showed that the Al
atoms were mainly in tetrahedral coordination in the silica matrix
(>65%) (Figure and Table S4), making them potential
Brønsted acid porous catalysts.
Figure 10
27Al MAS spectra of the proton
form of calcined layered silica-alumina samples after 6 days of hydrothermal
synthesis at different temperatures. The spectra are normalized by
the sample weight.
27Al MAS spectra of the proton
form of calcined layered silica-alumina samples after 6 days of hydrothermal
synthesis at different temperatures. The spectra are normalized by
the sample weight.The acidic properties
of the protonated form of Al-LS (125 °C) sample were investigated
by IR spectroscopy (Figure a). Two vibrational bands were observed at 3745 and 3606 cm–1 in the νOH region, which can be
assigned to external silanols (Si–OH) and bridging hydroxyl
groups (Si–OH–Al),[44,45] respectively.
Pyridine was used as a probe molecule to quantify the acid sites.
After pyridine adsorption at 150 °C, the following characteristic
signals appeared in the 1400–1600 cm–1 region:
the band at 1545 cm–1 is due to the interaction
of pyridine with strong Brønsted acid sites (BAS) and the band
at 1455 cm–1 relates to pyridine bonded to Lewis
acid sites (LAS) (Figure b).[46,47] The band at 1490 cm–1 is assigned to pyridine molecules on both types of acid sites.[48,49] After evacuation at 300 °C for 1 h, we could still observe
the presence of chemisorbed pyridine molecules on both types of acid
sites. A BAS concentration of ∼50 μmol g–1 probed by pyridine after evacuation at 300 °C (Table S4) is typical for amorphous silica-alumina
(ASA) materials.[50] However, at 500 °C
nearly no pyridine adsorbed on Brønsted acid sites was detected.
Figure 11
IR spectra
obtained (a) over the protonated form of Al-LS (125 °C) sample
and (b) of pyridine adsorbed on the sample after evacuation at 150,
300, and 500 °C. IR spectra were recorded at 150 °C.
IR spectra
obtained (a) over the protonated form of Al-LS (125 °C) sample
and (b) of pyridine adsorbed on the sample after evacuation at 150,
300, and 500 °C. IR spectra were recorded at 150 °C.Bifunctional catalysts based on a metal such as
Pt or Pd and amorphous silica-alumina are considered as an alternative
to broadly used zeolite ones in the hydroconversion of n-paraffins due to their high surface area and milder Brønsted
acidity suitable for obtaining middle distillates during gas oil hydrocracking.[51,52] Therefore, the catalytic activity of the Al-LS sample was compared
to a commercial amorphous silica-alumina (Com-ASA) in the hydroconversion
of n-hexadecane. The two samples exhibited similar
acidic properties (Table S4). Prior to
the activity tests, the protonated forms of the amorphous silica–alumina
were loaded with 1 wt % Pd followed by calcination at 450 °C
in air. The results of H2 chemisorption after reduction
(Pd dispersion) and the BAS concentration (Table S4) confirmed an adequate balance between the metal and acid
sites. This ratio of metal hydrogenation sites to BAS is sufficiently
high for acid-catalyzed reactions to be rate-controlling in the overall
hydroconversion reaction.[53,54] The conversion of n-hexadecane as a function of temperature is shown in Figure a. The Pd/Al-LS
catalyst displayed a lower apparent activation energy (163 kJ/mol)
than the commercial counterpart (188 kJ/mol) (Figure b).
Figure 12
(a) Conversion of n-hexadecane
as a function of the reaction temperature and (b) Arrhenius plot;
(c) total products selectivity as a function of n-hexadecane conversion for Pd/Al-LS (125 °C) and Pd/Com-ASA
catalysts; and (d) selectivity of cracked products obtained at ∼50% n-hexadecane conversion.
(a) Conversion of n-hexadecane
as a function of the reaction temperature and (b) Arrhenius plot;
(c) total products selectivity as a function of n-hexadecane conversion for Pd/Al-LS (125 °C) and Pd/Com-ASA
catalysts; and (d) selectivity of cracked products obtained at ∼50% n-hexadecane conversion.The samples exhibited similar catalytic behavior, namely, a low selectivity
to cracking products up to n-hexadecane conversion
of 80% (Figure c),
explained by the relatively weak acidity[25] of the amorphous materials (Table S4).
The Pd/Com-ASA displayed a slightly “M-shaped” distribution
of cracked product (Figure d), whereas the Pd/Al-LS sample showed a more symmetric distribution
of cracked products at 50% conversion. The latter distribution is
closer to the cracking pattern expected for the ideal hydrocracking
regime.[55] Taking into account the similar
concentration of Brønsted acid sites (BAS ∼45 μmol/g)
and a proper amount of Pd per acid sites, we associate the improved
catalytic performance of the Pd/Al-LS material to its more beneficial
textural properties. This can also be supported by the smaller size
of the Pd particles (determined by CO chemisorption) for Pd/Al-LS
sample (∼1.1 nm) in comparison with Pd/Com-ASA (∼3.5
nm). A shorter distance between the two catalytic functions can lead
to a lower contribution of secondary cracking on BAS,[52,56] in agreement with the bifunctional hydrocracking mechanism.[57,58] The used Pd/Al-LS and Pd/Com-ASA samples were additionally tested
in their ability to reach 40% conversion at the same temperature as
the fresh one (Figure a). The catalysts showed comparable activity during the second run.
Hierarchical MOR Nanorods
In the previous
section, we observed the formation of mordenite crystals in the sample
synthesized at 140 °C after the introduction of aluminum source
into the gel. In order to obtain a fully crystalline zeolite phase,
a higher Al content is needed because MOR zeolite is typically synthesized
with Si/Al ratio of around 7–10.[59,60] We started
with a Si/Al ratio of 20, which is relevant for crystallization of
mordenite assisted by imidazolium salts[41] and Na+ ions.[61] XRD analysis
showed the typical diffraction pattern of MOR (Figure S9a). However, SEM images revealed the presence of
an additional amorphous phase (Figure S9b). Gradually increasing the Al content to Si/Al ratios of 15 and
10 resulted in the formation of highly crystalline mordenite (Figure S10), denoted as mMOR-15
and mMOR-10, respectively. The complete conversion
into crystalline MOR took place after 6 days of the synthesis at 140
°C as confirmed by SEM and TEM analysis (Figure and Figure ) of the products after 6 days of the synthesis
at 140 °C. Along with these hierarchically porous zeolite materials,
conventional bulk analogues were also synthesized by the same method
but without addition of an organic SDA (MOR-15 and MOR-10).
Figure 13
SEM (a,b,d,e)
and TEM (c,f) images of calcined MOR zeolite samples: (a,c) mMOR-15, (b) mMOR-10, (d,f) MOR-15, and
(e) MOR-10.
Figure 14
(a) Ar physisorption isotherms and (b)
pore size distribution of calcined MOR samples. The isotherms are
offset for clarity by 50 cm3 g–1. The
pore size distributions are calculated via the NLDFT approach and vertically offset by equal intervals of 0.005 cm3 g–1 nm–1.
SEM (a,b,d,e)
and TEM (c,f) images of calcined MOR zeolite samples: (a,c) mMOR-15, (b) mMOR-10, (d,f) MOR-15, and
(e) MOR-10.(a) Ar physisorption isotherms and (b)
pore size distribution of calcined MOR samples. The isotherms are
offset for clarity by 50 cm3 g–1. The
pore size distributions are calculated via the NLDFT approach and vertically offset by equal intervals of 0.005 cm3 g–1 nm–1.Both samples obtained in the presence of C16dMImz
consist of uniform crystals of 2–2.5 μm size (Figure a,b), while the
microporous references appeared differently. MOR-15 had uniform particles
with a smooth surface (4–4.5 μm) and MOR-10 contained
typical prism-shaped crystals together with deformed smaller ones
(Figure d,e). Further,
the TEM images of mMOR-15 revealed a complex structure,
which consisted of stacked nanorods with a width of ∼20 nm,
separated by mesoporous voids (Figure c). An observed lattice distance of 1.33
nm is attributed to the [110] plane (Figure c, insert) and points to nanorods oriented
parallel to the c-axis.[25,62,63] As discussed in our previous work,[25] the hydrophilic head group of the SDA molecule
is likely located in the 8 MR side-pockets or at the interface between
the 8MR and 12MR channels, while the hydrophobic tail is blocking
crystal growth in the a- and b-directions.Ar physisorption results for the products synthesized in the presence
of C16dMImz display the type IV isotherm, whereas the conventional
MOR-15 and MOR-10 samples have the type I isotherm, which is typical
for exclusively microporous materials (Figure a).[64] The hierarchical
mordenite products were highly crystalline (Vmicro 0.11–0.12 cm3 g–1) and characterized by a small volume of mesopores (0.08–0.09
cm3 g–1) combined with a large external
surface area (70.4–79.7 m2 g–1) (Table S5). The pore size distributions
derived from the NLDFT-method showed that uniform
pores of ∼5.5 nm in size were formed in all the mesoporous
MOR materials (Figure b).As typical for MOR, Si/Al ratios of 7 ± 0.5 were observed
for the all materials. 27Al NMR spectra displayed a high
degree of Al incorporation into the framework (>75%) (Figure and Table S6). The spectra also showed a broad peak
at ∼0 ppm, which can be attributed to the extraframework aluminum
(EFAl) species.[65]
Figure 15
27Al MAS
spectra of the proton forms of as-synthesized MOR samples. The spectra
are normalized by the weight of samples.
27Al MAS
spectra of the proton forms of as-synthesized MOR samples. The spectra
are normalized by the weight of samples.Considering the small differences regarding the crystallinity and
textural properties between the hierarchical MOR samples, we selected mMOR-15 for further characterization and catalytic testing.
Along with external silanols (Si–OH) and the bridging hydroxyl
groups (Si–OH–Al) observed in the silica-alumina (Figure a), the mordenite
samples displayed features such as internal silanols at 3733 cm–1 (MOR-15) and the band at 3658 cm–1, assigned to OH groups connected to extraframework aluminum (EFAl)
(Figure ).[66] The fact that the number and apparent strength
of the Brønsted acid sites increased, when compared to the layered
products, was supported by the retention of some BAS, even after pyridine
desorption for 1 h at 500 °C (Figure S11 and Table S7). The decreased amount of BAS (∼30%) available
for a bulk pyridine molecule in the mMOR-15 sample
can be attributed to the reduced number of acid sites located in the
main 12 MR channels, due to a particular Al distribution in the presence
of C16dMImz. We have observed similar behavior in our previous
work, where MOR nanorods were synthesized in the presence of a pyrrolidine-based
mesoporogen.[25]
Figure 16
IR spectra obtained
over MOR samples. (The spectra are normalized to the weight of the
samples.)
IR spectra obtained
over MOR samples. (The spectra are normalized to the weight of the
samples.)Hierarchical zeolites are promising
catalysts for Friedel–Crafts alkylation/acylation reactions
with bulky reactants and/or products due to their strong acidity and
the presence of a second level of porosity, which helps to overcome
the diffusion limitations.[67−69] We evaluated the obtained MOR
zeolites in the model alkylation reaction of benzene (B) with benzyl
alcohol (BA) that leads to diphenylmethane (DPM) in the presence of
acid forms of MOR-15 and mMOR-15 catalysts (Scheme S1). The activity tests were carried out
at 80 °C and under stirring (900 rpm).[70]Figure displays
the conversion of benzyl alcohol as a limiting reagent (B/BA 50 mol/mol)
as a function of the reaction time. While conventional MOR did not
display any BA conversion to the products even after 30 h of the reaction,
the conversion of BA over hierarchical MOR reached 14.5% (selectivity
DPM 58%). Since both catalysts contain a comparable amount of acid
sites, we attribute the very different catalytic behavior to the improved
textural and diffusion properties of the mesoporous MOR sample.
Figure 17
Catalytic
conversion of benzyl alcohol over as-synthesized mordenite samples
at 80 °C.
Catalytic
conversion of benzyl alcohol over as-synthesized mordenite samples
at 80 °C.The one-dimensional channel system
of MOR is characterized by a pore size of 6.5 Å × 7.0 Å.
This size is smaller than necessary for the transition state of the
studied benzylation reaction.[70] This leads
to a low activity of the exclusively microporous MOR catalyst. As
TEM results showed mMOR-15 sample has additional
pores of 5.5 nm running along the c-axis, together
with the microporous channels. The enhanced catalytic activity of
hierarchical mordenite can therefore be explained by the reaction
taking place at the mesopore walls and/or on BAS located in the micropore
openings, accessible for BA through the mesoporous network. This conclusion
is also supported by other studies,[63,70] where hierarchical
mordenite catalysts displayed enhanced performance in similar reactions.
Conclusions
In this work, we described the
synthesis of several mesoporous materials such as amorphous silica
and silica-alumina and crystalline zeolites, using C16dMImz
as a single SDA. Controlling the degree of silica condensation, by
changing the temperature, allowed the tuning of the textural and morphological
properties (surface areas in the 65–1200 m2 g–1 range) of silica. When aluminum is introduced, two
types of acidic materials can be obtained, i.e.,
ordered silica-alumina with weak Brønsted acid sites and hierarchical
mordenite zeolite with strong Brønsted acid sites. These acidic
catalysts displayed promising catalytic performance in the hydroisomerization
of n-hexadecane with Pd/Al-LS and the Friedel–Crafts
alkylation of benzene with benzyl alcohol with MOR zeolite.
Authors: Javier Pérez-Ramírez; Claus H Christensen; Kresten Egeblad; Christina H Christensen; Johan C Groen Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 54.564