Literature DB >> 31589145

Quantitative flow ratio-guided residual functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Jiani Tang1, Yan Lai, Shengxian Tu, Fei Chen, Yian Yao, Zi Ye, Jianyun Gu, Yanhua Gao, Chunyu Guan, Jiapeng Chu, Cheng Yang, Xuebo Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional incomplete revascularisation (IR) is associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during long-term follow-up in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic ability of quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-guided residual functional SYNTAX score (Q-rFSS) and functional IR in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
METHODS: In total, 354 consecutive STEMI patients who successfully underwent PCI were included. Q-rFSS was defined as residual SYNTAX score (rSS) measured only in vessels with QFR ≤0.8. The primary outcome was MACE (a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischaemia-driven revascularisation) at 2 years.
RESULTS: At two-year follow-up, functional IR (Q-rFSS ≥1) showed significantly higher risk for MACE than functional complete revascularisation (CR) (Q-rFSS=0) (functional IR vs CR, 22.0% vs 7.4%; hazard ratio [HR] 3.21; 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.74 to 5.91; p<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of Q-rFSS (0.738, 95% CI: 0.659 to 0.817) was significantly greater than that of rSS (0.648, 95% CI: 0.547 to 0.749). The C-statistic for MACE also increased after the addition of Q-rFSS to the clinical risk factors. Q-rFSS significantly improved risk classification compared with rSS (net reclassification improvement 0.439, 95% CI: 0.201 to 0.548; p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Functional IR is associated with higher risk of MACE during long-term follow-up in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. Q-rFSS has a better prognostic ability for the risk of MACE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31589145     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio, non-hyperaemic pressure indices and fractional flow reserve for the assessment of coronary lesions in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Cameron Dowling; Michael Michail; Jun Michael Zhang; Andrea Comella; Udit Thakur; Robert Gooley; Liam McCormick; Adam J Brown; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-06

2.  Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Jiani Tang; Jiapeng Chu; Hanjing Hou; Yan Lai; Shengxian Tu; Fei Chen; Yian Yao; Zi Ye; Yanhua Gao; Yu Mao; Shaowei Zhuang; Xuebo Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Quantitative Flow Ratio or Angiography for the Assessment of Non-culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Protocol of the Randomized Trial QUOMODO.

Authors:  Helen Ullrich; Maximilian Olschewski; Khelifa-Anis Belhadj; Thomas Münzel; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  QFR Predicts the Incidence of Long-Term Adverse Events in Patients with Suspected CAD: Feasibility and Reproducibility of the Method.

Authors:  Andrea Buono; Annika Mühlenhaus; Tabitha Schäfer; Ann-Kristin Trieb; Julian Schmeißer; Franziska Koppe; Thomas Münzel; Remzi Anadol; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.