Literature DB >> 31588616

Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for Chinese patients over 75 years old: A comparison with a younger cohort.

Jun Zhang1, Zhongyuan Ren1, Songyun Wang2, Jingying Zhang1, Haotian Yang1, Yixing Zheng1, Weilun Meng1, Dongdong Zhao1, Yawei Xu1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) results in satisfactory outcomes for drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, the efficacy and safety of CBA have not yet been tested in the Chinese elderly population. Therefore, this study compared the recurrence of AF and complications of CBA in patients ≥75 years and <75 years.
METHODS: A total of 677 patients (<75 years, n = 550; ≥ 75 years, n = 127) with paroxysmal (n = 603) or persistent (n = 74) non-valvular drug-resistant AF were included. The efficacy was assessed by the recurrence of AF, and the safety was evaluated by peri- and post-procedural complications.
RESULTS: The CHA2DS2-VASc (2.6 ± 1.7 vs 4.8 ± 1.6, P < .01) and HAS-BLED (1.8 ± 0.8 vs 2.0 ± 0.8, P = .01) scores were significantly higher in the elderly group. The instant pulmonary vein isolation success rate was comparable (99.11% younger vs 98.98% older, P = .99). After a mean follow-up time of 12.8 ± 9.6 months, the 1-year freedom from AF rate was 80.6% vs 85.8% in the older and younger groups, respectively, while the survival analysis showed a nonsignificant difference in the rate of freedom from AF (log-rank P = .46). Cox regression showed that age was not a predictive factor for AF recurrence and was not dichotomized (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.868, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.509-1.481; P = .6046) or continuous (HR = 0.990, 95% CI, 0.968-1.012, P = .3642). Similar complications rates were observed, including stroke (1.0% younger vs 0.93% older, P = .95) and major hemorrhagic events (1.2% younger vs 0% elder, P = .25).
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profiles of CBA in patients older than 75 years are comparable with those in younger patients.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese; atrial fibrillation; cryoballoon ablation; efficacy; elderly population; safety

Year:  2019        PMID: 31588616     DOI: 10.1111/jce.14220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  4 in total

1.  Two-Year Outcome From Combining Cryoballoon Ablation and Left Atrial Appendage Closure: CLACBAC Study.

Authors:  Zhongyuan Ren; Jingying Zhang; Songyun Wang; Peng Jia; Xiang Li; Jun Zhang; Rong Guo; Hailing Li; Shuang Li; Haotian Yang; Yixing Zheng; Weilun Meng; Yawei Xu; Dongdong Zhao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-01-11

2.  Safety and Efficacy of Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in relation to the Patients' Age: Results from a Large Real-World Multicenter Observational Project.

Authors:  Luigi Sciarra; Saverio Iacopino; Giuseppe Arena; Claudio Tondo; Paolo Pieragnoli; Giulio Molon; Massimiliano Manfrin; Antonio Curnis; Antonio Dello Russo; Giovanni Rovaris; Giuseppe Stabile; Leonardo Calò; Gabriele Boscolo; Roberto Verlato
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 1.866

3.  Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: A real-world evidence.

Authors:  Tauseef Akhtar; Ryan Wallace; Usama A Daimee; Bhradeev Sivasambu; Erica Hart; Eunice Yang; Joseph E Marine; Ronald Berger; Hugh Calkins; David Spragg
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-11-25

Review 4.  Do Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Have Comparable Ablation Outcomes Compared to Younger Ones? Evidence from Pooled Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Feng Li; Lei Zhang; Li-Da Wu; Zhi-Yuan Zhang; Huan-Huan Liu; Zhen-Ye Zhang; Jie Zhang; Ling-Ling Qian; Ru-Xing Wang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.