Literature DB >> 31588346

Generation of TD50 values for carcinogenicity study data.

Andrew Thresher1, John Paul Gosling2, Richard Williams1.   

Abstract

Carcinogenic potency is a key factor in the understanding of chemical risk assessment. Measures of carcinogenic potency, for example TD50, are instrumental in the determination of metrics such as the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC), acceptable intake (AI) and permitted daily exposure (PDE), which in turn impact on human exposure. The Carcinogenic Potency Data Base (CPDB) has provided a source of study information, complete with calculated TD50 values. However, this is no longer actively updated. An understanding of carcinogenic potency, which can be derived from dose-response data, can be used as part of human risk assessments to generate safety thresholds under which cancer risk is judged to be minimal. The aim of this paper is to produce a transparent methodology for calculating TD50 values from experimental data in a manner consistent with the CPDB. This was then applied across the same data as used in the CPDB and analysis done on the correlation with the CPDB TD50 values. While the two sets of values showed a high level of correlation overall, there were some significant discrepancies. These were predominantly due to a lack of clarity in the CPDB methodology and inappropriate use of a linear model in TD50 calculation where the data was not suitable for such an approach. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31588346      PMCID: PMC6762014          DOI: 10.1039/c9tx00118b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)        ISSN: 2045-452X            Impact factor:   3.524


  7 in total

1.  Potential impurities in drug substances: Compound-specific toxicology limits for 20 synthetic reagents and by-products, and a class-specific toxicology limit for alkyl bromides.

Authors:  J P Bercu; S M Galloway; P Parris; A Teasdale; M Masuda-Herrera; K Dobo; P Heard; M Kenyon; J Nicolette; E Vock; W Ku; J Harvey; A White; S Glowienke; E A Martin; L Custer; R A Jolly; V Thybaud
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 2.  Origin of the TTC values for compounds that are genotoxic and/or carcinogenic and an approach for their re-evaluation.

Authors:  Alan Boobis; Paul Brown; Mark Timothy David Cronin; James Edwards; Corrado Lodovico Galli; Jay Goodman; Abigail Jacobs; David Kirkland; Mirjam Luijten; Cyril Marsaux; Matthew Martin; Chihae Yang; Heli Miriam Hollnagel
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  A tiered approach to threshold of regulation.

Authors:  M A Cheeseman; E J Machuga; A B Bailey
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.023

4.  Calculation of carcinogenic potency from long-term animal carcinogenesis experiments.

Authors:  C Sawyer; R Peto; L Bernstein; M C Pike
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  An empirical comparison of methods used to estimate carcinogenic potency in long-term animal bioassays: lifetable vs summary incidence data.

Authors:  L S Gold; L Bernstein; J Kaldor; G Backman; D Hoel
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1986-02

6.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; C B Sawyer; R Magaw; G M Backman; M de Veciana; R Levinson; N K Hooper; W R Havender; L Bernstein; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  The TD50: a proposed general convention for the numerical description of the carcinogenic potency of chemicals in chronic-exposure animal experiments.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; L Bernstein; L S Gold; B N Ames
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Developing Structure-Activity Relationships for N-Nitrosamine Activity.

Authors:  Kevin P Cross; David J Ponting
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-08

Review 2.  Oxidation of Drugs during Drug Product Development: Problems and Solutions.

Authors:  Alen Gabrič; Žiga Hodnik; Stane Pajk
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.321

3.  Practical and Science-Based Strategy for Establishing Acceptable Intakes for Drug Product N-Nitrosamine Impurities.

Authors:  Krista L Dobo; Michelle O Kenyon; Olivier Dirat; Maria Engel; Andrew Fleetwood; Matthew Martin; Susan Mattano; Alyssa Musso; James Christopher McWilliams; Alexandros Papanikolaou; Patricia Parris; Jessica Whritenour; Shu Yu; Amit S Kalgutkar
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Identification, isolation, structural characterization, in silico toxicity prediction and in vitro cytotoxicity assay of simeprevir acidic and oxidative degradation products.

Authors:  Rasha M Ahmed; Marwa A A Fayed; Mohammed F El-Behairy; Inas A Abdallah
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.036

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.