| Literature DB >> 31588194 |
Katsuhito Nagai1, Sachiko Omotani1, Masahito Shibano1, Akihide Kobayashi1, Akihiko Ito2, Ikumi Nishimura2, Yasutoshi Hatsuda1, Junji Mukai1, Hitomi Teramachi3, Michiaki Myotoku1.
Abstract
The use of semi-solid enteral nutrients plays an extremely important role in accurate nutrition management. In the present study, we compared the pharmacokinetic profile of orally administered carbamazepine (CBZ) in rats treated with liquid RACOL®, semi-solid RACOL®, and HINE E-gel®, which are enteral nutrients marketed in Japan. Since liquid and semi-solid formulations are both marketed in Japan for RACOL®, liquid RACOL® was orally administered to control rats. The serum concentration of CBZ at each sampling point was lower in the semi-solid RACOL®-treated group than in the liquid RACOL®-treated group. No significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic behavior of CBZ between the semi-solid RACOL®-treated and HINE E-gel®-treated groups. Regarding pharmacokinetic parameters, the impact of the area under the curve (AUC0→5h) was the liquid RACOL® group > the semi-solid RACOL® group ≈ the HINE E-gel® group. Therefore, we concluded that serum concentrations of CBZ were lower when concurrently treating with semi-solid enteral nutrients than when simultaneously processing liquid enteral nutrients. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: Nutrition management; carbamazepine; pharmacokinetics; semi-solid enteral nutrient
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31588194 PMCID: PMC6775268 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.35471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Figure 1Serum concentration-time courses of CBZ after its oral administration to rats. Serum concentrations of CBZ were measured after its oral administration (75 mg/kg). Results are shown as the means ± SD of four rats per group. Open circle: the liquid RACOL® group; Closed circle: the semi-solid RACOL® group; Closed triangle: the HINE E-gel® group.
Figure 2AUC0→5h values of CBZ after its oral administration. The values of AUC0→5h were calculated by the linear trapezoidal method. Results are shown as the means ± SD of four samples per group. *: Significantly different from the mean value of the liquid RACOL® group.