Literature DB >> 31588162

Penalized Empirical Likelihood for the Sparse Cox Regression Model.

Dongliang Wang1, Tong Tong Wu2, Yichuan Zhao3.   

Abstract

The current penalized regression methods for selecting predictor variables and estimating the associated regression coefficients in the sparse Cox model are mainly based on partial likelihood. In this paper, a bias-corrected empirical likelihood method is proposed for the sparse Cox model in conjunction with appropriate penalty functions when the dimensionality of data is high. Theoretical properties of the resulting estimator for the large sample are proved. Simulation studies suggest that penalized empirical likelihood works better than partial likelihood in terms of selecting correct predictors without introducing more model errors. The well-known primary biliary cirrhosis data set is used to illustrate the proposed penalized empirical likelihood method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coordinate descent algorithm; Wilks’ theorem; bias-corrected empirical likelihood; high-dimensional data; oracle property; penalized likelihood; right censoring; sparse proportional hazards model

Year:  2018        PMID: 31588162      PMCID: PMC6777733          DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2018.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference        ISSN: 0378-3758            Impact factor:   1.111


  13 in total

1.  Low-dimensional confounder adjustment and high-dimensional penalized estimation for survival analysis.

Authors:  Xiaochao Xia; Binyan Jiang; Jialiang Li; Wenyang Zhang
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Tuning parameter selectors for the smoothly clipped absolute deviation method.

Authors:  Hansheng Wang; Runze Li; Chih-Ling Tsai
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  A bootstrap resampling procedure for model building: application to the Cox regression model.

Authors:  W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Survival impact index and ultrahigh-dimensional model-free screening with survival outcomes.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Qi Zheng; Limin Peng; Zhipeng Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model.

Authors:  Jelle J Goeman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Covariance analysis of censored survival data.

Authors:  N Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  COORDINATE DESCENT ALGORITHMS FOR NONCONVEX PENALIZED REGRESSION, WITH APPLICATIONS TO BIOLOGICAL FEATURE SELECTION.

Authors:  Patrick Breheny; Jian Huang
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Empirical Likelihood for Censored Linear Regression and Variable Selection.

Authors:  Tong Tong Wu; Gang Li; Chengyong Tang
Journal:  Scand Stat Theory Appl       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 1.396

9.  EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD INFERENCE FOR THE COX MODEL WITH TIME-DEPENDENT COEFFICIENTS VIA LOCAL PARTIAL LIKELIHOOD.

Authors:  Yanqing Sun; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Yichuan Zhao
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.028

Review 10.  D-penicillamine for primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Y Gong; S L Frederiksen; C Gluud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Prognostic Score Model Based on Ten Differentially Methylated Genes for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Colon.

Authors:  Gongping Sun; He Duan; Yuanhao Xing; Dewei Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.989

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.