Literature DB >> 31587952

Safety and Efficacy of Sacroplasty for Sacral Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Vishnu Chandra1, Ethan Wajswol1, Pratik Shukla1, Sohail Contractor1, Abhishek Kumar2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sacroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic and malignant sacral fractures by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases were searched from their inception until February 2018 for articles describing sacroplasty. Inclusion criteria were as follows: studies reporting > 5 patients, and pain assessment before and after the procedure recorded with visual analog scale (VAS). Demographic data, procedural details, technical success rates, VAS scores before and after the procedure, and procedural complications were recorded. A random-effects meta-analyses of the VAS pain score before the procedure, at 24-48 hours, at 6 months, and at 12 months were calculated.
RESULTS: Nineteen studies (18 case series and 1 cohort study) were identified consisting of 861 total patients (682 women and 167 men; mean age 73.89 ± 9.73 years). Patients underwent sacroplasty for the following indications: sacral insufficiency fractures secondary to osteoporosis (n = 664), malignancy (n = 167), and nonspecified sacral insufficiency fractures (n = 30). Technical and clinical successes were achieved in 98.9% (852/861) and 95.7% (623/651) of patients undergoing sacroplasty, respectively. The pooled major complication rate was 0.3%, with 3 patients requiring surgical decompression for cement leakage. Random-effects meta-analyses demonstrated statistically significant differences in the VAS pain level at preprocedure, 24-48 hours, 6 months, and 12 months, with cumulative pain scores of 8.32 ± 0.01, 3.55 ± 0.01, 1.48 ± 0.01, and 0.923 ± 0.01, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacroplasty appears safe and effective for pain relief in patients with osteoporotic or malignant sacral fractures, with statistically significant sustained improvement in VAS pain scores up to 12 months.
Copyright © 2019 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31587952     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  4 in total

1.  [Clinical outcome and revenue situation after conservative, interventional and surgical/osteosynthetic treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures].

Authors:  Julian Ramin Andresen; Axel Prokop; Mathias Wollny; Sebastian Radmer; Hans-Christof Schober; Reimer Andresen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Percutaneous Sacroplasty with or without Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Painful Sacral Metastases.

Authors:  Q-H Tian; K -Han; T Wang; D-L Min; C-G Wu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.966

Review 3.  Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis and Sacrum: Current Trends in Literature.

Authors:  Erick Heiman; Pasquale Gencarelli; Alex Tang; John M Yingling; Frank A Liporace; Richard S Yoon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2022-06-07

4.  ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): Perceptions in the Assessment and Treatment of Pubic Rami and Sacral Fragility Fractures Amongst Healthcare Professionals in Geriatric Medicine and Surgery-A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Opinder Sahota; Paul Leighton; Maribel Cameron; Rachael Taylor; Terence Ong; Avril Drummond; Paul Hendrick; Nasir Quraishi; Khalid Salem
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.