| Literature DB >> 31587511 |
Robert Mason1, Helen C Dearden2, Bella Nguyen3, Jennifer A Soon4, Jessica Louise Smith5, Manreet Randhawa6, Andrew Mant7, Lydai Warburton3, Serigne Lo2,8, Tarek Meniawy3,9,10, Alexander Guminski2,11, Phillip Parente7,12, Sayed Ali6,10, Andrew Haydon4, Georgina V Long2,11, Matteo S Carlino2,5, Michael Millward3,10, Victoria G Atkinson1,13,14, Alexander M Menzies2,11.
Abstract
The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is a highly active systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma but can cause significant toxicity. We explore the safety and efficacy of this treatment in routine clinical practice, particularly in the setting of serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf (BRAF)-targeted therapy. Consecutive patients with unresectable stage IIIC/IV melanoma commenced on ipilimumab and nivolumab across 10 tertiary melanoma institutions in Australia were identified retrospectively. Data collected included demographics, response and survival outcomes. A total of 152 patients were included for analysis, 39% were treatment-naïve and 22% failed first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67% of patients, grade 3-5 in 38%. The overall objective response rate was 41%, 57% in treatment-naïve and 21% in BRAF/MEK failure patients. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-6.0) in the whole cohort, 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.0-NR) in treatment-naïve and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.6) in BRAF/MEK failure patients. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab can be used safely and effectively in a real-world population. While first-line efficacy appears comparable to trial populations, BRAF-mutant patients failing prior BRAF/MEK inhibitors show less response.Entities:
Keywords: BRAF; immunotherapy; ipilimumab; melanoma; nivolumab; targeted therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31587511 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res ISSN: 1755-1471 Impact factor: 4.693