Literature DB >> 31587261

Wild bonobo and chimpanzee females exhibit broadly similar patterns of behavioral maturation but some evidence for divergence.

Sean M Lee1, Carson M Murray1, Elizabeth V Lonsdorf2, Barbara Fruth3,4, Margaret A Stanton2, Jennifer Nichols1, Gottfried Hohmann5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Primates exhibit variation in rates of growth and development. Variation in female growth and development across ape species appears to be explained by the Ecological Risk Aversion Hypothesis (ERAH). Indeed, existing data on variation in somatic growth and reproductive maturation between humans' closest living ape relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees, appear to be consistent with this hypothesis. However, existing data on behavioral maturation between the two species appear to contradict this hypothesis. We present novel behavioral data on infant and juvenile females from wild populations of both species in order to further evaluate predictions of the ERAH as it relates to the speed of behavioral maturation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 3 years of behavioral data on 17 female bonobos (<8 years of age) from LuiKotale, Democratic Republic of the Congo and 40 years of behavioral data on 30 age-matched female chimpanzees from Gombe, Tanzania. We compared the timing of (a) the attainment of independence from mothers and (b) the development of social skills using the following proxies: proximity between females and their mothers and the time that females spent engaged in eating, suckling, social play, social grooming, and riding on their mothers.
RESULTS: We did not find species differences in the proportion of time that females spent in contact with their mothers or engaged in eating, suckling, social play, or social grooming. Female bonobos spent more time riding on their mothers than did female chimpanzees. Female bonobos spent more time at distances greater than 5 m from their mothers during the ages of 3-8 years, but females did not differ during the ages of 0-3 years. DISCUSSION: Behavioral maturation is largely similar between females of the two species based on the ages and proxies considered herein. We propose alternative explanations for the differences that we found in proximity and riding that do not invoke differences in underlying rates of maturation.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Pan; development; ecological risk aversion; infanticide; self-domestication

Year:  2019        PMID: 31587261     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  5 in total

1.  Transition to siblinghood causes a substantial and long-lasting increase in urinary cortisol levels in wild bonobos.

Authors:  Verena Behringer; Andreas Berghänel; Tobias Deschner; Sean M Lee; Barbara Fruth; Gottfried Hohmann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Age and sex differences in juvenile bonobos in party associations with their mothers at Wamba.

Authors:  Kazuya Toda; Heungjin Ryu; Takeshi Furuichi
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Gregariousness, foraging effort, and affiliative interactions in lactating bonobos and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Sean M Lee; Gottfried Hohmann; Elizabeth V Lonsdorf; Barbara Fruth; Carson M Murray
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Do immigrant female bonobos prefer older resident females as important partners when integrating into a new group?

Authors:  Kazuya Toda; Takeshi Furuichi
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.781

5.  Two wild female bonobos adopted infants from a different social group at Wamba.

Authors:  Nahoko Tokuyama; Kazuya Toda; Marie-Laure Poiret; Bahanande Iyokango; Batuafe Bakaa; Shintaro Ishizuka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.