Literature DB >> 31586890

Noninvasive Detection of Colorectal Carcinomas Using Serum Protein Biomarkers.

Melanie M Ivancic1, Bryant W Megna2, Yuriy Sverchkov3, Mark Craven3, Mark Reichelderfer4, Perry J Pickhardt5, Michael R Sussman6, Gregory D Kennedy7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A major roadblock to reducing the mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) is prompt detection and treatment, and a simple blood test is likely to have higher compliance than all of the current methods. The purpose of this report is to examine the utility of a mass spectrometry-based blood serum protein biomarker test for detection of CRC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood was drawn from individuals (n = 213) before colonoscopy or from patients with nonmetastatic CRC (n = 50) before surgery. Proteins were isolated from the serum of patients using targeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We designed a machine-learning statistical model to assess these proteins.
RESULTS: When considered individually, over 70% of the selected biomarkers showed significance by Mann-Whitney testing for distinguishing cancer-bearing cases from cancer-free cases. Using machine-learning methods, peptides derived from epidermal growth factor receptor and leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 were consistently identified as highly predictive for detecting CRC from cancer-free cases. A five-marker panel consisting of leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1, epidermal growth factor receptor, inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy-chain family member 4, hemopexin, and superoxide dismutase 3 performed the best with 70% specificity at over 89% sensitivity (area under the curve = 0.86) in the validation set. For distinguishing regional from localized cancers, cross-validation within the training set showed that a panel of four proteins consisting of CD44 molecule, GC-vitamin D-binding protein, C-reactive protein, and inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy-chain family member 3 yielded the highest performance (area under the curve = 0.75).
CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive blood biomarker panels identified here could serve as screening/detection alternatives for CRC in a human population and potentially useful for staging of existing cancer.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Colorectal neoplasms; Proteomic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31586890      PMCID: PMC6957232          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  38 in total

1.  The best screening test for colorectal cancer is the one that gets done well.

Authors:  James E Allison
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Emerging molecular biomarkers--blood-based strategies to detect and monitor cancer.

Authors:  Samir M Hanash; Christina S Baik; Olli Kallioniemi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Ann G Zauber; Carolyn M Rutter; Steffie K Naber; V Paul Doria-Rose; Chester Pabiniak; Colden Johanson; Sara E Fischer; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Sandeep Vijan; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Jennifer P Thomas; Yunghui V Lin; Roxana Muñoz; Chim Lau; Ma Somsouk; Najwa El-Nachef; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-09

Review 5.  Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Kijima; Takahiro Sasaki; Koichi Nagata; Kenichi Utano; Alan T Lefor; Hideharu Sugimoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Emerging stool-based and blood-based non-invasive DNA tests for colorectal cancer screening: the importance of cancer prevention in addition to cancer detection.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-08

7.  The concentrations of EGFR, LRG1, ITIH4, and F5 in serum correlate with the number of colonic adenomas in ApcPirc/+ rats.

Authors:  Melanie M Ivancic; Amy A Irving; Kelli G Jonakin; William F Dove; Michael R Sussman
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-09-08

8.  Significance of preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein as an indicator for prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T Nozoe; T Matsumata; M Kitamura; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Expression of the Cancer Stem Cell Markers CD44 and CD133 in Colorectal Cancer: An Immunohistochemical Staining Analysis.

Authors:  Injae Hong; Seong Woo Hong; Yeo Goo Chang; Woo Yong Lee; Byungmo Lee; Yun Kyung Kang; You Sun Kim; In Wook Paik; Hyucksang Lee
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 10.  Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Justin L Sovich; Zachary Sartor; Subhasis Misra
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Colorectal Cancer in Terms of Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Development, Symptoms and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Tomasz Sawicki; Monika Ruszkowska; Anna Danielewicz; Ewa Niedźwiedzka; Tomasz Arłukowicz; Katarzyna E Przybyłowicz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Quantifying the Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) Spatially in Tissues by Probe via MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Daojiang Yu; Peng Lai; Tao Yan; Kai Fang; Lei Chen; Shuyu Zhang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  Coupling of serum CK20 and hyper-methylated CLIP4 as promising biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis: from bioinformatics screening to clinical validation.

Authors:  Zhongjian Liu; Hui Tang; Wen Zhang; Jinli Wang; Lilan Wan; Xisha Li; Yuping Ji; Na Kong; Yanfang Zhang; Jiangang Wang; Zhang Fan; Qiang Guo
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 4.  Liquid Biopsy and Artificial Intelligence as Tools to Detect Signatures of Colorectal Malignancies: A Modern Approach in Patient's Stratification.

Authors:  Octav Ginghina; Ariana Hudita; Marius Zamfir; Andrada Spanu; Mara Mardare; Irina Bondoc; Laura Buburuzan; Sergiu Emil Georgescu; Marieta Costache; Carolina Negrei; Cornelia Nitipir; Bianca Galateanu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Advancements in Oncology with Artificial Intelligence-A Review Article.

Authors:  Nikitha Vobugari; Vikranth Raja; Udhav Sethi; Kejal Gandhi; Kishore Raja; Salim R Surani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Construction of 2DE Patterns of Plasma Proteins: Aspect of Potential Tumor Markers.

Authors:  Stanislav Naryzhny; Natalia Ronzhina; Elena Zorina; Fedor Kabachenko; Nikolay Klopov; Victor Zgoda
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 7.  Systems-level biomarkers identification and drug repositioning in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hande Beklen; Esra Yildirim; Medi Kori; Beste Turanli; Kazim Yalcin Arga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-07-15

Review 8.  LRG1: an emerging player in disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Carlotta Camilli; Alexandra E Hoeh; Giulia De Rossi; Stephen E Moss; John Greenwood
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 12.771

Review 9.  Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hang Qiu; Shuhan Ding; Jianbo Liu; Liya Wang; Xiaodong Wang
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 10.  Advances in High Throughput Proteomics Profiling in Establishing Potential Biomarkers for Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Authors:  Md Zahirul Islam Khan; Shing Yau Tam; Helen Ka Wai Law
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.