Literature DB >> 3158636

Assessment of transdiaphragmatic pressure in humans.

D Laporta, A Grassino.   

Abstract

Maximal force developed by the diaphragm at functional residual capacity is a useful index to establish muscle weakness; however, great disparity in its reproducibility can be observed among reports in the literature. We evaluated five maneuvers to measure maximal transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdimax) in order to establish best reproducibility and value. Thirty-five naïve subjects, including 10 normal subjects (group 1), 12 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group 2), and 13 patients with restrictive pulmonary disease (group 3), were studied. Each subject performed five separate maneuvers in random order that were repeated until reproducible values were obtained. The maneuvers were Mueller with (A) and without mouthpiece (B), abdominal expulsive effort with open glottis (C), two-step (maneuver C combined with Mueller effort) (D), and feedback [two-step with visual feedback of pleural (Ppl) and abdominal (Pab) pressure] (E). The greatest reproducible Pdimax values were obtained with maneuver E (P less than 0.01) (group 1: 180 +/- 14 cmH2O). The second best maneuvers were A, B, and D (group 1: 154 +/- 25 cmH2O). Maneuver C produced the lowest values. For all maneuvers, group 1 produced higher values than groups 2 and 3 (P less than 0.001), which were similar. The Ppl to Pdi ratio was 0.6 in maneuvers A and B, 0.4 in D and E, and 0.2 in C. We conclude that visual feedback of Ppl and Pab helped the subjects to elicit maximal diaphragmatic effort in a reproducible fashion. It is likely that the great variability of values in Pdimax previously reported are the result of inadequate techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3158636     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1985.58.5.1469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  32 in total

1.  Maximal dynamic expiratory pressures with fast and slow inspirations.

Authors:  Ashraf Altarifi; M Safwan Badr; George E Tzelepis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Activation of human respiratory muscles during different voluntary manoeuvres.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D K McKenzie; B L Plassman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Absence of a hemidiaphragm: mechanical implications.

Authors:  F D McCool; G E Tzelepis; J Mead
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 4.  Diaphragmatic paresis: pathophysiology, clinical features, and investigation.

Authors:  G J Gibson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Assessing inspiratory muscle strength by sniff nasal inspiratory pressure.

Authors:  Hélène Prigent; Michèle Lejaille; Line Falaize; Alain Louis; Maria Ruquet; Brigitte Fauroux; Jean Claude Raphael; Frédéric Lofaso
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 6.  Assessing breathing effort in mechanical ventilation: physiology and clinical implications.

Authors:  Heder de Vries; Annemijn Jonkman; Zhong-Hua Shi; Angélique Spoelstra-de Man; Leo Heunks
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

7.  Diaphragm muscle function following midcervical contusion injury in rats.

Authors:  Obaid U Khurram; Matthew J Fogarty; Sabhya Rana; Pangdra Vang; Gary C Sieck; Carlos B Mantilla
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 8.  Clinical management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with muscle dysfunction.

Authors:  Joaquim Gea; Carme Casadevall; Sergi Pascual; Mauricio Orozco-Levi; Esther Barreiro
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Conditioning of the diaphragm by phrenic nerve pacing in primary alveolar hypoventilation.

Authors:  P G Wilcox; P D Paré; J A Fleetham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Exercise-induced diaphragmatic fatigue in healthy humans.

Authors:  B D Johnson; M A Babcock; O E Suman; J A Dempsey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.