| Literature DB >> 31584248 |
Haibing Yang1, Matheus R Benatti1, Rucha A Karve2, Arizona Fox1, Richard Meilan2,3, Nicholas C Carpita1,3,4, Maureen C McCann1,3.
Abstract
The molecular basis of cell-cell adhesion in woody tissues is not known. Xylem cells in wood particles of hybrid poplar (<span class="Species">Populus tremula × <span class="Species">P. alba cv. INRA 717-<span class="Chemical">1B4) were separated by oxidation of lignin with acidic sodium chlorite when combined with extraction of xylan and rhamnogalacturonan-I (RG-I) using either dilute alkali or a combination of xylanase and RG-lyase. Acidic chlorite followed by dilute alkali treatment enables cell-cell separation by removing material from the compound middle lamellae between the primary walls. Although lignin is known to contribute to adhesion between wood cells, we found that removing lignin is a necessary but not sufficient condition to effect complete cell-cell separation in poplar lines with various ratios of syringyl:guaiacyl lignin. Transgenic poplar lines expressing an Arabidopsis thaliana gene encoding an RG-lyase (AtRGIL6) showed enhanced cell-cell separation, increased accessibility of cellulose and xylan to hydrolytic enzyme activities, and increased fragmentation of intact wood particles into small cell clusters and single cells under mechanical stress. Our results indicate a novel function for RG-I, and also for xylan, as determinants of cell-cell adhesion in poplar wood cell walls. Genetic control of RG-I content provides a new strategy to increase catalyst accessibility and saccharification yields from woody biomass for biofuels and industrial chemicals.Entities:
Keywords: cell wall; cell-cell adhesion; lignin; middle lamella; poplar; rhamnogalacturonan lyase; rhamnogalacturonan-I; xylan
Year: 2019 PMID: 31584248 PMCID: PMC7061878 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol J ISSN: 1467-7644 Impact factor: 9.803
Figure 1Cell–cell separation of poplar wood particles after sequential extraction with acidic chlorite and dilute alkali. (a) Bright‐field micrographs of toluidine blue‐stained wild‐type (WT) 717‐1B4 particles with acidic chlorite alone for 24 h (AC only); 0.1 m NaOH, dilute alkali, treatment alone for 24 h (NaOH only); 24 h acidic chlorite followed by 24 h dilute alkali (AC→NaOH); and 24 h dilute alkali followed by 24 h acidic chlorite (NaOH→AC). Bar, 100 µm. (b) Micrographs of settled‐cell volumes of wood particles in 15‐mL Falcon tubes after treatments as indicated. (c) Percentages of cells released from WT and lignin genetic variants as single cells or cell clusters. Top: treatment of WT, high‐S lignin (S) and high‐G‐lignin G, variants with acidic chlorite alone for 24 h (AC only). Middle: treatment with acidic chlorite for 3 h, followed by 0.1 m NaOH for 24 h (3h AC→NaOH). Bottom: treatment with acidic chlorite for 24 h, followed by 0.1 m NaOH. Percentages of single cells (blue) or cell clusters of 2‐4 cells (red), 5‐10 cells (green), and> 10 cells (purple) were determined from >1000 cells counted per genotype/treatment. Values are the means ± SD (n = 3 technical replicates); asterisks indicate significant differences based on Tukey‐Kramer Post Hoc test after one‐way ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05 relative to WT.
Figure 2Electron micrographs of untreated and treated WT poplar particles. (a) Electron micrographs of untreated WT particles. Bar, 20 µm. (b) Magnification of inset box in (a). Bar, 10 µm. (c) Magnification of inset box in (b). Large arrowheads indicate middle lamella. Bar, 2 µm. (d) WT particles after treatment with acidic chlorite (AC) for 24 h. Bar, 20 µm. (e) Magnification of inset box in (d). Bar, 10 µm. (f) Magnification of inset box in (e). Large arrowheads indicate middle lamella. Small arrowheads indicate a zone of reduced electron density between the primary and secondary wall. Bar, 2 µm. (g) WT particles after treatment with 0.1 m NaOH for 24 h. Bar, 20 µm. (h) Magnification of inset box in G. Bar, 10 µm. (i) Magnification of inset box in (h). Large arrowheads indicate middle lamella. Small arrowheads indicate a zone of reduced electron density between the primary and secondary wall. Bar, 2 µm. (j) WT particles after treatment with 3 h acidic chlorite followed by 24 h dilute alkali. Bar, 20 µm. (k) Magnification of inset box in (j). Bar, 10 µm. (l) Magnification of inset box in (k). Large arrowheads indicate middle lamella. Small arrowheads indicate a zone of reduced electron density between the primary and secondary wall. Bar, 2 µm. (m) WT particles after treatment with 24 h acidic chlorite followed by 24 h dilute alkali. Bar, 20 µm. (n) Magnification of inset box in (m). Bar, 10 µm. (o) Magnification of inset box in (n). Large arrowheads indicate middle lamella. Small arrowheads indicate a zone of reduced electron density between the primary and secondary wall. Bar, 2 µm.
Figure 3Monosaccharide and polysaccharide contents of materials extracted from wood particles of WT and lignin variants by acidic chlorite and dilute alkali. Monosaccharide distribution in materials extracted (a) by acidic chlorite alone for 3 h (AC only), (b) by 0.1 m NaOH for 24 h, following treatment with acidic chlorite for 3 h (AC→NaOH), (c) by 0.1 m NaOH alone for 24 h (NaOH only), and (d) by acidic chlorite for 3 h, following treatment with 0.1 m NaOH for 24 h (NaOH→AC). Relative proportions of major polysaccharides in extracts from (e) acidic chlorite (AC) treatment and (f) 0.1 m NaOH treatment after acidic chlorite treatment. Some polysaccharide names abbreviated as: xylogalacturonan, (Xy)HG; arabinogalactan protein, AGP; rhamnogalacturonan‐I, RG‐I; and xyloglucan, XyG. Values are derived from linkage analyses of cell walls isolated from wild type (blue), high‐S (red), and high‐G (green) lines.
Figure 4Cell–cell separation of Catalytically De‐Lignified (CDL) WT Poplar wood particles after dilute alkali or enzyme treatments. (a) Bright‐field micrographs of Toluidine Blue‐stained WT particles following treatment with Ni/C catalyst to remove lignin and then incubation in buffer (CDL→buffer); CDL followed by dilute alkali treatment for 24 h (CDL→NaOH); CDL followed by treatment with endo‐(1→4)‐α‐rhamnogalacturonan‐I lyase (CDL→RGL); CDL followed by treatment with endo‐(1→4)‐β‐D‐xylanase (CDL→xylanase): CDL followed by treatment with endo‐(1→4)‐α‐rhamnogalacturonan‐I lyase and then endo‐(1→4)‐β‐D‐xylanase (CDL→RGL→xylanase). Bar, 100 µm. (b) Percentages of single cells (blue) or cell clusters of 2‐4 cells (red), 5–10 cells (green) and> 10 cells (purple) were determined from >1000 cells counted per treatment. Values are the means ± SD (n = 3 technical replicates); asterisks indicate significant differences based on Tukey‐Kramer Post Hoc test after one‐way ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5Cell–cell separation of WT and AtRGIL6‐expressing poplar wood particles after sequential extraction using acidic chlorite and dilute alkali. (a) Relative expression levels of the transgene in six independent AtRGIL6‐expressing poplar lines as determined by qRT‐PCR, normalized to line #1. Values are the means ± SD, n = 3 biological replicates. (b) Time‐course of relative RG‐lyase activity of cell‐wall proteins extracted from wild type (WT) and three AtRGIL6‐expressing lines. Values are the means ± SD, n = 3 biological replicates. (c) Top: bright‐field micrographs of Toluidine Blue‐stained WT and particles from six independent transgenic lines following treatment with acidic chlorite for 3 h followed by 0.1 m NaOH for 24 h. Bar, 200 µm. Middle: Photographs of settled‐cell volumes of wood particles in 15‐mL Corning tubes. Bottom: Percentages of single cells (blue) or cell clusters of 2‐4 cells (red), 5‐10 cells (green), and >10 cells (purple) were determined from> 1000 cells counted per genotype/treatment. Values are the means ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates); asterisks indicate significant differences based on Student t‐test P ≤ 0.05 relative to WT.
Figure 6Mole percentages of cell‐wall RG‐I and side chains in materials extracted from poplar wood particles of WT and three independent AtRGIL6‐expressing lines. Relative proportions of RG‐I and arabinan and galactan side chains extracted by (a) ammonium oxalate (AO), (b) dilute alkali, after ammonium oxalate treatment (AO→NaOH), and (c) ammonium oxalate‐ and NaOH‐extracted material (Total). Values are derived from cell walls isolated from wild type (blue) and AtRGIL‐expressing lines #15 (red), #7 (green) and #34 (purple), and represent means ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates).
Figure 7Expression of AtRGIL6 in WT poplar facilitates enzymatic digestion. Wood particles from wild type (WT) and three AtRGIL6‐expressing lines (#1, #7, and #34) were treated with acidic chlorite for 3 h followed by 0.1 m NaOH for 24 h to generate samples with partial cell separation (WT‐PS, #1‐PS, #7‐PS, #34‐PS) before incubation with a CellicTM Ctec2 enzyme cocktail. Dotted lines represent sugar yields with a CellicTM Ctec2 enzyme cocktail in untreated controls. Yields are shown as a percentage of initial dry weight (DW). Values are the means ± SD, n = 3 biological replicates. Time‐course of yields in 72 h of (a) xylose, (b) glucose, and (c) total sugar.