Literature DB >> 31584209

Clonal evaluation of early onset prostate cancer by expression profiling of ERG, SPINK1, ETV1, and ETV4 on whole-mount radical prostatectomy tissue.

Zhichun Lu1, Sean R Williamson1, Shannon Carskadon2, Pavithra D Arachchige2, Gaury Dhamdhere2, Daniel S Schultz1, Hans Stricker2, James O Peabody2, Wooju Jeong2, Dhananjay A Chitale1, Tarek A Bismar3, Craig G Rogers2, Mani Menon2, Nilesh S Gupta1, Nallasivam Palanisamy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Expression profiles of erythroblast transformation-specific (ETS)-related gene fusions and serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 1 (SPINK1) in early onset prostate cancer have not been thoroughly explored.
METHODS: We retrieved 151 radical prostatectomy specimens from young men with prostate cancer (<55 years) and characterized the expression of ETS-related gene (ERG), SPINK1, ETS Variant 1 (ETV1), and ETV4 by dual immunohistochemistry and dual RNA in situ hybridization. Age, race, family history, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, biochemical recurrence, and pathological variables using whole-mount radical prostatectomy tissue were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 313 tumor nodules from 151 men including 68 (45%) Caucasians and 61 (40%) African Americans were included in the analysis. Positive family history of prostate cancer was seen in 65 (43%) patients. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen ranged from 0.3 to 52.7 ng/mL (mean = 7.04). The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 123.7 months (mean = 30.3). Biochemical recurrence was encountered in 8 of 151 (5%). ERG overexpression was observed in 85 of 151 (56%) cases, followed by SPINK1 in 61 of 151 (40%), ETV1 in 9 of 149 (6%), and ETV4 in 4 of 141 (3%). There were 25 of 151 (17%) cases showing both ERG and SPINK1 overexpression within different regions of either the same tumor focus or different foci. Higher frequency of ERG overexpression was seen in younger patients (≤45 years old; 76% vs 49%, P = .002), Caucasian men (71% vs 41% P = .0007), organ-confined tumors (64% vs 33%, P = .0008), and tumors of Gleason Grade groups 1 and 2 (62% vs 26%, P = .009). SPINK1 overexpression was more in African American men (68% vs 26%, P = .00008), in tumors with high tumor volume (>20%) and with anterior located tumors. ETV1 and ETV4 demonstrated rare overexpression in these tumors, particularly in the higher-grade tumors.
CONCLUSION: This study expands the knowledge of the clonal evolution of multifocal cancer in young patients and support differences in relation to racial background and genetics of prostate cancer.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunohistochemistry; Prostate cancer; RNA in situ hybridization; Tumor heterogeneity; Whole-mount radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31584209     DOI: 10.1002/pros.23914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  4 in total

Review 1.  Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael C Haffner; Wilbert Zwart; Martine P Roudier; Lawrence D True; William G Nelson; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Peter S Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Simultaneous Engagement of Tumor and Stroma Targeting Antibodies by Engineered NK-92 Cells Expressing CD64 Controls Prostate Cancer Growth.

Authors:  Hallie M Hintz; Kristin M Snyder; Jianming Wu; Robert Hullsiek; James D Dahlvang; Geoffrey T Hart; Bruce Walcheck; Aaron M LeBeau
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 12.020

Review 3.  Androgen-Driven Fusion Genes and Chimeric Transcripts in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Mauro Scaravilli; Sonja Koivukoski; Leena Latonen
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-02-09

4.  ARPC1B Is Associated with Lethal Prostate Cancer and Its Inhibition Decreases Cell Invasion and Migration In Vitro.

Authors:  Yaser Gamallat; Hend Zaaluk; Ealia Khosh Kish; Ramy Abdelsalam; Konstantinos Liosis; Sunita Ghosh; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.