Michal Granot1,2, Pnina Dagul1, Doron Aronson3,4. 1. The Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, The Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. 2. Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Studies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. 3. Department of Cardiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. 4. The Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Animal models and human studies show that resting blood pressure (BP) is inversely associated with pain sensitivity. The phenomenon of "hypertension-associated hypoalgesia" was proposed as a possible explanation for the intervariability in pain perception. Given that a portion of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) do not experience significant pain, we used the model of severe cardiac ischemia to explore whether BP affects the intensity of chest pain. METHODS: Patients with AMI admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit with coronary catheterization-proven completely occluded coronary artery were included (n = 67). Resting BP at admission and 5 days after AMI was obtained. Participants reported chest pain intensity and underwent psychophysical evaluation including pain ratings for pressure, heat, and pinprick stimuli as well as temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation paradigms. RESULTS: Patients with lower systolic BP (≤120 mm Hg) vs higher (≥140 mm Hg) reported higher chest pain scores at symptom onset (82.3 vs 61.7, P = 0.048) and during peak AMI (82.8 vs 57.5, P = 0.019). Higher pain ratings in response to pinprick stimulus were associated with lower BP at admission (analysis of variance P = 0.036). Patients with hypertension demonstrated lower pain sensitivity in response to pressure stimulation (531.7 ± 158.9 kPa/s vs 429.1 ± 197.4). No significant associations were observed between BP and the other assessed psychophysical measures. CONCLUSION: Study findings reinforce the phenomenon of hypertension-associated hypoalgesia through characterization of the association between BP and clinical pain experiences at onset and during AMI in a model of acute clinical pain.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Animal models and human studies show that resting blood pressure (BP) is inversely associated with pain sensitivity. The phenomenon of "hypertension-associated hypoalgesia" was proposed as a possible explanation for the intervariability in pain perception. Given that a portion of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) do not experience significant pain, we used the model of severe cardiac ischemia to explore whether BP affects the intensity of chest pain. METHODS: Patients with AMI admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit with coronary catheterization-proven completely occluded coronary artery were included (n = 67). Resting BP at admission and 5 days after AMI was obtained. Participants reported chest pain intensity and underwent psychophysical evaluation including pain ratings for pressure, heat, and pinprick stimuli as well as temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation paradigms. RESULTS: Patients with lower systolic BP (≤120 mm Hg) vs higher (≥140 mm Hg) reported higher chest pain scores at symptom onset (82.3 vs 61.7, P = 0.048) and during peak AMI (82.8 vs 57.5, P = 0.019). Higher pain ratings in response to pinprick stimulus were associated with lower BP at admission (analysis of variance P = 0.036). Patients with hypertension demonstrated lower pain sensitivity in response to pressure stimulation (531.7 ± 158.9 kPa/s vs 429.1 ± 197.4). No significant associations were observed between BP and the other assessed psychophysical measures. CONCLUSION: Study findings reinforce the phenomenon of hypertension-associated hypoalgesia through characterization of the association between BP and clinical pain experiences at onset and during AMI in a model of acute clinical pain.
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White; Allan S Jaffe; Fred S Apple; Marcello Galvani; Hugo A Katus; L Kristin Newby; Jan Ravkilde; Bernard Chaitman; Peter M Clemmensen; Mikael Dellborg; Hanoch Hod; Pekka Porela; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; George A Beller; Robert Bonow; Ernst E Van der Wall; Jean-Pierre Bassand; William Wijns; T Bruce Ferguson; Philippe G Steg; Barry F Uretsky; David O Williams; Paul W Armstrong; Elliott M Antman; Keith A Fox; Christian W Hamm; E Magnus Ohman; Maarten L Simoons; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Enrique P Gurfinkel; José-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Prem Pais; Shanti Mendis; Jun-Ren Zhu; Lars C Wallentin; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Kim M Fox; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Silvia G Priori; Michal Tendera; Liisa-Maria Voipio-Pulkki; Alec Vahanian; A John Camm; Raffaele De Caterina; Veronica Dean; Kenneth Dickstein; Gerasimos Filippatos; Christian Funck-Brentano; Irene Hellemans; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Keith McGregor; Udo Sechtem; Sigmund Silber; Michal Tendera; Petr Widimsky; José Luis Zamorano; Joao Morais; Sorin Brener; Robert Harrington; David Morrow; Michael Lim; Marco A Martinez-Rios; Steve Steinhubl; Glen N Levine; W Brian Gibler; David Goff; Marco Tubaro; Darek Dudek; Nawwar Al-Attar Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Katarzyna Leźnicka; Maciej Pawlak; Agnieszka Maciejewska-Skrendo; Jacek Buczny; Anna Wojtkowska; Grzegorz Pawlus; Anna Machoy-Mokrzyńska; Aleksandra Jażdżewska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 4.614