Literature DB >> 31583313

Risk factors for bleeding in patients receiving fondaparinux after colorectal cancer surgery.

Jongsung Pak1, Masataka Ikeda1, Mamoru Uemura1, Masakazu Miyake1, Kazuhiro Nishikawa1, Atsushi Miyamoto1, Michihiko Miyazaki1, Motohiro Hirao1, Shoji Nakamori1, Mitsugu Sekimoto1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for bleeding complications in patients who receive Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with fondaparinux (FPX) after colorectal cancer surgery. <br> METHODS: Records of 546 patients who underwent VTE prophylaxis with intermittent pneumatic compression and FPX after colorectal cancer surgery between January 2009 and May 2014 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, surgical procedures, and patient laboratory data were examined to identify risk factors for bleeding complications using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. <br> RESULTS: We reviewed the records of 324 males and 222 females. Median age and BMI were 68.5 years and 22.7 kg/m2, respectively. The number of laparoscopic surgeries was 366. Median operative time and blood loss were 188.5 min and 20 ml, respectively. The incidence (%) of bleeding events was 5.3%. In univariate analysis, age ≥80 years, BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2, hypertension, and antithrombotic therapy were associated with a significantly higher incidence of bleeding events. Multivariate analysis identified age ≥80 years (odds ratio 5.814; 95% confidence interval 2.502-13.278) as an independent risk factor. <br> CONCLUSION: Age ≥80 is a risk factor for bleeding in patients who receive FPX for VTE prophylaxis after colorectal cancer surgery.
Copyright © 2017 by The Japan Society of Coloproctology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bleeding; colorectal cancer; fondaparinux; laparoscopic surgery; venous thromboembolism

Year:  2018        PMID: 31583313      PMCID: PMC6768684          DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2017-022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon        ISSN: 2432-3853


Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major complication after surgery. It occurs more frequently after colorectal surgery than after any other type of surgery[1]). The mortality rate is high (4.3-56.7%)[1-5]) and perioperative prophylaxis is essential. Japanese guidelines for VTE prophylaxis after general surgery recommend mechanical and/or pharmacological VTE prophylaxis[6]). Pharmacological VTE prophylaxis reduces the rate of VTE[7],[8]) but leads to bleeding events[9],[10]). However, few studies have identified bleeding risk during pharmacological prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for bleeding in patients receiving fondaparinux (FPX) after colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

A total of 571 consecutive patients, including patients with varicose veins, received FPX with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) during and after colorectal cancer surgery at Osaka National Hospital between January 1, 2009 and May 31, 2014. Patients with multiple synchronous malignancies, unfractionated heparin therapy, or urgent surgery were excluded. We retrospectively analyzed clinical factors and identified risk factors for bleeding in patients receiving FPX with IPC after colorectal cancer surgery. Adverse events were observed until hospital discharge.*** Our VTE prophylaxis protocol after colorectal cancer surgery is shown in Figure 1. Patients wore elastic stockings before surgery and underwent IPC immediately after induction of anesthesia until they began to walk again. FPX (2.5 mg once daily) was injected subcutaneously from the evening of postoperative day (POD) 1 to the evening of POD 4. Figure 2 shows the VTE prophylaxis protocol for patients who received epidural anesthesia. FPX was not injected on the evening of POD 2 because the epidural catheter was removed in the morning of POD 3. Patients with age ≥80 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 ml/min, or body weight <40 kg received either a reduced dose of FPX (1.5 mg once daily) with IPC or IPC alone.
Figure 1.

Our protocol of VTE prophylaxis for colorectal cancer surgery.

Figure 2.

Our protocol of VTE prophylaxis for colorectal cancer surgery in the patients who received epidural anesthesia.

Our protocol of VTE prophylaxis for colorectal cancer surgery. Our protocol of VTE prophylaxis for colorectal cancer surgery in the patients who received epidural anesthesia. Bleeding was classified as major if the event was at least one of the following: fatal, retroperitoneal, or intracranial; involved a critical organ (intraocular, adrenal, endocardial, or spinal bleeding); occurred at a surgical site that required surgical intervention; clinically overt with a decrease in hemoglobin of at least 2 g/dl; or needed transfusion of ≥800 ml red blood cells or whole blood. Minor bleeding was defined as bleeding that did not meet any of the major bleeding criteria. All continuous data are expressed as medians (range). Frequency distributions for categorical data were compared using the χ2 test. The association between bleeding event and bleeding risk factors was assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Results are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed with JMP 11.0 SAS software (SAS Institute Inc.). The study was done in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1975, as revised in 2008). The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital. All study participants provided written informed consent.

Results

Clinical characteristics of the study population

Of the 571 patients, 25 were excluded for concomitant treatment with another surgical procedure for cancer (n=17), postoperative administration of unfractionated heparin (n=5), and emergency surgery (n=3). Table 1 shows the patient characteristics of the 546 remaining patients. There were 324 male patients (59.3%) and 222 female patients (40.7%). Median age and body mass index (BMI) were 68.5 years and 22.7 kg/m2, respectively. In terms of tumor location, 155 (28.4%) tumors were in the right colon, 221 (40.8%) were in the left colon, and 170 (31.1%) were in the rectum.
Table 1.

Background Clinical Characteristics of the Patients (n=546).

Sex
male324 (59.3%)
female222 (40.7%)
Age (years), median [range]68.5 [27-92]
Weight (kg), median [range]58.0 [31.5-111.4]
BMI (kg/m2), median [range]22.7 [14.3-39.5]
Tumor location, n (%)
Right side colon155 (28.4%)
Left side colon221 (40.8%)
Rectum170 (31.1%)
Background Clinical Characteristics of the Patients (n=546). Table 2 shows the surgical characteristics of the 546 patients; 366 (67.0%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Median operative time and blood loss were 188.5 minutes and 20 ml, respectively.
Table 2.

Surgical Characteristics (n=546).

Approach n (%)
Laparotomy180 (33.0%)
Laparoscopy366 (67.0%)
Operation time in minutes, median [range]188.5 [74-1047]
Blood loss in ml, median [range]20 [0-2340]
Surgical Characteristics (n=546). Table 3 shows the incidence of postoperative complications. The incidence of bleeding during the treatment period was 5.3% (29/546), with one major and 28 minor bleeding events. One female patient had major bleeding. She underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. She had a melena on POD 5, which required endoscopic hemostasis for the bleeding of the anastomotic site. Melena was the most frequent event (3.1%, 17/546). None of the patients had bleeding at the epidural catheter insertion site or symptomatic VTE.
Table 3.

Incindence of Bleeding Events (n=546).

Major bleeding, n (%)1 (0.2%)
Minor bleeding, n (%)28 (5.1%)
Subcutaneous hemorrhage/hematoma3 (0.5%)
Bloody drain discharge hemorrhage at drain site1 (0.2%)
Melena17 (3.1%)
Bleeding of epidural catheter insertion site0 (0%)
Hematuria6 (1.1%)
vaginal hemorrhage1 (0.2%)
Symptomatic VTE, n (%)0 (0%)
Incindence of Bleeding Events (n=546).

Risk factors for bleeding events

To assess risk factors for bleeding, univariate analysis was performed for major and minor bleeding events with patient-related factors (age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities), patient laboratory data (preoperative liver function results and platelet count), and surgery-related factors (approach, operative time, operative blood loss, and lateral lymph node dissection). Table 4 shows that age ≥80 years, BMI ≥25 kg/m2, hypertension, and antithrombotic therapy were associated with a significantly higher incidence of bleeding events. We then performed multivariate analysis using factors with p values of <0.05. This revealed that age ≥80 years (OR 5.188, 95% CI 2.226-11.814) was an independent risk factor for bleeding.
Table 4.

Univariate/multivariate Analysis of Factors in Patient and Surgical Characteristics Associated with Bleeding Events.

Variable n Incidence of bleeding p value Odds ratio p 95%CI
Age
<804783.6%<0.001Referencee
≥806817.6%5.1880.0022.226-11.814
Sex (Male/Female)
Male3244.6%0.391
Female2226.3%
BMI (kg/m2)
<25.04134.1%0.038Referencee
≥25.01339.0%2.1340.0760.922-4.821
Hypertension
yes2078.2%0.0201.5510.3060.667-3.633
no3393.5%Referencee
Diabetes mellitus
yes1009.0%0.089
no4464.5%
Antithrombotic therapy
yes6211.3%0.0461.4340.4810.503-3.683
no4844.5%Referencee
Approach
Laparotomy1804.4%0.520
Laparoscopy3665.7%
Operation time (min)
<602484.4%0.250
≥602986.0%
Blood loss (ml)
<503905.1%0.765
≥501565.8%
Pre-op AST level (IU/L)
<202526.0%0.536
≥202944.8%
Pre-op ALT level (IU/L)
<152465.7%0.720
≥153005.0%
Pre-op Hemoglobin level (g/dL)
<13.03055.6%0.758
≥13.02415.0%
Pre-op Platelet count (×104/μl)
<152611.5%0.184
≥155205.0%
Univariate/multivariate Analysis of Factors in Patient and Surgical Characteristics Associated with Bleeding Events.

Discussion

This study investigated risk factors for bleeding in patients receiving FPX after colorectal cancer surgery. Age ≥80 years was associated with an increased bleeding risk. Although not significant, hypertension, BMI ≥25 kg/m2, and antithrombotic therapy tended to be associated with more bleeding events. Previous studies have rarely analyzed bleeding risk in patients receiving pharmacological VTE prophylaxis after surgery, partly because of the heterogeneity in patients' backgrounds, such as disease and surgical procedures. As only patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study, we could analyze the association between bleeding events and patient and surgical characteristics. ACCP guidelines mention some risk factors for bleeding after abdominal surgery, such as male sex, preoperative hemoglobin level <13 g/dl, and complex surgery[11]). However, there was no correlation between these factors and bleeding events in this study. The patient with major bleeding in this study did not have any of the bleeding risk factors discussed in the ACCP guidelines. This may be plausible because the guidelines are based on studies conducted in western countries and did not focus on colorectal cancer surgery. Another Japanese study identified a preoperative platelet count of <15 × 104/μl, male sex, and intraoperative blood loss <50 ml as risk factors for bleeding after colorectal cancer surgery[12]). In this study, the bleeding rate of patients with a preoperative platelet count <15 × 104/μl was relatively high. However, there were 26 such patients and we did not identify an association between preoperative platelet count and bleeding. We found that age ≥80 years was an independent risk factor for bleeding in patients receiving FPX after colorectal cancer surgery. This may be biologically plausible because pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes occur with advanced age, which tend to increase sensitivity to drugs. Reduced functional reserve with aging might also lead to increased sensitivity by impairing homeostatic compensatory mechanisms[13]). There are some limitations to this study. First, due to its retrospective nature, there might be subconscious selection bias. Second, there was no control group. Lastly, the number of bleeding events was relatively small, which might affect the precision of the results. In conclusion, we found that age ≥80 years was an independent risk factor for bleeding in patients receiving FPX after colorectal cancer surgery. Further studies with a larger population are needed to more fully investigate the risk of bleeding.

Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Elastic compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Ashwin Sachdeva; Mark Dalton; Sachiendra V Amaragiri; Timothy Lees
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-07-07

2.  Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; David A Garcia; Sherry M Wren; Paul J Karanicolas; Juan I Arcelus; John A Heit; Charles M Samama
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Combined intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of venous thrombo-embolism in high-risk patients.

Authors:  S K Kakkos; J A Caprini; G Geroulakos; A N Nicolaides; G P Stansby; D J Reddy
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism and deep vein thrombosis (JCS 2009).

Authors: 
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.993

5.  Venous thromboembolism in oesophago-gastric carcinoma: incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic events following chemotherapy and surgery.

Authors:  K E Rollins; C J Peters; P M Safranek; H Ford; T P Baglin; R H Hardwick
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Postoperative pulmonary embolism after hospital discharge. An underestimated risk.

Authors:  O Huber; H Bounameaux; F Borst; A Rohner
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-03

7.  Risk factors for bleeding in major abdominal surgery using heparin thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  A T Cohen; M B Wagner; M S Mohamed
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Current status of pulmonary embolism in general surgery in Japan.

Authors:  Masato Sakon; Ajay K Kakkar; Masataka Ikeda; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Shoji Nakamori; Masahiko Yano; Morito Monden
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Postoperative fatal pulmonary embolism in a general surgical department.

Authors:  M S Rasmussen; P Wille-Jørgensen; L N Jorgensen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Safety of fondaparinux to prevent venous thromboembolism in Japanese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Taishi Hata; Masayoshi Yasui; Kohei Murata; Masaki Okuyama; Masayuki Ohue; Masataka Ikeda; Shigeyuki Ueshima; Kotaro Kitani; Junichi Hasegawa; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Makoto Fujii; Atsushi Ohkawa; Takeshi Kato; Shunji Morita; Takayuki Fukuzaki; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Riichiro Nezu; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.549

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Antithrombotic Therapy on the Outcome of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Takahisa Fujikawa; Ryo Takahashi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-22

2.  Impact of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index as a predictor for postoperative complications after resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Masakatsu Paku; Mamoru Uemura; Masatoshi Kitakaze; Shiki Fujino; Takayuki Ogino; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Hidekazu Takahashi; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Hidetoshi Eguchi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Development and evaluation of a Japanese prediction model for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Masakatsu Paku; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Shiki Fujino; Tsuyoshi Hata; Takayuki Ogino; Hidekazu Takahashi; Mamoru Uemura; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Yuichiro Doki; Hidetoshi Eguchi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.