Literature DB >> 31582643

Role of MafB in macrophages.

Michito Hamada1,2, Yuki Tsunakawa1,3, Hyojung Jeon1,2, Manoj Kumar Yadav1,3, Satoru Takahashi1,2.   

Abstract

The transcription factor MafB regulates macrophage differentiation. However, studies on the phenotype of Mafb-deficient macrophages are still limited. Recently, it was shown that the specific expression of MafB permits macrophages to be distinguished from dendritic cells. In addition, MafB has been reported to be involved in various diseases related to macrophages. Studies using macrophage-specific Mafb-deficient mice show that MafB is linked to atherosclerosis, autoimmunity, obesity, and ischemic stroke, all of which exhibit macrophage abnormality. Therefore, MafB is hypothesized to be indispensable for the regulation of macrophages to maintain systemic homeostasis and may serve as an innovative target for treating macrophage-related diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MafB; homeostasis; large Maf family; macrophage; transcription factor

Year:  2019        PMID: 31582643      PMCID: PMC7004803          DOI: 10.1538/expanim.19-0076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Anim        ISSN: 0007-5124


Introduction

The Maf transcription factor family is a homolog of the v-Maf oncogene, which was identified from the AS42 virus and causes musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma in chicks [58]. The Maf transcription factor is separated into two subfamilies. Large Maf family proteins have a basic domain and a leucine zipper domain (b-Zip) that mediate dimerization and DNA binding and an acidic domain to regulate target gene transcription [32]. In contrast, the small Maf family only contains a b-Zip domain and lacks an acidic domain. Homodimers of small Mafs inhibit target gene transcription, whereas heterodimers regulate target gene transcription depending on the partner protein (Fig. 1) [28]. In mammals, four large Maf proteins (MafA, MafB, c-Maf, and NRL) and three small Maf proteins (MafK, MafG, and MafF) have been identified. All Maf proteins bind to the Maf recognition element (MARE), which is a palindromic sequence, or a MARE half-site in the promoter region of their target gene (Fig. 1b) [32, 80].
Fig. 1.

Structural features of Maf proteins. A. Schematic diagrams of four large Maf and three small Maf protein structures. Their amino acid lengths are indicated on the right side. The small Maf proteins are essentially composed of a carboxy-terminal basic leucine zipper (b-Zip) domain and a DNA-binding domain, whereas the large Maf proteins contain an additional transactivation domain. B. Maf proteins bind as homodimers to two types of target sequences, the classical Maf recognition element (MARE) site and the 5’-AT-rich MARE half-site.

Structural features of Maf proteins. A. Schematic diagrams of four large Maf and three small Maf protein structures. Their amino acid lengths are indicated on the right side. The small Maf proteins are essentially composed of a carboxy-terminal basic leucine zipper (b-Zip) domain and a DNA-binding domain, whereas the large Maf proteins contain an additional transactivation domain. B. Maf proteins bind as homodimers to two types of target sequences, the classical Maf recognition element (MARE) site and the 5’-AT-rich MARE half-site. The expression of large Maf transcription factors has been observed in various tissues. To date, studies using animal models have explained the function of large Mafs in tissue development and cellular differentiation. Expression of MafA and NRL in specific cells, pancreatic β cells and retinal cells, respectively, has been observed, while c-Maf and MafB are expressed in diverse cell types [49, 82]. c-Maf regulates the development of lens fiber cells, mechanoreceptors, T cells, natural killer (NK) T cells, and macrophages [34, 76]. MafB is also expressed in pancreatic α cells, renal podocytes, epidermal keratinocytes, hair follicles, and hematopoietic stem cells and functions in embryonic urethral formation [33, 51,52,53, 65, 71]. Importantly, large Mafs have different target genes depending on the cell type they are expressed in. For instance, c-Maf regulates the interleukin (IL) 4 (IL4) gene in helper T cells, the IL10 gene in macrophages, and crystallin genes in lens fiber cells [7, 34, 38]. MafB also regulates glucagon gene expression in pancreatic α cells, the PTH gene in the parathyroid gland, and C1q genes in macrophages [30, 33, 74]. Thus, this indicates that large Mafs regulate critical genes that define their cell types. Although large Mafs are indispensable for tissue development and cell differentiation, the ectopic expression of large Mafs has an oncogenic function that induces several types of cancer, such as multiple myeloma [5]. In addition, human diseases caused by a point missense mutation in large Mafs have been reported. Mutations in c-MAF cause cataracts [60] and abnormalities in Pacinian corpuscles [76], mutations in MAFA cause insulinomatosis or diabetes mellitus [27], and mutations in NRL induce enhanced S-cone syndrome [45] and retinitis pigmentosa [49]. Mutations in MAFB also cause multicentric carpotarsal osteolysis (MCTO) and Duane retraction syndrome (DRS) with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) [66, 81]. In this way, an abnormal function in a large Maf is responsible for disease onset in various tissues or cell types. Currently, there are limited treatments for most diseases caused by large Mafs, since the precise functions of large Mafs remain unknown. In particular, the functions of c-Maf and MafB in adulthood are unclear due to the embryonic lethality observed in deficient mice. Therefore, further analysis by using conditional knockout mice is required. Macrophages exist in all tissues and have multiple functions, such as the clearance of cell debris and waste products, the maintenance of homeostasis, tissue repair, and innate and adaptive immunity. In various diseases, macrophages are treated as the therapeutic target because of their contribution to disease progression or repair [78]. Although an in vitro analysis was able to categorize macrophages into two subtypes, classical activated macrophages (M1 type) and alternative activated macrophages (M2 type), it seems that this arrangement is not truly applicable in vivo [46, 56]. Considering the multidimensional regulators of macrophages, including ontogeny of the yolk sac and definitive hematopoiesis, disease-derived cytokine signals, and fatty acid and cholesterol signals, it is difficult to understand the whole picture of macrophage functions [18]. In 2000, Kelly et al. reported that the overexpression of MafB induced macrophage differentiation from chick myeloblasts [35]. This finding led us to hypothesize in early 2000 that Mafb deficiency reduces the number of macrophages; thus, we generated Mafb-deficient mice to confirm the relationship between macrophage differentiation and MafB. Although our group and others analyzed the functions of MafB in macrophages using Mafb-deficient mice in 2006, the number of macrophages was not impaired in MafB-null mice, making its phenotype unclear [4, 53]. However, a recent study we performed showed that the functions of MafB are indispensable in disease-related macrophages [22, 69, 74]. In addition, recent evidence indicates that the expression of MafB is also observed in anti-inflammatory-type macrophages. In this review, we summarize the expression and homeostatic functions of MafB in macrophages related to disease development in humans and mice. Moreover, we report that recent evidence indicates that the functions of MafB in macrophages may allow it to serve as a new drug target for diseases related to macrophage accumulation or infiltration; therefore, a complete understanding of MafB in macrophages may help complete the puzzle of macrophage functions.

MafB is Specifically Expressed in Macrophages

In 1994, the Mafb gene was first identified as the causative gene of behavioral defects from impaired inner ear development in Kreisler mice [10]. Kataoka et al. also identified Mafb as a homolog of the oncogene v-Maf in chickens [31]. Sieweke et al. used cell lines and and peritoneal macrophages to show that, out of all the cells in the hematopoietic system, MafB is specifically expressed in macrophages [70]. In the 2000s, transgenic mice with the Mafb promoter labeled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) and mice with GFP knocked-in in the Mafb locus were generated by our group. GFP fluorescence was observed in both CD11b-positive and F4/80 (a macrophage marker)-positive cells within the fetal liver, bone marrow, and peripheral blood [21, 53]. Recent evidence has also validated the expression of Mafb in macrophages. A transcriptome analysis using subtypes of tissue macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) showed that DCs and alveolar macrophages had lower Mafb expression, while Mafb was strongly expressed in splenic macrophages [15]. Originally, it was hypothesized that DCs phagocytose in a similar manner to that of macrophages and that they share common marker genes, making it difficult to distinguish DCs from macrophages [25]. Under normal conditions, MafB is one of the macrophage markers that is reduced in DCs, being a suitable signal to distinguish DCs and macrophages [19, 67]. In addition, macrophages, but not DCs, within tumors also express MafB [14]. MafB lineage-tracing mice with mCherry-Cre knocked-in in the Mafb locus were crossed with Rosa26-stop-YFP mice to identify the cell type that specifically expresses MafB in vivo. YFP expression clearly distinguished macrophage and other cell lineages, including DCs [77]. In human tissue, MAFB is expressed in macrophages in the skin and colon and in melanoma tumors [11]. MAFB expression has also been observed in CD16-positive human monocyte-derived macrophages [26]. Given these results, MafB is a specific macrophage marker in the myeloid lineage and can be used as a substantial marker that distinguishes DCs and macrophages. Genome-wide assays, such as RNA-seq and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) for transposase-accessible chromatin (ATAC-seq) using macrophages, monocytes and neutrophils, have shown that MafB targets the maf-binding motifs in promoter or enhancer regions specific to macrophage genes [43]. This data suggests that large Mafs play a role in macrophages after differentiating from monocytes. In summary, MafB expression is distinctive in macrophages and could be used as an ideal marker for high-throughput analysis.

Expression of MafB in Disease-related Macrophages

Macrophages exist as tissue-resident macrophages in various tissues. However, under abnormal conditions, such as wounds or infection, tissue macrophages induce inflammation, or monocytes infiltrate to the inflammatory region from peripheral blood. Previous reports have shown that MafB is expressed in specific disease-related macrophages or infiltrating macrophages. MafB expression has been observed in infiltrating macrophages at the site of bacterial infections from peripheral blood [2]. In myocardial infarction models, MafB expression was also observed in monocyte-derived MHC-II-positive macrophages [13]. Moreover, MafB is expressed in tumor-associated macrophages in breast cancer [14] and in atherosclerotic regions but not in DCs [8, 9, 22]. In the hind limb ischemia model, MafB was detected in the macrophages that promote angiogenesis, and in renal artery stenosis models, MafB was observed in kidney-resident macrophages that inhibit stenotic kidney injury [42, 61]. In lung fibrosis induced by bleomycin, profibrotic macrophages express MafB [1]. In the brain, MafB is also expressed in tissue-resident microglia in the central nervous system, where a recent report showed that MafB is expressed in activated microglia after peripheral nerve injury of the spinal cord [41, 47, 64]. In human patients with peritoneal dialysis, CD14-positive peritoneal macrophages express MafB [44]. In an in vitro analysis, we showed that MafB is specifically expressed in M-CSF-, IL-10-, and IL-4-derived M2-type macrophages [12]. These reports on in vitro and in vivo evidence of Mafb expression suggest that MafB may play a role in tissue repair or anti-inflammation in various macrophage-related diseases.

The Phenotype of -deficient Macrophages and MafB Target Genes

As described above, accumulating evidence indicates that MafB is specifically expressed in macrophages in many conditions. However, there have been only a few studies using Mafb-deficient mice. In 2006, our group and others published about Mafb-deficient macrophages simultaneously. In these studies, the development and number of macrophages were similar to those of wild-type mice under in vivo conditions [4, 53]. In contrast, our in vitro analysis showed that F4/80 expression was strongly reduced in Mafb-deficient macrophages using a nonadherent culture dish [53]. In addition, enhanced actin organization was observed in Mafb-deficient macrophages in vitro [4]. In 2009, it was identified that macrophages with double knockout (DKO) of MafB and c-Maf have self-renewal ability, even in their terminal differentiation because of the increase in c-Myc and Klf4 in the presence of M-CSF [3]. This report was indeed surprising, yet a phagocytotic analysis using bacteria showed that Mafb and c-Maf DKO macrophages were not different from the control, raising the question of whether other functions of Mafb and c-Maf DKO macrophages are normal or not. In fact, Mafb-deficient macrophages under normal conditions do not have a clear phenotype. An analysis of various diseases using Mafb-deficient mice specifically in hematopoietic cells was recently reported. In atherosclerotic lesions, macrophages uptake oxidized low-density lipoprotein and differentiate into foam cells. To investigate the functions of MafB under these conditions, we transplanted Mafb−/− or control fetal liver cells of embryonic day 14.5 mice into X-ray-irradiated LDL receptor KO mice (Ldlr−/−) and then fed them with high-cholesterol diet to induce atherosclerosis. Mafb-deficient transplanted mice exhibited a reduced atherosclerotic lesion area compared with that of the control. Detailed analysis showed that the expression of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophage (AIM) was strongly reduced in foam cells within the atherosclerotic lesions of Mafb−/− mice. This finding explains why Mafb−/− foam cells induce apoptosis and reduce the area of atherosclerotic lesions. Thus, MafB promotes atherosclerosis by regulating foam cell apoptosis [22]. Moreover, we investigated whether macrophage-specific Mafb-deficient mice were obese after feeding them a high-fat diet. Under these conditions, the size and weight of white adipose tissue increased, and AIM inhibited fat synthesis after uptake by adipocytes. As a reduction in AIM expression was observed in the adipose tissue macrophages of Mafb-deficient mice, AIM reduction may be the cause of obesity in Mafb-deficient mice [73]. Another recent report demonstrated that after inducing ischemic stroke, macrophage-specific Mafb-deficient mice (Mafb) showed excessive inflammation. Because MafB regulates mouse scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1) and macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO), which clears damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), Mafb-deficient macrophages could not inhibit inflammation in the infarct area [69]. Our group also investigated whether MafB is important for efferocytosis (the clearance of apoptotic cells). One million apoptotic cells per second are produced in the human body; however, macrophages immediately engulf apoptotic cells to inhibit autoimmune disease. In our study, Mafb-deficient macrophages could not engulf apoptotic cells due to the reduction in the C1qa, C1qb, and C1qc genes that compose the complement component C1q complex. Luciferase assay and ChIP assay results indicated that MafB directly regulates all C1q genes, since the promoter regions of C1qa, C1qb, and C1qc contain a MARE site. C1q is the first protein involved in the complement component classical pathway, and its deficiency causes autoimmune disease in both humans and mice [6, 68]. Consistent with this evidence, Mafb-deficient mice, under conditions in which apoptotic cells accumulate as a result of X-ray irradiation, exhibited increased autoantibodies and glomerulonephritis. In addition, C1q genes were specifically expressed in macrophages, while other complement components were expressed in hepatocytes. Western blot analysis and a hemolysis assay using serum from macrophage-specific Mafb-deficient (Mafb) mice showed that the amount and activity of C1q were drastically reduced [74]. These data indicate that MafB is indispensable for the regulation of complement component classical pathways. Another group also reported that single-cell RNA sequencing of microglia from Mafb conditional KO mice crossed with Csf1r-Cre transgenic mice showed an increase in the genes related to inflammation and viral infection [47]. Given these findings, we identified the direct target genes of MafB, including F4/80, AIM, C1qa, C1qb, C1qc, and MSR1, by using Mafb mice (Fig. 2) [22, 53, 69, 74]. Most of these genes have distinct roles in macrophage function. In addition to macrophages, Maf transcription factors also directly regulate genes that define the identity of other cell types, such as insulin in β cells, glucagon in alpha cells, crystallin in lens fiber cells, PTH in the parathyroid gland, Il-4 in T helper cells, and rhodopsin in rod cells [30, 33, 34, 38, 49, 82]. Consequently, if the target genes of MafB in macrophages are found, the unknown functions of macrophages can be clarified. Further analyses using various disease-related macrophages of Mafb-deficient mice would open the next door of macrophage research.
Fig. 2.

Schematic model of the major regulatory factors of MafB induced by an external stimulus. In macrophages, MafB is regulated by food, cell debris, and waste via the regulation of nuclear receptor transcription factors, and it is also controlled by inflammatory signals such as microRNAs or cytokines (left panel). The right table shows macrophage phenotypes and target genes in macrophages involved in several diseases.

Schematic model of the major regulatory factors of MafB induced by an external stimulus. In macrophages, MafB is regulated by food, cell debris, and waste via the regulation of nuclear receptor transcription factors, and it is also controlled by inflammatory signals such as microRNAs or cytokines (left panel). The right table shows macrophage phenotypes and target genes in macrophages involved in several diseases. Because MafB targets a specific gene, we identified a common point between the target genes, the large Mafs, and evolution. The sea lamprey, which belongs to the jawless vertebrates, has one large Maf. All fishes other than the sea lamprey have four large Mafs, which seem to increase through genome modifications such as gene duplication [37]. In addition to large Mafs, the sea lamprey has immature marco, msr1 (sr-a), AIM, and C1q-like genes in its genome [48, 64, 79]. Fishes that evolved after the lamprey have acquired their gene functions as their innate immunity has evolved. Consistent with these results, it was reported that the phagocytes of the sea lamprey have less protection against microbes, as protection against microbes was acquired after fishes that evolved after the lamprey, and heterogeneity to distinguish the proinflammatory type and maintain the homeostatic type [23]. Thus, acquiring the polarity of macrophages may be related to the timing of the gene duplication of large Mafs. In addition, MARE sequences in the promoter or enhancer region of target genes must be important. The comparison of not only target genes but also promoter or enhancer regions may be important for understanding the mechanism of macrophage evolution.

Regulators of MafB Expression

MafB functions in various tissues and stages of development. However, it is critical for it to be expressed at the right time and location depending on the physiological condition. Retinoic acid is the ligand of the nuclear receptor-type transcription factor retinoic acid receptor (RAR). An analysis of the rhombomere revealed the importance of the concentration of retinoic acid in regulation of MafB, which receives signals from RAR [20]. Moreover, recent studies have illustrated the importance of several nuclear receptor-type transcription factors, especially in macrophages. Macrophages at atherosclerotic lesions are reported to take in oxLDL, which leads to the production of oxysterol the ligand of liver X receptor (LXR). In turn, a heterodimer of LXR and retinoid X receptor (RXR) activated with oxysterol regulates the expression of MafB. In fact, LXR-deficient macrophages also exhibit reduced MafB expression [22]. In addition, the MafB target gene C1q is activated by nuclear receptors such as PPARδ, PPARγ and RXR [54, 62]. A study we performed further proved that PPARδ, LXR, RAR, and GR regulate C1q by increasing the expression of MafB [74]. Furthermore, RXR homodimers are involved in osteoclast differentiation through regulation of the expression of MafB [50]. MafB is also upregulated by certain cytokine signals, including M-CSF, IL-10, IL-4, and IL-13, and downregulated by GM-CSF and LPS [11, 12, 17]. In humans, vitamin D3/Hox-A10 regulates MafB expression during the differentiation of CD34+ cells to monocytes [16]. In the sense of monocyte and macrophage differentiation, transcription factor for immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer 3 (TFE3) binds to the human MAFB promoter region, and retinoic acid and TNF-alpha regulate the expression of MafB in the human monocyte cell line, THP-1 [83]. MafB is a target of miR-155, and miR-155 induces inflammatory macrophages [29, 36]. In contrast, miR-152 is reported to target MafB in microglia [72]. MafB is similarly regulated by various signals, including lipid metabolism, immunological regulators, and microRNAs (Fig. 2). Overall, these reports indicate the importance of MafB in various functions that maintain the homeostasis of macrophages.

Pathologies

There have been a few studies regarding pathologies that are caused by a missense mutation at the transactivation domain of the Mafb gene. MCTO is a rare skeletal and nephropathic disorder, with its classical symptoms appearing as specific osteolysis at the carpal and tarsal bones [55, 81]. Since all carpal bones are present in MCTO patients during childhood and osteolysis progressively occurs as patients age, MCTO is hypothesized to be caused by excessive bone resorption [40, 84]. The expression of MafB reported by Kim et al. in 2007 also supports this hypothesis, revealing the need to analyze the link between MCTO and the functions of MafB in osteoclasts [39]. Moreover, the missense mutation in the transactivation domain of MafB is thought to interact with the functions of MafB as a transcription factor. However, studies on several point mutations in this domain of MAF proteins have shown that these mutations are clustered at the phosphorylation sites targeted by GSK3, which in turn affect the stability of MafB itself (Fig. 3) [24, 57]. Our group generated homozygous mice harboring the MCTO mutation that exhibited nephropathy similar to that of human MCTO patients [75]. Future work will focus on the bone and macrophage phenotypes of these mice to elucidate the potential risks and ideal therapeutic approaches against MCTO.
Fig. 3.

Domain structure and the location of mutations in the human MAFB protein. Each position indicates the amino acid substitution of the observed mutations in patients where mutations were previously reported for multicentric carpotarsal osteolysis (MCTO) and Duane syndrome. The osteolysis disorder MCTO is known to be caused by a dominant missense mutation in the transactivation domain. A mutation in the zinc finger DNA-binding domain of MafB may also cause DRS.

Domain structure and the location of mutations in the human MAFB protein. Each position indicates the amino acid substitution of the observed mutations in patients where mutations were previously reported for multicentric carpotarsal osteolysis (MCTO) and Duane syndrome. The osteolysis disorder MCTO is known to be caused by a dominant missense mutation in the transactivation domain. A mutation in the zinc finger DNA-binding domain of MafB may also cause DRS. DRS is another disorder related to a mutation in MafB that differs from MCTO at the site of the mutation along the MafB gene [59]. DRS is caused by a mutation in the DNA-binding domain of MafB, with patients suffering from defects in the abducens nerves, FSGS, and dysacusis but exhibiting no major abnormalities in hematological signatures (Fig. 3) [59, 66]. Interestingly, homozygous mice with the Duane syndrome mutation and ENU-induced DNA-binding domain-mutated mice are incapable of surviving soon after birth [63]. Since this lethal phenotype is similar to that of Mafb-deficient mice, mutations in the DNA-binding domain may reflect the loss of MafB function. It is possible that more patients with Mafb mutations in the DNA-binding domain will be diagnosed with symptoms that could be different from those in previous reports. Therefore, it is important to deeply analyze our mutant mice to uncover the possible symptoms that DRS patients could show.

Conclusion

The functions of MafB in macrophages have been slowly revealed for the past 20 years. These functions can be summarized as a regulator of specific genes in various types of macrophages, such as tissue-specific macrophages, tissue repairing macrophages at pathological lesions, and macrophages exposed to lipid/cholesterol-rich environments. The studies discussed in this review illustrate that MafB may function particularly in macrophages that restrain the immune system and maintain homeostasis. In addition, whole genome sequencing has been applied to diseases with unknown causes, showing mutation of MAFB as the reason for DRS and MCTO. It is possible that accumulation of such findings may clarify and increase the number of patients diagnosed with a mutation in the MAFB gene. Therefore, precise analysis of Mafb-mutated mice may help to predicting other phenotypes of patients to build the basis for both prevention and treatment.
  84 in total

1.  Sexually dimorphic expression of Mafb regulates masculinization of the embryonic urethral formation.

Authors:  Kentaro Suzuki; Tomokazu Numata; Hiroko Suzuki; Dennis Diana Raga; Lerrie Ann Ipulan; Chikako Yokoyama; Shoko Matsushita; Michito Hamada; Naomi Nakagata; Ryuichi Nishinakamura; Shoen Kume; Satoru Takahashi; Gen Yamada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multicentric carpotarsal osteolysis syndrome is caused by only a few domain-specific mutations in MAFB, a negative regulator of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis.

Authors:  Steven Mumm; Margaret Huskey; Shenghui Duan; Deborah Wenkert; Katherine L Madson; Gary S Gottesman; Angela R Nenninger; Ronald M Laxer; William H McAlister; Michael P Whyte
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  MafB is a downstream target of the IL-10/STAT3 signaling pathway, involved in the regulation of macrophage de-activation.

Authors:  Claudia Gemelli; Tommaso Zanocco Marani; Silvio Bicciato; Emilia M C Mazza; Diana Boraschi; Valentina Salsi; Vincenzo Zappavigna; Sandra Parenti; Tommaso Selmi; Enrico Tagliafico; Sergio Ferrari; Alexis Grande
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-01-25

Review 4.  Transcriptional Regulation and Macrophage Differentiation.

Authors:  David A Hume; Kim M Summers; Michael Rehli
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2016-06

5.  Microglia development follows a stepwise program to regulate brain homeostasis.

Authors:  Orit Matcovitch-Natan; Deborah R Winter; Amir Giladi; Stephanie Vargas Aguilar; Amit Spinrad; Sandrine Sarrazin; Hila Ben-Yehuda; Eyal David; Fabiola Zelada González; Pierre Perrin; Hadas Keren-Shaul; Meital Gury; David Lara-Astaiso; Christoph A Thaiss; Merav Cohen; Keren Bahar Halpern; Kuti Baruch; Aleksandra Deczkowska; Erika Lorenzo-Vivas; Shalev Itzkovitz; Eran Elinav; Michael H Sieweke; Michal Schwartz; Ido Amit
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Nrl is required for rod photoreceptor development.

Authors:  A J Mears; M Kondo; P K Swain; Y Takada; R A Bush; T L Saunders; P A Sieving; A Swaroop
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Multicentric carpotarsal osteolysis syndrome: long-term follow-up of three patients.

Authors:  Céline Klein; Jonathan Bellity; Georges Finidori; Christophe Glorion; Stéphanie Pannier
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The cellular and molecular origin of tumor-associated macrophages.

Authors:  Ruth A Franklin; Will Liao; Abira Sarkar; Myoungjoo V Kim; Michael R Bivona; Kang Liu; Eric G Pamer; Ming O Li
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A mutation in transcription factor MAFB causes Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis with Duane Retraction Syndrome.

Authors:  Yoshinori Sato; Hiroyasu Tsukaguchi; Hiroyuki Morita; Koichiro Higasa; Mai Thi Nhu Tran; Michito Hamada; Toshiaki Usui; Naoki Morito; Shoichiro Horita; Takao Hayashi; Junko Takagi; Izumi Yamaguchi; Huan Thanh Nguyen; Masayo Harada; Kiyoko Inui; Yuichi Maruta; Yoshihiko Inoue; Fumihiko Koiwa; Hiroshi Sato; Fumihiko Matsuda; Shinya Ayabe; Seiya Mizuno; Fumihiro Sugiyama; Satoru Takahashi; Ashio Yoshimura
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage.

Authors:  Dvir Aran; Agnieszka P Looney; Leqian Liu; Esther Wu; Valerie Fong; Austin Hsu; Suzanna Chak; Ram P Naikawadi; Paul J Wolters; Adam R Abate; Atul J Butte; Mallar Bhattacharya
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 25.606

View more
  14 in total

1.  A multiancestry genome-wide association study of unexplained chronic ALT elevation as a proxy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with histological and radiological validation.

Authors:  Marijana Vujkovic; Shweta Ramdas; Daniel J Rader; Benjamin F Voight; Kyong-Mi Chang; Kim M Lorenz; Xiuqing Guo; Rebecca Darlay; Heather J Cordell; Jing He; Yevgeniy Gindin; Chuhan Chung; Robert P Myers; Carolin V Schneider; Joseph Park; Kyung Min Lee; Marina Serper; Rotonya M Carr; David E Kaplan; Mary E Haas; Matthew T MacLean; Walter R Witschey; Xiang Zhu; Catherine Tcheandjieu; Rachel L Kember; Henry R Kranzler; Anurag Verma; Ayush Giri; Derek M Klarin; Yan V Sun; Jie Huang; Jennifer E Huffman; Kate Townsend Creasy; Nicholas J Hand; Ching-Ti Liu; Michelle T Long; Jie Yao; Matthew Budoff; Jingyi Tan; Xiaohui Li; Henry J Lin; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Kent D Taylor; Ruey-Kang Chang; Ronald M Krauss; Silvia Vilarinho; Joseph Brancale; Jonas B Nielsen; Adam E Locke; Marcus B Jones; Niek Verweij; Aris Baras; K Rajender Reddy; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Arun J Sanyal; Naga Chalasani; Kathleen A Ryan; Braxton D Mitchell; Dipender Gill; Andrew D Wells; Elisabetta Manduchi; Yedidya Saiman; Nadim Mahmud; Donald R Miller; Peter D Reaven; Lawrence S Phillips; Sumitra Muralidhar; Scott L DuVall; Jennifer S Lee; Themistocles L Assimes; Saiju Pyarajan; Kelly Cho; Todd L Edwards; Scott M Damrauer; Peter W Wilson; J Michael Gaziano; Christopher J O'Donnell; Amit V Khera; Struan F A Grant; Christopher D Brown; Philip S Tsao; Danish Saleheen; Luca A Lotta; Lisa Bastarache; Quentin M Anstee; Ann K Daly; James B Meigs; Jerome I Rotter; Julie A Lynch
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 41.307

2.  Digital Cell Atlas of Mouse Uterus: From Regenerative Stage to Maturational Stage.

Authors:  Leyi Zhang; Wenying Long; Wanwan Xu; Xiuying Chen; Xiaofeng Zhao; Bingbing Wu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  PGE2 accounts for bidirectional changes in alveolar macrophage self-renewal with aging and smoking.

Authors:  Loka R Penke; Jennifer M Speth; Christina Draijer; Zbigniew Zaslona; Judy Chen; Peter Mancuso; Christine M Freeman; Jeffrey L Curtis; Daniel R Goldstein; Marc Peters-Golden
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2020-08-20

4.  MAF bZIP Transcription Factor B (MAFB) Protected Against Ovalbumin-Induced Allergic Rhinitis via the Alleviation of Inflammation by Restoring the T Helper (Th) 1/Th2/Th17 Imbalance and Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Tiancong Liu; Weiliang Bai
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2022-02-25

5.  Islet transplantation into brown adipose tissue can delay immune rejection.

Authors:  Jessica D Kepple; Jessie M Barra; Martin E Young; Chad S Hunter; Hubert M Tse
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-02-22

6.  Functional reprogramming of monocytes in patients with acute and convalescent severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Elisa Brauns; Abdulkader Azouz; David Grimaldi; Hanxi Xiao; Séverine Thomas; Muriel Nguyen; Véronique Olislagers; Ines Vu Duc; Carmen Orte Cano; Véronique Del Marmol; Pieter Pannus; Frédérick Libert; Sven Saussez; Nicolas Dauby; Jishnu Das; Arnaud Marchant; Stanislas Goriely
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 7.  Thymic Microenvironment: Interactions Between Innate Immune Cells and Developing Thymocytes.

Authors:  Helen Wang; Juan Carlos Zúñiga-Pflücker
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 8.786

8.  Single Cell RNA Sequencing Identifies a Unique Inflammatory Macrophage Subset as a Druggable Target for Alleviating Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Weijian Yao; Ying Chen; Zehua Li; Jing Ji; Abin You; Shanzhao Jin; Yuan Ma; Youlu Zhao; Jinwei Wang; Lei Qu; Hui Wang; Chengang Xiang; Suxia Wang; Gang Liu; Fan Bai; Li Yang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 17.521

9.  Zebrafish mafbb Mutants Display Osteoclast Over-Activation and Bone Deformity Resembling Osteolysis in MCTO Patients.

Authors:  Yujie Han; Weihao Shao; Dan Zhong; Cui Ma; Xiaona Wei; Abrar Ahmed; Tingting Yu; Wei Jing; Lili Jing
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-03-23

10.  Identification of Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers and Biological Pathways in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Based on Bioinformatics Analysis.

Authors:  Tingyan Yu; Zhaoxu Huang; Zhaoxia Pu
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.