Literature DB >> 31582528

Functional Localization of the Frontal Eye Fields in the Common Marmoset Using Microstimulation.

Janahan Selvanayagam1,2, Kevin D Johnston1,3, David J Schaeffer2, Lauren K Hayrynen2, Stefan Everling4,3,2.   

Abstract

The frontal eye field (FEF) is a critical region for the deployment of overt and covert spatial attention. Although investigations in the macaque continue to provide insight into the neural underpinnings of the FEF, due to its location within a sulcus, the macaque FEF is virtually inaccessible to electrophysiological techniques such as high-density and laminar recordings. With a largely lissencephalic cortex, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is a promising alternative primate model for studying FEF microcircuitry. Putative homologies have been established with the macaque FEF on the basis of cytoarchitecture and connectivity; however, physiological investigation in awake, behaving marmosets is necessary to physiologically locate this area. Here, we addressed this gap using intracortical microstimulation in a broad range of frontal cortical areas in three adult marmosets (two males, one female). We implanted marmosets with 96-channel Utah arrays and applied microstimulation trains while they freely viewed video clips. We evoked short-latency fixed vector saccades at low currents (<50 μA) in areas 45, 8aV, 8C, and 6DR. We observed a topography of saccade direction and amplitude consistent with findings in macaques and humans: small saccades in ventrolateral FEF and large saccades combined with contralateral neck and shoulder movements encoded in dorsomedial FEF. Our data provide compelling evidence supporting homology between marmoset and macaque FEF and suggest that the marmoset is a useful primate model for investigating FEF microcircuitry and its contributions to oculomotor and cognitive functions.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The frontal eye field (FEF) is a critical cortical region for overt and covert spatial attention. The microcircuitry of this area remains poorly understood because in the macaque, the most commonly used model, it is embedded within a sulcus and is inaccessible to modern electrophysiological and imaging techniques. The common marmoset is a promising alternative primate model due to its lissencephalic cortex and potential for genetic manipulation. However, evidence for homologous cortical areas in this model remains limited and unclear. Here, we applied microstimulation in frontal cortical areas in marmosets to physiologically identify FEF. Our results provide compelling evidence for an FEF in the marmoset and suggest that the marmoset is a useful model for investigating FEF microcircuitry.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  common marmoset; frontal cortex; frontal eye fields; microstimulation; saccade

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31582528      PMCID: PMC6855691          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1786-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  32 in total

1.  Contribution of the frontal eye field to gaze shifts in the head-unrestrained monkey: effects of microstimulation.

Authors:  Thomas A Knight; Albert F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Topography of Visuomotor Parameters in the Frontal and Premotor Eye Fields.

Authors:  Helen E Savaki; Georgia G Gregoriou; Sophia Bakola; Adonis K Moschovakis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Cytoarchitectural characteristic of the frontal eye fields in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  G B Stanton; S Y Deng; M E Goldberg; N T McMullen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion.

Authors:  Xiangrui Li; Paul S Morgan; John Ashburner; Jolinda Smith; Christopher Rorden
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Methods for chair restraint and training of the common marmoset on oculomotor tasks.

Authors:  Kevin D Johnston; Kevin Barker; Lauren Schaeffer; David Schaeffer; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Evidence for a supplementary eye field.

Authors:  J Schlag; M Schlag-Rey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effect of eye position within the orbit on electrically elicited saccadic eye movements: a comparison of the macaque monkey's frontal and supplementary eye fields.

Authors:  G S Russo; C J Bruce
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Primate supplementary eye field: I. Comparative aspects of mesencephalic and pontine connections.

Authors:  B L Shook; M Schlag-Rey; J Schlag
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-11-22       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Microstimulation and architectonics of frontoparietal cortex in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Mark J Burish; Iwona Stepniewska; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Eye movements induced by electrical stimulation of the frontal eye fields of marmosets and squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  B Blum; J J Kulikowski; D Carden; D Harwood
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.808

View more
  7 in total

1.  Functional Organization of Frontoparietal Cortex in the Marmoset Investigated with Awake Resting-State fMRI.

Authors:  Yuki Hori; Justine C Cléry; David J Schaeffer; Ravi S Menon; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.861

2.  An open access resource for functional brain connectivity from fully awake marmosets.

Authors:  David J Schaeffer; L Martyn Klassen; Yuki Hori; Xiaoguang Tian; Diego Szczupak; Cecil Chern-Chyi Yen; Justine C Cléry; Kyle M Gilbert; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; CiRong Liu; Stefan Everling; Afonso C Silva
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 7.400

3.  Cortico-Subcortical Functional Connectivity Profiles of Resting-State Networks in Marmosets and Humans.

Authors:  Yuki Hori; David J Schaeffer; Atsushi Yoshida; Justine C Cléry; Lauren K Hayrynen; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Visual Neuroscience Methods for Marmosets: Efficient Receptive Field Mapping and Head-Free Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Patrick Jendritza; Frederike J Klein; Gustavo Rohenkohl; Pascal Fries
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 5.  Marmosets: a promising model for probing the neural mechanisms underlying complex visual networks such as the frontal-parietal network.

Authors:  Joanita F D'Souza; Nicholas S C Price; Maureen A Hagan
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  The effect of ketamine on eye movement characteristics during free-viewing of natural images in common marmosets.

Authors:  Zlata Polyakova; Masao Iwase; Ryota Hashimoto; Masatoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Marmoset Monkeys.

Authors:  David J Schaeffer; CiRong Liu; Afonso C Silva; Stefan Everling
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2020-12-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.