Literature DB >> 31582438

Genome Sequences of Three Lactobacillus Species Strains of the Stomach of the White-Footed Deermouse (Peromyscus leucopus).

Khalil Bassam1, Ana Milovic1, Alan G Barbour2,3.   

Abstract

Three colony types of Lactobacillus were isolated from the stomach of LL colony stock Peromyscus leucopus deermice, a reservoir for several human zoonoses. Genome sequences revealed two isolates to be new strains of Lactobacillus animalis and Lactobacillus reuteri The third was distinct from known species and was provisionally designated Lactobacillus sp. strain LL6.
Copyright © 2019 Bassam et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31582438      PMCID: PMC6776778          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00963-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Peromyscus leucopus, a widely distributed, abundant mammal in North America, is an important reservoir for agents of tick-borne zoonoses, including Lyme disease, babesiosis, anaplasmosis, and a viral encephalitis (1). The genus Peromyscus clusters with hamsters and voles rather than with murids such as Mus musculus (2). P. leucopus is the target for field-delivered oral vaccines (3), but little is known about the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota of this or other Peromyscus species. During study of the GI tract of animals of P. leucopus LL stock (Peromyscus Genetic Stock Center, University of South Carolina), we identified three types of Lactobacillus in the stomachs, ceca, and feces of both females and males. The organisms were isolated from stomach contents on Rogosa SL agar (Sigma-Aldrich) plates in a candle jar at 37°C and were distinguished by colony morphologies. Single colonies of each were cultivated in Difco MRS broth (Becton, Dickinson). High-molecular-weight genomic DNA was extracted from harvested cells with a Qiagen Genomic-tip 100/G kit. Their genomes were sequenced by two methods, (i) for long reads on an Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) MinION Mk1B instrument with a ligation sequencing kit, R9.4.1 flow cell, MinKNOW v. 19.6.8 for primary data acquisition, and Guppy v. 3.2.4 for base calling with default settings and (ii) for short reads on an Illumina MiSeq instrument with paired-end v2 microchemistry and 150 cycles. The library was constructed using the NEXTflex rapid DNA-seq kit (Bioo Scientific), the quality of sequencing reads was analyzed using FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics), and reads were trimmed of Phred scores of <15 and corrected for poor-quality bases using Trimmomatic (4). A hybrid assembly of each genome was carried out with Unicycler v. 0.4.7 (5) with default settings and 16 threads on the high-performance computing cluster of the University of California Irvine. Complete, circularly permuted chromosomes were obtained for two of the isolates (LL1 and LL7), and two contigs of 1.75 Mb and 0.32 Mb, respectively, were obtained for the third (LL6) (Table 1). Annotation was provided by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (6). By the criterion of 16S ribosomal sequence identity of ≥99%, isolates LL1 and LL7 were identified as Lactobacillus animalis and Lactobacillus reuteri, respectively. Other sequences of these organisms confirmed those classifications.
Table 1

Resources from this study, sequencing statistics, and characteristics of chromosomes and plasmids of three Lactobacillus spp.

SpeciesStrainBioProject accession no.BioSample accession no.SRA accession no. (Illumina, ONT)No. of ONT reads (×106)/N50 (kb)Mean coverage (×)
Size (bp)
G+C content (%)
GenBank accession no.
ONTIlluminaChromosomePlasmidChromosomePlasmidChromosome(s)Plasmid
Lactobacillus animalisLL1PRJNA533837SAMN11468794 SRX5831611,SRX58316122.31/6.112,0981822,280,5774,01641.037.1CP039849MK858222
Lactobacillus reuteriLL7PRJNA554696SAMN12280509 SRX6494060,SRX64940611.52/0.874232182,205,740178,97738.938.1CP041676CP041677
Lactobacillus sp.LL6PRJNA554698SAMN12280527 SRX6492358,SRX64923572.73/6.212,6012782,067,2366,96933.536.4 VLLR01000001 (contig 1),VLLR01000002 (contig 1)VLLR01000003
Resources from this study, sequencing statistics, and characteristics of chromosomes and plasmids of three Lactobacillus spp. L. reuteri LL7 had another replicon (Table 1) that had coding sequences for a Rep_3 (pfam01051) plasmid replication initiation protein and multiple transposases. This is consistent with a type of megaplasmid observed in other lactobacilli (7). Isolate LL6 could be not be identified with a known Lactobacillus species in the genome database. Over its full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence, the closest organism was Lactobacillus amylolyticus at 95.6% nucleotide identity. The identities of LL6’s coding sequences for the core genome genes recA, rpoB, gyrA, and rplB were no more than 83%, 87%, 81%, and 94%, respectively, with any other Lactobacillus sp. These distances suggest that this represents a previously unknown taxon, provisionally designated Lactobacillus sp. strain LL6.

Data availability.

The strains described here are available from the corresponding author. Table 1 provides the publicly available resources from this study with hyperlinks to repositories.
  7 in total

1.  Oral vaccine that breaks the transmission cycle of the Lyme disease spirochete can be delivered via bait.

Authors:  Maria J C Gomes-Solecki; Dustin R Brisson; Raymond J Dattwyler
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Multireplicon genome architecture of Lactobacillus salivarius.

Authors:  Marcus J Claesson; Yin Li; Sinead Leahy; Carlos Canchaya; Jan Peter van Pijkeren; Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga; Julian Parkhill; Sarah Flynn; Gerald C O'Sullivan; J Kevin Collins; Des Higgins; Fergus Shanahan; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Douwe van Sinderen; Paul W O'Toole
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Infection resistance and tolerance in Peromyscus spp., natural reservoirs of microbes that are virulent for humans.

Authors:  Alan G Barbour
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Peromyscus mice as a model for studying natural variation.

Authors:  Nicole L Bedford; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads.

Authors:  Ryan R Wick; Louise M Judd; Claire L Gorrie; Kathryn E Holt
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation.

Authors:  Daniel H Haft; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Brover; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Kathleen O'Neill; Wenjun Li; Farideh Chitsaz; Myra K Derbyshire; Noreen R Gonzales; Marc Gwadz; Fu Lu; Gabriele H Marchler; James S Song; Narmada Thanki; Roxanne A Yamashita; Chanjuan Zheng; Françoise Thibaud-Nissen; Lewis Y Geer; Aron Marchler-Bauer; Kim D Pruitt
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Lactobacilli and other gastrointestinal microbiota of Peromyscus leucopus, reservoir host for agents of Lyme disease and other zoonoses in North America.

Authors:  Ana Milovic; Khalil Bassam; Hanjuan Shao; Ioulia Chatzistamou; Danielle M Tufts; Maria Diuk-Wasser; Alan G Barbour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.