Literature DB >> 31582355

Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Ken Kato1, Byoung Chul Cho2, Masanobu Takahashi3, Morihito Okada4, Chen-Yuan Lin5, Keisho Chin6, Shigenori Kadowaki7, Myung-Ju Ahn8, Yasuo Hamamoto9, Yuichiro Doki10, Chueh-Chuan Yen11, Yutaro Kubota12, Sung-Bae Kim13, Chih-Hung Hsu14, Eva Holtved15, Ioannis Xynos16, Mamoru Kodani17, Yuko Kitagawa18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy for patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma offers poor long-term survival prospects. We report the final analysis from our study of the immune checkpoint PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (ATTRACTION-3) at 90 hospitals and cancer centres in Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA. We enrolled patients aged 20 years and older with unresectable advanced or recurrent oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (regardless of PD-L1 expression), at least one measurable or non-measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and who were refractory or intolerant to one previous fluoropyrimidine-based and platinum-based chemotherapy and had a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either nivolumab (240 mg for 30 min every 2 weeks) or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 for at least 60 min once per week for 6 weeks then 1 week off; or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 for at least 60 min every 3 weeks), all given intravenously. Treatment continued until disease progression assessed by the investigator per RECIST version 1.1 or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was done using an interactive web response system with a block size of four and stratified according to geographical region (Japan vs rest of the world), number of organs with metastases, and PD-L1 expression. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation until death from any cause, in the intention-to-treat population that included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02569242, and follow-up for long-term outcomes is ongoing.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 7, 2016, and May 25, 2017, we assigned 419 patients to treatment: 210 to nivolumab and 209 to chemotherapy. At the time of data cutoff on Nov 12, 2018, median follow-up for overall survival was 10·5 months (IQR 4·5-19·0) in the nivolumab group and 8·0 months (4·6-15·2) in the chemotherapy group. At a minimum follow-up time (ie, time from random assignment of the last patient to data cutoff) of 17·6 months, overall survival was significantly improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group (median 10·9 months, 95% CI 9·2-13·3 vs 8·4 months, 7·2-9·9; hazard ratio for death 0·77, 95% CI 0·62-0·96; p=0·019). 38 (18%) of 209 patients in the nivolumab group had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events compared with 131 (63%) of 208 patients in the chemotherapy group. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were anaemia (four [2%]) in the nivolumab group and decreased neutrophil count (59 [28%]) in the chemotherapy group. Five deaths were deemed treatment-related: two in the nivolumab group (one each of interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis) and three in the chemotherapy group (one each of pneumonia, spinal cord abscess, and interstitial lung disease).
INTERPRETATION: Nivolumab was associated with a significant improvement in overall survivaland a favourable safety profile compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and might represent a new standard second-line treatment option for these patients. FUNDING: ONO Pharmaceutical Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31582355     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30626-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  229 in total

1.  Benefit-Risk Summary of Nivolumab for the Treatment of Patients with Unresectable Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Prior Fluoropyrimidine- and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lorraine Pelosof; May Tun Saung; Martha Donoghue; Sandra Casak; Sirisha Mushti; Joyce Cheng; Xiling Jiang; Jiang Liu; Hong Zhao; Maryam Khazraee; Kirsten B Goldberg; Marc Theoret; Steven Lemery; Richard Pazdur; Lola Fashoyin-Aje
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-01-11

2.  Newly developed primary malignancies in long-term survivors who underwent curative esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Dai Shimizu; Masahiko Koike; Mitsuro Kanda; Fuminori Sonohara; Norifumi Hattori; Masamichi Hayashi; Chie Tanaka; Suguru Yamada; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Associations of PD-L1, PD-L2, and HLA class I expression with responses to immunotherapy in patients with advanced sarcoma: post hoc analysis of a phase 1/2 trial.

Authors:  S Miwa; T Nojima; A A Alomesen; H Ikeda; N Yamamoto; H Nishida; K Hayashi; A Takeuchi; K Igarashi; T Higuchi; H Yonezawa; Y Araki; S Morinaga; Y Asano; H Tsuchiya
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Safety and antibody immune response of CHP-NY-ESO-1 vaccine combined with poly-ICLC in advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Takeshi Ishikawa; Shinichi Kageyama; Yoshihiro Miyahara; Tetsuya Okayama; Satoshi Kokura; Linan Wang; Eiichi Sato; Hideo Yagita; Yoshito Itoh; Hiroshi Shiku
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.968

5.  Itraconazole Exerts Its Antitumor Effect in Esophageal Cancer By Suppressing the HER2/AKT Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Ankur S Bhagwath; Zeeshan Ramzan; Taylor A Williams; Indhumathy Subramaniyan; Vindhya Edpuganti; Raja Reddy Kallem; Kerry B Dunbar; Peiguo Ding; Ke Gong; Samuel A Geurkink; Muhammad S Beg; James Kim; Qiuyang Zhang; Amyn A Habib; Sung-Hee Choi; Ritu Lapsiwala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Jonathan E Dowell; Shelby D Melton; Chunfa Jie; William C Putnam; Thai H Pham; David H Wang
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Prognostic value of PD-L1 expression on immune cells or tumor cells for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Ta-Chen Huang; Cher-Wei Liang; Yu-I Li; Jhe-Cyuan Guo; Chia-Chi Lin; Ya-Jhen Chen; Ann-Lii Cheng; Chih-Hung Hsu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Complete response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and capecitabine in microsatellite stable, Epstein-Barr virus-positive, locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: case report.

Authors:  Ching Ying Lin; Pareen Mehta; Kevin M Waters; Elena Chang; Andrew Hendifar; Arsen Osipov; Miguel Burch; De-Chen Lin; Alexandra Gangi; May Cho; Jun Gong
Journal:  AME Case Rep       Date:  2021-07-25

8.  Nivolumab effective in oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Diana Romero
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Multimodality approaches to control esophageal cancer: development of chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kakeji; Taro Oshikiri; Gosuke Takiguchi; Shingo Kanaji; Takeru Matsuda; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.230

Review 10.  Immunotherapy in gastroesophageal cancers: Current state and future directions.

Authors:  Hira Shaikh; Amir Kamran; Dulabh K Monga
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.