| Literature DB >> 31581599 |
Maojiang Zhang1,2,3, Minglei Wang4,5, Mingxing Zhang6,7, Long Qiu8, Yinjie Liu9, Wenli Zhang10,11, Yumei Zhang12, Jiangtao Hu13, Guozhong Wu14,15.
Abstract
Functional textiles with unique functions, including free cutting, embroidery and changeable shape, will be attractive for smart wear ofEntities:
Keywords: Fe3O4 nanowire; humidity sensor; respiration monitoring; silver
Year: 2019 PMID: 31581599 PMCID: PMC6835934 DOI: 10.3390/nano9101399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) Schematic fabrication process of the Ag@Fe3O4-MS sensor. (b) Ordinary fabric for cutting and sewing; a planar and strictly wafer-based sensor. (c) Illustration and (d) Photographs of humidity sensor: three-sublayered conductive architectures of the prepared Ag@Fe3O4-MS fabric sensor; e-fabric maintains the cutting and sewing properties of ordinary fabric. (e) Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image and energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) mapping image of Ag@Fe3O4-MS. Surface layer: 100 μm; subsurface layer: 700 μm.
Figure 2SEM images of (a,b) PP-g-PAO/Fe3O4 and (c,d) Ag@Fe3O4-MS. (e,f) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of PP, PP-g-PAN, PP-g-PAO, PP-g-PAO/Fe3O4 and Ag@Fe3O4-MS.
Figure 3(a) Homemade humidity test system. (b) The repeatability characteristic of Ag@Fe3O4-MS at RH = 11–95%. The specimen dimensions are 20 mm length and 15 mm width. (c) Plot of log10 (I) for Ag@Fe3O4-MS versus relative humidity (RH). (d) Responses of the sensor with respect to RH.
Figure 4Free-cutting properties: (a) specific shapes and dimensions corresponding to (b). Insert: the electrodes of Ag@Fe3O4-MS can be constructed directly without silver paste and tailored to desired shapes. (b) Dependence of relative current on the dimensions and shapes of Ag@Fe3O4-MS at RH = 85%.
Figure 5Schematic diagram of the sensing mechanism of Ag@Fe3O4-MS at high and low RH.
Comparison of the Typical Parameters of Different humidity sensors.
| Substrate | Sensor Materials | Flexible or Rigid | Free-Cutting | Detection Range (% RH) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Si | SnO2 NWs | rigid | no | 30–85 | [ |
| poly(ethylene terephthalate) | TiO2 NWs | flexible | no | 20–90 | [ |
| SiO/Si | ZnO NWs | rigid | no | 10–90 | [ |
| Polyurethane | Ag NWs | flexible | no | 0–80 | [ |
| Polypropylene | Ag/Fe3O4 NWs | flexible | free cutting/embroidery | 11–95 | This work |
Figure 6(a) Photograph of a human volunteer wearing a medical respirator with the humidity sensor fixed inside to monitor respiration. (b,b’) Variation in the relative current versus time during inhalation, exhalation and voluntary apnea. (c) Detection of the rate and strength of an adult breathing via the nose and mouth. (d) Signal variations for normal, fast and deep respiration. (e) The working mechanism of the Ag@Fe3O4-MS based sensor for detecting respiration.
Figure 7(a) Photograph showing the Ag@Fe3O4-MS fixed inside a common face mask. (b) Variation of the relative current through Ag@Fe3O4-MS in the breath before and after the volunteer drank water for a given time period afterwards. (c) Statistical results for the whole testing process of (b). (d) Tailoring and embroidery performances of Ag@Fe3O4-MS. (e,f) Performance in monitoring changes of humidity on the skin surface. Scale: 10 mm.