Literature DB >> 31580886

Establishment of optimal two-point discrimination test method and consideration of reproducibility.

Hirotake Yokota1, Naofumi Otsuru2, Rie Kikuchi3, Rinako Suzuki3, Sho Kojima2, Kei Saito2, Shota Miyaguchi2, Yasuto Inukai2, Hideaki Onishi2.   

Abstract

Two-point discrimination (TPD) has been widely used as a parameter for the examination of higher-order perceptual functions in the field of rehabilitation. Previous research has shown that the threshold of TPD increases with aging or pathological conditions such as stroke or chronic pain. It has also been reported that the threshold can be decreased by continuous tactile or electrical stimulation. The cognitive process in the cortex has been shown to be involved in the determination of the TPD threshold. However, the reliability of TPD has been questioned, because differences in the firing rate of the responding receptors and afferent fibers occur, depending on how the measuring instrument is applied. To investigate the influence of the stimulus condition on the TPD threshold, we utilized a computer-controlled two-point tactile stimulator and measured the TPD threshold by alternating stimulus speed and stimulus penetration depths. We found that a stimulus speed of 5.0 mm/s or 10.0 mm/s and a stimulus penetration depth of 1.0 mm were the optimum condition for measurement, at which the TPD threshold becomes lowest. We also found that no influence is exerted on the threshold by repeated measurement under the stimulus conditions utilized in this experiment. Our findings suggest that TPD measurement should be performed under certain stimulus conditions, as identified in this present study, to obtain reliable results that reflect the highest ability of the subject for spatial discrimination.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reliability; Stimulus penetration depth; Stimulus speed; Threshold; Two-point discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31580886     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  3 in total

1.  Modernising tactile acuity assessment; clinimetrics of semi-automated tests and effects of age, sex and anthropometry on performance.

Authors:  Nick A Olthof; Michel W Coppieters; G Lorimer Moseley; Michele Sterling; Dylan J Chippindall; Daniel S Harvie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Sensory Neurotization of the Ulnar Nerve, Surgical Techniques and Functional Outcomes: A Review.

Authors:  Mỹ-Vân Nguyễn; Jérôme Pierrart; Vincent Crenn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  The Repetitive Mechanical Tactile Stimulus Intervention Effects Depend on Input Methods.

Authors:  Hiraku Watanabe; Sho Kojima; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.