Amy Z Fan1, Sanchen Patricia Chou1, Haitao Zhang1, Jeesun Jung1, Bridget F Grant2. 1. From the, Epidemiology and Biometry Branch, (AZF, SPC, HZ, JJ), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 2. FedPoint Systems, LLC, (BFG), Fairfax, Virginia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about remission, recovery, and other outcomes of alcohol use disorder (AUD) as defined by the DSM-5. METHODS: Data from a large representative sample of the United States was used to examine correlates of past-year AUD status among individuals with prior-to-past-year AUD: persistent AUD, symptomatic high-risk drinking, asymptomatic high-risk drinking, symptomatic low-risk drinking, asymptomatic low-risk drinking (nonabstinent recovery, NAR), and abstainer (abstinent recovery, AR). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare: (i) AR and NAR with persistent AUD, (ii) AR with NAR, and (iii) asymptomatic and symptomatic high-risk drinking with AR and NAR. RESULTS: Among individuals with AUD prior to past year (n = 7,785), 34.2% were classified with persistent AUD, 8.8 and 1.6% were symptomatic high-risk and symptomatic low-risk drinkers, respectively, 21.5% were asymptomatic high-risk drinkers, 17.9% were asymptomatic low-risk drinkers, and 16.0% were abstainers. One-quarter of individuals with AUD prior to past year achieved AR or NAR without the benefit of treatment, while a much greater percentage of individuals achieving AR (43.2%) reported receiving treatment relative to those with NAR (12.3%). The number of lifetime AUD symptoms was greater among those achieving AR (among the treated) and lower among those achieving NAR relative to persistent AUD. The number of AUD symptoms was also greater among those achieving AR than NAR and lower among asymptomatic and symptomatic risk drinkers relative to those achieving AR and NAR. Consumption was greater among those achieving AR relative to those achieving NAR and greater among asymptomatic and symptomatic risk drinkers relative to AR and NAR. Odds of achieving AR or NAR relative to persistent AUD were generally lower among non-Hispanic Blacks and those with higher education, greater among women and married individuals, and lower among illicit drug users and individuals with histories of a personality disorder or mood/anxiety disorder. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a substantial level of recovery from AUD. Information on specific factors associated with AUD outcomes can be useful in targeting appropriate treatment efforts.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about remission, recovery, and other outcomes of alcohol use disorder (AUD) as defined by the DSM-5. METHODS: Data from a large representative sample of the United States was used to examine correlates of past-year AUD status among individuals with prior-to-past-year AUD: persistent AUD, symptomatic high-risk drinking, asymptomatic high-risk drinking, symptomatic low-risk drinking, asymptomatic low-risk drinking (nonabstinent recovery, NAR), and abstainer (abstinent recovery, AR). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare: (i) AR and NAR with persistent AUD, (ii) AR with NAR, and (iii) asymptomatic and symptomatic high-risk drinking with AR and NAR. RESULTS: Among individuals with AUD prior to past year (n = 7,785), 34.2% were classified with persistent AUD, 8.8 and 1.6% were symptomatic high-risk and symptomatic low-risk drinkers, respectively, 21.5% were asymptomatic high-risk drinkers, 17.9% were asymptomatic low-risk drinkers, and 16.0% were abstainers. One-quarter of individuals with AUD prior to past year achieved AR or NAR without the benefit of treatment, while a much greater percentage of individuals achieving AR (43.2%) reported receiving treatment relative to those with NAR (12.3%). The number of lifetime AUD symptoms was greater among those achieving AR (among the treated) and lower among those achieving NAR relative to persistent AUD. The number of AUD symptoms was also greater among those achieving AR than NAR and lower among asymptomatic and symptomatic risk drinkers relative to those achieving AR and NAR. Consumption was greater among those achieving AR relative to those achieving NAR and greater among asymptomatic and symptomatic risk drinkers relative to AR and NAR. Odds of achieving AR or NAR relative to persistent AUD were generally lower among non-Hispanic Blacks and those with higher education, greater among women and married individuals, and lower among illicit drug users and individuals with histories of a personality disorder or mood/anxiety disorder. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a substantial level of recovery from AUD. Information on specific factors associated with AUD outcomes can be useful in targeting appropriate treatment efforts.
Authors: Jalie A Tucker; JeeWon Cheong; Tyler G James; Soyeon Jung; Susan D Chandler Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Vanessa A Palzes; Andrea H Kline-Simon; Derek D Satre; Stacy Sterling; Constance Weisner; Felicia W Chi Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Vanessa A Palzes; Andrea H Kline-Simon; Derek D Satre; Stacy Sterling; Constance Weisner; Felicia W Chi Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 6.526