Literature DB >> 31580127

Dose-response research in digital health interventions: Concepts, considerations, and challenges.

Megan A McVay1, Gary G Bennett2, Dori Steinberg3, Corrine I Voils4.   

Abstract

To optimize digital health interventions, intervention creators must determine what intervention dose will produce the most substantial health behavior change-the dose-response relationship-while minimizing harms or burden. In this article we present important concepts, considerations, and challenges in studying dose-response relationships in digital health interventions. We propose that interventions make three types of prescriptions: (1) intervention action prescriptions, prescriptions to receive content from the intervention, such as to read text or listen to audio; (2) participant action prescriptions, prescriptions to produce and provide content to the intervention, such as to send text messages or post intervention-requested photos on social media; and (3) behavioral target action prescriptions, prescriptions to engage in behaviors outside the intervention, such as changing food intake or meditating. Each type of prescription has both an intended dose (i.e., what the intervention actually prescribes) and an enacted dose (i.e., what portion of the intended dose is actually completed by the participant). Dose parameters of duration, frequency, and amount can be applied to each prescription type. We consider adaptive interventions and interventions with ad libitum prescriptions as examples of tailored doses. Researchers can experimentally manipulate the intended dose to determine the dose-response relationship. The enacted dose cannot be directly manipulated; however, we consider the applicability of "controlled concentration" research design to the study of enacted dose. We consider challenges in dose-response research in digital health interventions, including characterizing amount with self-paced activities and combining doses across modality. The presented concepts and considerations may help contribute to the optimization of digital health interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31580127      PMCID: PMC6861635          DOI: 10.1037/hea0000805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  19 in total

Review 1.  Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide.

Authors:  Ruth P Saunders; Martin H Evans; Praphul Joshi
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2005-04

Review 2.  Nurse dose: what's in a concept?

Authors:  Milisa Manojlovich; Souraya Sidani
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 3.  Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions.

Authors:  Predrag Klasnja; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Efficacy of Contextually Tailored Suggestions for Physical Activity: A Micro-randomized Optimization Trial of HeartSteps.

Authors:  Predrag Klasnja; Shawna Smith; Nicholas J Seewald; Andy Lee; Kelly Hall; Brook Luers; Eric B Hekler; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-05-03

5.  SMS reminders improve adherence to oral medication in type 2 diabetes patients who are real time electronically monitored.

Authors:  M Vervloet; L van Dijk; J Santen-Reestman; B van Vlijmen; P van Wingerden; M L Bouvy; D H de Bakker
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 6.  Informing the dosing of interventions in randomized trials.

Authors:  Corrine I Voils; Yunkyung Chang; Jamie Crandell; Jennifer Leeman; Margarete Sandelowski; Matthew L Maciejewski
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Behavioral couples therapy (BCT) for alcohol and drug use disorders: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark B Powers; Ellen Vedel; Paul M G Emmelkamp
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-02-16

8.  Effectiveness of an App and Provider Counseling for Obesity Treatment in Primary Care.

Authors:  Gary G Bennett; Dori Steinberg; Sandy Askew; Erica Levine; Perry Foley; Bryan C Batch; Laura P Svetkey; Hayden B Bosworth; Elaine M Puleo; Ashley Brewer; Abigail DeVries; Heather Miranda
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Randomised controlled trial evaluation of Tweet2Quit: a social network quit-smoking intervention.

Authors:  Cornelia Pechmann; Kevin Delucchi; Cynthia M Lakon; Judith J Prochaska
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Olga Perski; Ann Blandford; Robert West; Susan Michie
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  12 in total

1.  A Randomization Permutation Test for Single Subject Mediation.

Authors:  David P MacKinnon; Heather L Smyth; Jennifer Somers; Emily Ho; Julia Norget; Milica Miočević
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Person-specific dose-finding for a digital messaging intervention to promote physical activity.

Authors:  Sarah Hojjatinia; Sahar Hojjatinia; Constantino M Lagoa; Deborah Brunke-Reese; David E Conroy
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.556

3.  Examining Adherence and Dose Effect of an Early Palliative Care Intervention for Advanced Heart Failure Patients.

Authors:  Rachel Wells; James Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Andres Azuero; Harleah Buck; Deborah Ejem; Kathryn L Burgio; Macy L Stockdill; Rodney Tucker; Salpy V Pamboukian; Jose Tallaj; Sally Engler; Konda Keebler; Sheri Tims; Raegan Durant; Keith M Swetz; Marie Bakitas
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.576

4.  Temporal Dynamics of Treatment Receipt in a Text Message Intervention for Physical Activity: Single-Group, Within-Person Trial.

Authors:  David E Conroy; Chih-Hsiang Yang; Stephanie T Lanza; Joshua M Smyth; Constantino M Lagoa
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 5.  The effectiveness of Internet-delivered treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nora Eilert; Angel Enrique; Rebecca Wogan; Olwyn Mooney; Ladislav Timulak; Derek Richards
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 6.505

6.  Use and Appreciation of a Web-Based, Computer-Tailored Diet and Physical Activity Intervention Based on the Self-determination Theory: Evaluation Study of Process and Predictors.

Authors:  Juul M J Coumans; Anke Oenema; Catherine A W Bolman; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-12-02

7.  Text Messaging Intervention for Mental Wellness in American Indian and Alaska Native Teens and Young Adults (BRAVE Study): Analysis of User Engagement Patterns.

Authors:  Julia Wrobel; Joshva Silvasstar; Roger Peterson; Kanku Sumbundu; Allyson Kelley; David Stephens; Stephanie Craig Rushing; Sheana Bull
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-02-25

8.  MCMTC: A Pragmatic Framework for Selecting an Experimental Design to Inform the Development of Digital Interventions.

Authors:  Inbal Nahum-Shani; John J Dziak; David W Wetter
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-03-09

9.  Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Deborah F Tate; Lesley D Lutes; Maria Bryant; Kimberly P Truesdale; Karen E Hatley; Zoe Griffiths; Tricia S Tang; Louise D Padgett; Angela M Pinto; June Stevens; Gary D Foster
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

Review 10.  The Measurement of Dose and Response for Smoking Behavior Change Interventions in the Digital Age: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Megumi Ichimiya; Raquel Gerard; Sarah Mills; Alexa Brodsky; Jennifer Cantrell; W Douglas Evans
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 7.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.