Literature DB >> 31580055

Five Piconewtons: The Difference between Osteogenic and Adipogenic Fate Choice in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Pingping Han1,2, Jessica E Frith1,3, Guillermo A Gomez4,5, Alpha S Yap4, Geraldine M O'Neill6,7, Justin J Cooper-White1,2,8,9.   

Abstract

The ability of mesenchymal stem cells to sense nanoscale variations in extracellular matrix (ECM) compositions in their local microenvironment is crucial to their survival and their fate; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms defining how such fates are temporally modulated remain poorly understood. In this work, we have utilized self-assembled block copolymer surfaces to present nanodomains of an adhesive peptide found in many ECM proteins at different lateral spacings (from 30 to 60 nm) and studied the temporal response (2 h to 14 days) of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) using a panel of real-time localization and activity biosensors. Our findings revealed that within the first 4 to 24 h postadhesion and spreading, hMSCs on smaller nanodomain spacings recruit more activated FAK and Src proteins to produce larger, longer-lived, and increased numbers of focal adhesions (FAs). The adhesions formed on smaller nanospacings rapidly recruit higher amounts of nonmuscle myosin IIA and vinculin and experience tension forces (by >5 pN/FA) significantly higher than those observed on larger nanodomain spacings. The transmission of higher levels of tension into the cytoskeleton at short times was accompanied by higher Rac1, cytosolic β-catenin, and nuclear localization of YAP/TAZ and RUNX2, which together biased the commitment of hMSCs to an osteogenic fate. This investigation provides mechanistic insights to confirm that smaller lateral spacings of adhesive nanodomains alter hMSC mechanosensing and biases mechanotransduction at short times via differential coupling of FAK/Src/Rac1/myosin IIA/YAP/TAZ signaling pathways to support longer-term changes in stem cell differentiation and state.

Entities:  

Keywords:  focal adhesions; lateral ligand spacing; mechanosensing; mechanotransduction; stem cell fate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31580055     DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b03914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  13 in total

Review 1.  The Intersection of Mechanotransduction and Regenerative Osteogenic Materials.

Authors:  Anthony A Bertrand; Sri Harshini Malapati; Dean T Yamaguchi; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 2.  Integrins in the Regulation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation by Mechanical Signals.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Fuwen Zheng; Ruixue Song; Lequan Zhuang; Ming Yang; Jian Suo; Lisha Li
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Ligand functionalization of titanium nanopattern enables the analysis of cell-ligand interactions by super-resolution microscopy.

Authors:  Kashish Jain; Pakorn Kanchanawong; Michael P Sheetz; Xianjing Zhou; Haogang Cai; Rishita Changede
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 17.021

4.  The effect of matrix stiffness on the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Yimei Zhou; Jingyi Qiu; Lingyun Wan; Juan Li
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 5.  Regulation of stem cell fate and function by using bioactive materials with nanoarchitectonics for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Jiaming Shi; Wenyan Lv; Xiaofang Jia; Katsuhiko Ariga
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 7.821

6.  Synergistic Effect of Cell-Derived Extracellular Matrices and Topography on Osteogenesis of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Liangliang Yang; Lu Ge; Patrick van Rijn
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  Salivary Small Extracellular Vesicles Associated miRNAs in Periodontal Status-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pingping Han; Peter Mark Bartold; Carlos Salomon; Saso Ivanovski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  The YAP/TAZ Pathway in Osteogenesis and Bone Sarcoma Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Heinrich Kovar; Lisa Bierbaumer; Branka Radic-Sarikas
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  A Comparison of Osteoblast and Osteoclast In Vitro Co-Culture Models and Their Translation for Preclinical Drug Testing Applications.

Authors:  Alexander Sieberath; Elena Della Bella; Ana Marina Ferreira; Piergiorgio Gentile; David Eglin; Kenny Dalgarno
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour.

Authors:  Ovijit Chaudhuri; Justin Cooper-White; Paul A Janmey; David J Mooney; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.