Literature DB >> 31579915

Tissue stiffness at the human maternal-fetal interface.

Yassen Abbas1,2,3, Alejandro Carnicer-Lombarte4,5, Lucy Gardner2,3, Jake Thomas2, Jan J Brosens6, Ashley Moffett2,3, Andrew M Sharkey2,3, Kristian Franze3,4, Graham J Burton3,4, Michelle L Oyen1,3,7.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What is the stiffness (elastic modulus) of human nonpregnant secretory phase endometrium, first trimester decidua, and placenta? SUMMARY ANSWER: The stiffness of decidua basalis, the site of placental invasion, was an order of magnitude higher at 103 Pa compared to 102 Pa for decidua parietalis, nonpregnant endometrium and placenta. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Mechanical forces have profound effects on cell behavior, regulating both cell differentiation and migration. Despite their importance, very little is known about their effects on blastocyst implantation and trophoblast migration during placental development because of the lack of mechanical characterization at the human maternal-fetal interface. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: An observational study was conducted to measure the stiffness of ex vivo samples of human nonpregnant secretory endometrium (N = 5) and first trimester decidua basalis (N = 6), decidua parietalis (N = 5), and placenta (N = 5). The stiffness of the artificial extracellular matrix (ECM), Matrigel®, commonly used to study migration of extravillous trophoblast (EVT) in three dimensions and to culture endometrial and placental organoids, was also determined (N = 5). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Atomic force microscopy was used to perform ex vivo direct measurements to determine the stiffness of fresh tissue samples. Decidua was stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HLA-G+ EVT to confirm whether samples were decidua basalis or decidua parietalis. Endometrium was stained with hematoxylin and eosin to confirm the presence of luminal epithelium. Single-cell RNA sequencing data were analyzed to determine expression of ECM transcripts by decidual and placental cells. Fibrillin 1, a protein identified by these data, was stained by IHC in decidua basalis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We observed that decidua basalis was significantly stiffer than decidua parietalis, at 1250 and 171 Pa, respectively (P < 0.05). The stiffness of decidua parietalis was similar to nonpregnant endometrium and placental tissue (250 and 232 Pa, respectively). These findings suggest that it is the presence of invading EVT that is driving the increase in stiffness in decidua basalis. The stiffness of Matrigel® was found to be 331 Pa, significantly lower than decidua basalis (P < 0.05). LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Tissue stiffness was derived by ex vivo measurements on blocks of fresh tissue in the absence of blood flow. The nonpregnant endometrium samples were obtained from women undergoing treatment for infertility. These may not reflect the stiffness of endometrium from normal fertile women. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: These results provide direct measurements of tissue stiffness during the window of implantation and first trimester of human pregnancy. They serve as a basis of future studies exploring the impact of mechanics on embryo implantation and development of the placenta. The findings provide important baseline data to inform matrix stiffness requirements when developing in vitro models of trophoblast stem cell development and migration that more closely resemble the decidua in vivo. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the Centre for Trophoblast Research, the Wellcome Trust (090108/Z/09/Z, 085992/Z/08/Z), the Medical Research Council (MR/P001092/1), the European Research Council (772426), an Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Doctoral Training Award (1354760), a UK Medical Research Council and Sackler Foundation Doctoral Training Grant (RG70550) and a Wellcome Trust Doctoral Studentship (215226/Z/19/Z).
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blastocyst implantation; human; mechanics; tissue stiffness; trophoblast invasion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31579915      PMCID: PMC6809602          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  43 in total

1.  Mechanical difference between white and gray matter in the rat cerebellum measured by scanning force microscopy.

Authors:  Andreas F Christ; Kristian Franze; Helene Gautier; Pouria Moshayedi; James Fawcett; Robin J M Franklin; Ragnhildur T Karadottir; Jochen Guck
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Fibrillin microfibrils are stiff reinforcing fibres in compliant tissues.

Authors:  Michael J Sherratt; Clair Baldock; J Louise Haston; David F Holmes; Carolyn J P Jones; C Adrian Shuttleworth; Timothy J Wess; Cay M Kielty
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Fibrillar Collagens.

Authors:  Jordi Bella; David J S Hulmes
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2017

5.  Development of organoids from mouse and human endometrium showing endometrial epithelium physiology and long-term expandability.

Authors:  Matteo Boretto; Benoit Cox; Manuel Noben; Nikolai Hendriks; Amelie Fassbender; Heleen Roose; Frédéric Amant; Dirk Timmerman; Carla Tomassetti; Arne Vanhie; Christel Meuleman; Marc Ferrante; Hugo Vankelecom
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 6.  Cyclic decidualization of the human endometrium in reproductive health and failure.

Authors:  Birgit Gellersen; Jan J Brosens
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 7.  Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration.

Authors:  Kyle H Vining; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  The elastic modulus of Matrigel as determined by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Shauheen S Soofi; Julie A Last; Sara J Liliensiek; Paul F Nealey; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.867

9.  Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models.

Authors:  David C Lin; David I Shreiber; Emilios K Dimitriadis; Ferenc Horkay
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2008-11-02

10.  Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal-fetal interface in humans.

Authors:  Roser Vento-Tormo; Mirjana Efremova; Muzlifah Haniffa; Ashley Moffett; Sarah A Teichmann; Rachel A Botting; Margherita Y Turco; Miquel Vento-Tormo; Kerstin B Meyer; Jong-Eun Park; Emily Stephenson; Krzysztof Polański; Angela Goncalves; Lucy Gardner; Staffan Holmqvist; Johan Henriksson; Angela Zou; Andrew M Sharkey; Ben Millar; Barbara Innes; Laura Wood; Anna Wilbrey-Clark; Rebecca P Payne; Martin A Ivarsson; Steve Lisgo; Andrew Filby; David H Rowitch; Judith N Bulmer; Gavin J Wright; Michael J T Stubbington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  The role of extracellular matrix in normal and pathological pregnancy: Future applications of microphysiological systems in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Blakely B O'Connor; Benjamin D Pope; Michael M Peters; Carrie Ris-Stalpers; Kevin K Parker
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 2.  Investigation of human trophoblast invasion in vitro.

Authors:  Yassen Abbas; Margherita Y Turco; Graham J Burton; Ashley Moffett
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 3.  Biomaterials Regulate Mechanosensors YAP/TAZ in Stem Cell Growth and Differentiation.

Authors:  Jasmeet Kaur Virdi; Prasad Pethe
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.169

4.  Modelling the impact of decidual senescence on embryo implantation in human endometrial assembloids.

Authors:  Thomas M Rawlings; Komal Makwana; Deborah M Taylor; Matteo A Molè; Katherine J Fishwick; Maria Tryfonos; Joshua Odendaal; Amelia Hawkes; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz; Geraldine M Hartshorne; Jan J Brosens; Emma S Lucas
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Soft substrate maintains stemness and pluripotent stem cell-like phenotype of human embryonic stem cells under defined culture conditions.

Authors:  Jasmeet Kaur Virdi; Prasad Pethe
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.040

6.  A 3-dimensional microfluidic platform for modeling human extravillous trophoblast invasion and toxicological screening.

Authors:  Yong Pu; Jeremy Gingrich; Almudena Veiga-Lopez
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 7.  Bioengineering Approaches for Placental Research.

Authors:  Mackenzie L Wheeler; Michelle L Oyen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Tuning Trophoblast Motility in a Gelatin Hydrogel via Soluble Cues from the Maternal-Fetal Interface.

Authors:  Samantha G Zambuto; Kathryn B H Clancy; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.080

Review 9.  Collagen at the maternal-fetal interface in human pregnancy.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Shi; Zhen-Zhen Lai; Hui-Li Yang; Shao-Liang Yang; Cheng-Jie Wang; Deng Ao; Lu-Yu Ruan; Hui-Hui Shen; Wen-Jie Zhou; Jie Mei; Qiang Fu; Ming-Qing Li
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  Generation of a three-dimensional collagen scaffold-based model of the human endometrium.

Authors:  Yassen Abbas; Lucia G Brunel; Michael S Hollinshead; Ridma C Fernando; Lucy Gardner; Imogen Duncan; Ashley Moffett; Serena Best; Margherita Y Turco; Graham J Burton; Ruth E Cameron
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.