| Literature DB >> 31579690 |
Leila Khojastepour1, Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar1, Maryam Eisazadeh2, Mahboobeh Bahreini3.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Various pathologic conditions can affect the thickness of the roof of glenoid fossa (RGF). The relationship between the RGF thickness and temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is not explicitly investigated. Considering the changes in RGF thickness, as a radiographic sign for TMD diagnosis, the phenomenon may necessitate specific treatment and may influence the treatment course and results.Entities:
Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography ; Temporomandibular joint ; Temporomandibular joint disorder; Roof of glenoid fossa
Year: 2019 PMID: 31579690 PMCID: PMC6732180 DOI: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent (Shiraz) ISSN: 2345-6418
Figure1Measurement of RGF(R) in corrected frontal section, which demarcates the distance between inferior cortex and the superior one
Figure2a: Discontinuity of RGF in corrected frontal view, b: confirmed in corrected sagittal view
Age and gender distribution
| Variable | Group |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMD (n=70) | Non-TMD (n=70) | |||
| Age | 32.66±12.50 | 35.67±10.75 | 0.128 | |
| Gender | F | 55 (78.6) | 47 (67.1) | 0.128 |
| M | 15 (21.4) | 23 (32.9) | ||
Age was described using mean±SD and gender was described using frequency (%)
Comparison between RGF thickness in TMD and non-TMD patients
| RGF thickness [mean(mm)±SD] |
| |
|---|---|---|
| TMD patient (GF=140) | 1.91±1.47 | 0.00 |
| Non-TMD patient (GF=140) | 1.12±0.69 |
Data were analyzed by t-test, Significant differences: p Value <0.05
Comparison between RGF thickness in TMD and non-TMD patients according to gender
| RGF thickness (mean±SD) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||
| TMD (55 female, 15 male) | 2.52±2.21 | 1.75±1.18 | 0.01 |
| Non TMD | 1.23±1.01 | 1.07±0.47 | 0.34 |
(47 female, 23 male) Data were analyzed by t-test, Significant differences: p Value <0.05
Association between TMD and apparent discontinuity
| Apparent discontinuity | Group | OR (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMD (n=140) | Non TMD (n=140) | |||
| Yes | 12(8.6) | 2(1.4) | 6.47(1.45-29.40) | 0.006 |
| No | 128(91.4) | 138 (98.6) | ||
Data were analyzed by Chi-square and OR index, significant differences: p Value<0.05
The values in the table are frequency (and %)