| Literature DB >> 31579483 |
Susan Azizmohammadi1, Sima Azizmohammadi1.
Abstract
Hypnosis in obstetrics is available for more than one hundred years, but the development of inhalational anesthetic and chemotherapy agents and anesthesia drugs pending the 19th century induced the decrement of its application. However, experimental assessment of this type of intervention on labor and delivery in not high yet. For this reason, evaluation of hypnotic techniques in preparing childbirth should be carried out. One of the main unified mind-body healing practices, which has a great remedial potential in different applications of health care like labor and delivery. Assessment of effectiveness of this procedure in various administered trials is not easy, due to methodologic challenges, like normalizing trial conditions and picking up sufficient sizes of sample. Applying techniques of hypnosis for childbirth within hospital settings makes women to easily overcome barriers associated with institutional policies or caregiver resistance. Potential analgesic and anxiolytic clinical hypnosis effects for childbirth deserve more clinical trials. In this regard, nurses who manage women pending labor and delivery could easily enhance their skills and related understandings for contributing to techniques of hypnotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Childbirth; hypnobirthing; hypnosis; hypnotherapy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31579483 PMCID: PMC6767938 DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2019.8365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Transl Myol ISSN: 2037-7452
Hypnosis studies specifications for supervising management of delivery pain
| Major classification of the study | Related studies | Size of sample | Conditions of the treatments | Pain extents | Main findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison of hypnosis and standard medical care | Cyna et al.[ | 3326 | Hypnosis vs. Standard med care | Regional epidural analgesia | Epidural analgesia is more in standard medical care |
| VandeVusse et al.[ | 101 | Auto hypnosis Standard medical care | Regional epidural analgesia Painkiller | Analgesic medication in auto hypnosis is less The Apgar score of auto hypnosis is higher | |
| Jenkins and Pritchard,[ | 862 | Auto hypnosis vs. Standard medical care | Painkiller | Analgesic medications are less in auto-hypnosis. The stage one period in auto hypnosis is shorter than standard medical care | |
| Martin et al.[ | 60 | Preparation of hypnosis | Painkiller | Preparation of hypnosis had less birth complications | |
| Comparison of hypnosis with supportive psychotherapy counseling | Letts et al.[ | 495 | Auto hypnosis Supportive psychotherapic counseling Standard medical care | Painkiller | The application of epidurals within auto hypnosis is less than supportive psychotherapic counseling and standard med care |
| Mehl-Madrona[ | 520 | Hypnosis vs psychotherapy or Standard medical care | Epidural drugs Painkiller | The application of painkiller and epidural drugs is less in hypnosis | |
| Comparison of hypnosis with psychoprophylactic method | Venn18 | 122 | Psychoprophylactic hypnosis vs medical care | Painkiller Pain self-ratings and nurse | There was no difference between psychoprophylaxis, hypnosis and medical care |
Principles of theoretical analysis
| Study | Cyna et al.[ | VandeVusse et al.[ | Jenkins, Pritchard[ | Martin et al.[ | Letts et al.[ | Mehl-Madrona[ | Venn[ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assignment accidentally | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Sample characteristics | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Medical treatment guidebook | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Remedial approaches based on hypnosis factors | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Hypnosis operational usage | No | Not clear | Not clear | No | Not clear | No | No |
| Mediation suggestibility of hypnosis | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |