Pseudomonas aeruginosa is capable of biofilm formation. In this study, we investigated the effects of aqueous Tradescantia pallida extract on Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth and biofilm formation. Aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts significantly inhibited both bacterial growth and biofilm formation. However, methanolic Tradescantia pallida extracts inhibited neither. Aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts were deactivated by heating but were not deactivated by light exposure. The ingredients retained the inhibitory effect on the bacterial growth and biofilm formation after ultrafiltration of aqueous Tradescantia pallida extract. Furthermore, polyphenol-rich Tradescantia pallida extracts inhibited bacterial growth, thus, polyphenols are possible to be an active ingredient. We observed the biofilm by scanning electron microscopy, and quantitative and qualitative differences in the biofilm and cells morphology. Interestingly, the biofilm treated aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts remained premature. We postulated that premature biofilm formation was due to the inhibition of swarming motility. Indeed, aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts inhibited swarming motility. These results demonstrate that Peudomonas aeruginosa growth and biofilm formation are inhibited by aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is capable of biofilm formation. In this study, we investigated the effects of aqueous Tradescantia pallida extract on Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth and biofilm formation. Aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts significantly inhibited both bacterial growth and biofilm formation. However, methanolic Tradescantia pallida extracts inhibited neither. Aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts were deactivated by heating but were not deactivated by light exposure. The ingredients retained the inhibitory effect on the bacterial growth and biofilm formation after ultrafiltration of aqueous Tradescantia pallida extract. Furthermore, polyphenol-rich Tradescantia pallida extracts inhibited bacterial growth, thus, polyphenols are possible to be an active ingredient. We observed the biofilm by scanning electron microscopy, and quantitative and qualitative differences in the biofilm and cells morphology. Interestingly, the biofilm treated aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts remained premature. We postulated that premature biofilm formation was due to the inhibition of swarming motility. Indeed, aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts inhibited swarming motility. These results demonstrate that Peudomonas aeruginosa growth and biofilm formation are inhibited by aqueous Tradescantia pallida extracts.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a gram-negative, aerobic bacterium that is ubiquitous in the environment. It can switch between growth as planktonic cells and as a biofilm.[1] Biofilms can be simply and broadly defined as communities of microorganisms that are attached to a surface.[2] Numerous bacterial species form biofilms, and research regarding biofilms has shown them to be complex and diverse.[3]Biofilms are formed from individual planktonic cells in a highly regulated developmental process. Planktonic cells are considered to initiate interactions with a surface in response to various signals, including the nutritional status of the environment.[4] Bacteria are able to undergo different types of motility that vary depending on the bacterium. Numerous planktonic organisms are able to initially colonize a surface by utilizing a flagellum to swim toward the surface and bacterial adhesins, such as type-IV pili and flagella, to attach to the surface.[5] Once the bacteria are attached, combinations of specific surface-associated motilities, replication (clonal growth), and/or recruitment of additional planktonic bacteria lead to the formation of bacterial aggregates called microcolonies, which can subsequently lead to mature biofilm development.[5]Proanthocyanidins, a type of tannins derived from cranberries, have been reported to interfere with bacterial adhesions.[6]Tradescantia pallida (Tp) has already reported its antibacterial activities against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.[7] Thus, we screened several plant extracts containing polyphenols for anti-biofilm activity. Among the extracts, aqueous extracts of Tp leaves showed significant anti-biofilm and non-significant growth inhibition activities (data not shown). This study aimed to investigate the inhibitory effect of Tp extract on the growth and biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strain and growth conditions
The bacterial strain used in this study was P. aeruginosa PAO1 (ATCC15692; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). This strain was cultured in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI-B; Eiken chemical, Tokyo, Japan) at 37°C for 18–22 hours.
Preparation of aqueous Tp extracts
Sliced Tp leaves (1 g) were used for extraction using distilled water (12.5 mL) at 37°C with shaking for three days. The solvent was exchanged every 24 hours. The total mixture was then filtered through membrane filters (Acrodisc 32 mm Syringe Filter with 0.45 μm Supor membrane; PALL Life Sciences, Port Washington, NY, USA).
Preparation of methanolic Tp extracts
Sliced Tp leaves (1 g) were used for extraction using 100% methanol (10 mL; Kanto chemical, Tokyo, Japan) at 37°C with shaking for three days. The solvent was exchanged every 24 hours.
Preparation of polyphenol-rich Tp extracts
The polyphenol-rich fraction was extracted from Tp following a protocol published by Konaté et al,[8] with some modifications. Sliced Tp leaves (1 g) were extracted using aqueous acetone (80%, v/v; 10 mL; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) at 37°C with shaking for 24 hours. The acetone was then evaporated, and the remaining residue was dissolved with distilled water.
Heat exposure assay
2.7% aqueous Tp extracts were heated in constant-temperature water bath at either 60 °C or 80°C, with shaking for six hours.
Light exposure assay
2.7% aqueous Tp extracts were exposured to fluorescent light about 1000–1500 lux for three days.
Ultrafiltration assay
Aqueous Tp extracts was fractionated using an ultrafiltration membrane Amicon® Ultra (nominal molecular weight limit (NMWL) of 10 kDa, Merck Millipore Ltd., Germany) into two molecular weight ranges (< 10 kDa and > 10 kDa). The 2.7% aqueous Tp extracts were added to 12 mL to the filter device, and the device was spun at 5000 × g for 30 minutes. The fraction > 10 kDa was collected in the filter device, and the fraction < 10 kDa was collected in the centrifuge tube.
Bacterial growth assay
The effect of Tp extracts on the growth of P. aeruginosa PAO1 in a liquid culture was measured using a protocol based on the protocol published by Matsunaga et al.[9] Growth assays were performed using BHI-B. Aliquots of Tp extracts were inoculated into the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate (polystyrene; AS ONE, Osaka, Japan). Subsequently, an aliquot from a bacterial broth culture (BHI-B, 37°C, 18–22 hours) was inoculated into each well. The plates were covered and incubated at 37°C for 18–22 hours. Bacterial growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) using a spectrophotometer. The starting OD600 of the liquid culture for the bacterial growth assay was 0.05.
Biofilm formation assay
Biofilm formation was assayed by the ability of cells to adhere to the wells of a 96-well microtiter polystyrene dish, using a modified version of a previously reported protocol by O’ Toole et al.[10] Briefly, bacteria grown overnight in BHI-B were suspended in fresh BHI, and then diluted to an OD600 = 0.05. Aliquots of the bacterial suspension (100 μL) were then inoculated into a 96-well polystyrene plate. After incubation for 18–22 hours at 37°C, the media and unattached bacterial cells were removed from the wells, and the plates were rinsed three times with phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4; PBS). Next, the wells were stained by adding crystal violet (0.1% w/v; 130 μL) for 20 minutes. The plates were then rinsed with distilled water, and the amount of attached material was quantified by solubilizing the crystal violet dye in 95% ethanol (150 μL). The optical density was measured at 595 nm (OD595) using a spectrophotometer.
Imaging of the samples using scanning electron microscope
PAO1 biofilms were visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JCM-6000 plus, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Bacteria grown overnight in BHI-B were suspended in fresh BHI, and then diluted to an OD600 = 0.05. Aliquots of the bacterial suspension (1000 μL) with 0.27% aqueous Tp extracts were then inoculated on sterile membrane filter (0.45µm; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) into a 24-well polystyrene plate (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) for four days. The medium was exchanged every 24 hours. Then, the membrane filters were rinsed two times with PBS, fixed by 15% neutral buffered formalin (pH 7.4), re-fixed by 1% osmium tetroxide (TAAB, Aldermaston, Berks, England), dehydrated and replaced with tert-butyl alcohol (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical). Tert-butyl alcohol was sublimed, and the membrane filters were coated of thin platinum layer using deposition apparatus (JFC-1600; JEOL).
Swarming motility assay
Swarming motility assays were performed 0.5% LB agar plate (LB Broth with agar (Miller); Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in a petri dish (polystyrene, 90 mm; AS ONE). The inoculum was placed on the center of the agar surface, which enabled visualization of motility across the agar surface.[5] The diameters of the swarming motility zones were measured after incubation at 37°C for 24 hours.
Statistics
The biofilm formation assays were performed in at least four plates and repeated at least three times. The results for each series of experiments were measured as a percentage of the control and are shown as means ± standard deviation. The significance of intergroup differences in the adherent cells was analyzed using student’s t test (unpaired t test).
RESULTS
The inhibitory effects of aqueous Tp extracts on bacterial growth and biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa
Aqueous Tp extracts significantly repressed bacterial growth at 0.27% and 0.135% (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1). Furthermore, 0.25% and 0.125% aqueous Tp extracts significantly inhibited biofilm formation and bacterial growth (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1). However, 0.25% and 0.125% methanolic Tp extracts did not inhibit bacterial growth or biofilm formation (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
The inhibitory effects of aqueous Tp extract on PAO1 liquid growth and biofilm formation
0.27% and 0.135% aqueous Tp extracts inhibited both bacterial growth and biofilm formation of PAO1. None of the methanolic Tp extract concentrations displayed any inhibition on bacterial growth or biofilm formation. **P < 0.01 versus control.
The inhibitory effects of aqueous Tp extract on PAO1 liquid growth and biofilm formation0.27% and 0.135% aqueous Tp extracts inhibited both bacterial growth and biofilm formation of PAO1. None of the methanolic Tp extract concentrations displayed any inhibition on bacterial growth or biofilm formation. **P < 0.01 versus control.
The effects of heating and light exposure on the ability of aqueous Tp extracts to inhibit the growth and biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa
The aqueous Tp extracts that were heated at 60°C and 80°C exhibited impaired inhibition of bacterial growth (P < 0.05) and biofilm formation (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2). However, the extracts exposed to light showed increased inhibitory effects of both bacterial growth (P < 0.05) and biofilm formation (P < 0.05) compared to the non-exposure extracts (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2
The effect of heat on the ability of the aqueous Tp extracts to inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formation
Heat-treatment (60°C or 80°C) significantly impaired the ability of the aqueous Tp extract to inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formation relative to the untreated control (P < 0.01). The unheated extract had a significantly different (P < 0.05) effect on both the bacterial growth and biofilm formation from the extracts heating at 60°C and 80°C. **P < 0.01 versus control. *P < 0.05 versus control.
Fig. 3
The effect of light exposure on the ability of the aqueous Tp extracts to inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formation
The light-exposed aqueous Tp extract inhibited both bacterial growth and biofilm formation. These effects were significantly different from treatment with the extract not exposed to light. **P < 0.01 versus control.
The effect of heat on the ability of the aqueous Tp extracts to inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formationHeat-treatment (60°C or 80°C) significantly impaired the ability of the aqueous Tp extract to inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formation relative to the untreated control (P < 0.01). The unheated extract had a significantly different (P < 0.05) effect on both the bacterial growth and biofilm formation from the extracts heating at 60°C and 80°C. **P < 0.01 versus control. *P < 0.05 versus control.The effect of light exposure on the ability of the aqueous Tp extracts to inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formationThe light-exposed aqueous Tp extract inhibited both bacterial growth and biofilm formation. These effects were significantly different from treatment with the extract not exposed to light. **P < 0.01 versus control.
The effect of ultrafiltration on the ability of aqueous Tp extracts to inhibit the growth and biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa
The fraction < 10 kDa facilitated bacterial growth (P < 0.01), but did not affect biofilm formation (Fig. 4). However, the fraction > 10 kDa did not significantly affect bacterial growth, but it did inhibit biofilm formation (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
The effect of ultrafiltration on the ability of the aqueous Tp extract to inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formation
The < 10 kDa fraction facilitated bacterial growth (P < 0.01) and did not affect biofilm formation. The fraction > 10 kDa did not affected bacterial growth, but it did inhibit biofilm formation (P < 0.05) compared to the control. **P < 0.01 versus control. *P < 0.05 versus control.
The effect of ultrafiltration on the ability of the aqueous Tp extract to inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formationThe < 10 kDa fraction facilitated bacterial growth (P < 0.01) and did not affect biofilm formation. The fraction > 10 kDa did not affected bacterial growth, but it did inhibit biofilm formation (P < 0.05) compared to the control. **P < 0.01 versus control. *P < 0.05 versus control.
The inhibitory effects of polyphenol-rich Tp extracts on the growth and biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa
The 0.2% polyphenol-rich Tp extracts facilitated bacterial growth (P < 0.01) and inhibited biofilm formation (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5). However, inhibition of biofilm formation by the polyphenol-rich Tp extracts was significantly decreased compared to the 0.27% aqueous Tp extracts (P < 0.01).
Fig. 5
The inhibitory effect of polyphenol-rich Tp extract on bacterial growth and biofilm formation
The 0.2% polyphenol-rich Tp extract facilitated bacterial growth (P < 0.01) and inhibited biofilm formation (P < 0.01). However, inhibition of biofilm formation by the polyphenol-rich Tp extract significantly decreased compared to the 0.27% aqueous Tp extract (P < 0.01). **P < 0.01 versus control. *P < 0.05 versus control.
The inhibitory effect of polyphenol-rich Tp extract on bacterial growth and biofilm formationThe 0.2% polyphenol-rich Tp extract facilitated bacterial growth (P < 0.01) and inhibited biofilm formation (P < 0.01). However, inhibition of biofilm formation by the polyphenol-rich Tp extract significantly decreased compared to the 0.27% aqueous Tp extract (P < 0.01). **P < 0.01 versus control. *P < 0.05 versus control.
The effect of aqueous Tp extracts on the biofilm morphology of P. aeruginosa
We observed quantitative and qualitative differences in the biofilm morphology as well as the extracellular polysaccharide (EPS)-like substances production (Fig. 6). A mature biofilm was noted in the control; however, only microcolonies were observed in the extract-treated biofilms. We also observed that EPS-like substances were bound to the cells and was also densely coated on the surface of cells in the control. However, production of the EPS-like substances appeared to be decreased in the extract-treated biofilm. No difference in the shape of the cells was observed between the control and extract-treated groups.
Fig. 6
SEM images of PAO1 biofilms with and without aqueous Tp extract
A mature biofilm formed in the absence of the aqueous Tp extract (a), whereas only microcolonies formed in the presence of the extract (b). Images are ×400 magnification. At a magnification of ×2000, the biofilm without Tp extract did not display a clear distinction of single cells (c). However, the microcolonies that formed in the presence of the Tp extract were clearly distinguished (d). At a magnification of ×7000, the EPS-like substance bound between the cells and the granular EPS-like substance coated the cell surfaces in the absence of the extract (e). The production of these substances decreased in the presence of the extract (f).
SEM images of PAO1 biofilms with and without aqueous Tp extractA mature biofilm formed in the absence of the aqueous Tp extract (a), whereas only microcolonies formed in the presence of the extract (b). Images are ×400 magnification. At a magnification of ×2000, the biofilm without Tp extract did not display a clear distinction of single cells (c). However, the microcolonies that formed in the presence of the Tp extract were clearly distinguished (d). At a magnification of ×7000, the EPS-like substance bound between the cells and the granular EPS-like substance coated the cell surfaces in the absence of the extract (e). The production of these substances decreased in the presence of the extract (f).
Inhibition of swarming motility by aqueous Tp extracts
We were interested in whether the aqueous Tp extract blocked swimming, swarming, and twitching motility involved in the biofilm formation of PAO1. Interestingly, the aqueous Tp extract did not block swimming or twitching (data not shown), but it did block swarming motility (Fig. 7). This finding suggests that aqueous extracts of Tp are able to inhibit biofilm formation via both the inhibition of bacterial growth and the inhibition of swarming motility.
Fig. 7
Inhibition of swarming motility by aqueous Tp extract
Values shown are the mean diameter of the swarming motility zone ± standard deviation, with triplicate plates per experiment. 0.27% aqueous Tp extract significantly inhibited swarming motility (P = 0.038) of PAO1 relative to the untreated control.
Inhibition of swarming motility by aqueous Tp extractValues shown are the mean diameter of the swarming motility zone ± standard deviation, with triplicate plates per experiment. 0.27% aqueous Tp extract significantly inhibited swarming motility (P = 0.038) of PAO1 relative to the untreated control.
DISCUSSION
A biofilm is a mass of bacteria that is capable of evading host defense mechanisms and resisting antibiotics. Yamanaka et al reported the capacity of polyphenols extracted from cranberries to inhibit the Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm formation.[11] Maisuria et al showed that the phenolic-rich maple extract efficiently reduced biofilm formation and repressed multiple-drug resistance genes as well as genes associated with mortality, adhesion, biofilm formation, and virulence.[12]We hypothesized that Tp extract specifically affects biofilm formation, and we tested our hypothesis on the P. aeruginosa strainPAO1. Aqueous Tp extracts significantly inhibited both bacterial growth and biofilm formation; however, methanolic Tp extracts inhibited neither (Fig. 1). These findings suggest the active ingredient is a hydrophilic substance or is decomposed or deactivated by methanol.The effects of aqueous Tp extracts on the growth inhibition and biofilm inhibition decreased upon heating, indicating that the active substance is hydrolyzed or has a high-order structure (e.g., protein) (Fig. 2). In addition, inhibitory activity increased upon light exposure (Fig. 3). The molecular weight of the active ingredient can be approximated by fractionating the extract into two molecular weight ranges with ultrafiltration. The faction > 10 kDa showed inhibition of biofilm formation, and the faction < 10 kDa did not show inhibition of biofilm formation (Fig. 4). This result indicates that the active compound is a high-molecular weight substance.Furthermore, we investigated whether the ingredient was a polyphenol. Polyphenol-rich Tp extracts showed inhibition of biofilm formation (Fig. 5), suggesting that the active ingredient is a polyphenol. However, the inhibition of biofilm formation by polyphenol-rich Tp extract was decreased compared with the 0.27% aqueous Tp extract (Fig. 5). We considered that this result indicated unknown substances besides polyphenols affecting bacterial growth and biofilm formation. Junio et al reported that three flavonoids from goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis), sideroxylin, 8-desmethyl-sideroxylin, and 6-desmethyl-sideroxyxylin, synergistically enhanced the antimicrobial activity of the alkaloid berberine, and these flavonoids were missed using traditional bioactivity directed fractionation.[13] Furthermore, Tan et al reported Tp has antibacterial activities against several gram-negative bacteria, Aeromonas hydrophila and Proteus vulgalis rather than several gram-positive bacteria.[14] Thus, we theorize that the effect of the aqueous Tp extract on bacterial growth and biofilm formation is a result of not only polyphenols, but also potentially multiple other substances that act additively, synergistically, or antagonistically together.In this study, we quantified biofilm formation and observed biofilm quality. When forming a biofilm, bacteria undergo a switch from reversible attachment to irreversible attachment. Next, adhesins and extracellular polysaccharides are produced, microcolonies are formed, and a biofilm matures as a mushroom-like structure. The large three-dimensional biofilm structure was observed in control cells, while cells treated with the aqueous Tp extracts did not form mature biofilms. Moreover, cell death was not obvious in cells treated with the aqueous Tp extracts, and the mechanism of inhibition of bacterial growth is not distinct. The EPS-like substances were remarkably decreased in Tp-treated cells, as observed by SEM. Moreover, the inhibition of bacterial growth does not necessarily correlate with the inhibition of biofilm formation. Thus, further research using a dynamic biofilm system is needed in order to determine the mechanism by which Tp extracts influence P. aeruginosa biofilm formation.P. aeruginosa can undergo flagellum-mediated swimming motility, in addition to surface-associated swarming and twitching motilities, which are predominantly mediated by hyperflagellation and type-IV, respectively.[4] Swarming has been noted to have an important impact on early biofilm formation.[15] It has been reported that swarming may be a highly organized form of motility involving multiple functions—the regulation of which is remarkably complex.[16] Swarming motility depends on flagella,[5] c-di-GMP levels,[17] and the production of rhamnolipids.[18] In the present study, aqueous Tp extracts not only limited bacterial surface colonization, but also served as an environmental signal for changing phenotypes. It is considered the signal transduction system regulating biofilm formation undergoes alterations and regulates gene expressions based on several environmental signals. Thus, the exact phase of biofilm formation that is affected by the aqueous extract of Tp remains unknown.In conclusion, the findings of this study demonstrated that aqueous Tp extract inhibits the liquid growth and biofilm formation of PAO1. This study provides new information on using antimicrobial substances and biofilm inhibitors against P. aeruginosa.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Dr. Daisuke Miyazawa (Kinjo Gakuin University, Japan) for detailed advice on analyzing protein and saccharides.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
All authors state that there are no conflicts of interests to declare.