Literature DB >> 31578888

Comparative-effectiveness of ceftaroline and daptomycin as first-line MRSA therapy for patients with sepsis admitted to hospitals in the United States Veterans Health Care System.

Marilyn L Mootz1, Rachel S Britt1,2, Allison A Mootz3, Grace C Lee1,2, Kelly R Reveles1,2, Kirk E Evoy1,2,4, Chengwen Teng1,2, Christopher R Frei1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared hospital readmission and mortality for patients with sepsis who received ceftaroline or daptomycin as first-line MRSA therapy.
Methods: This retrospective comparative-effectiveness study included adults ≥18 years old hospitalized in the United States Veterans Health Care System with sepsis between 10/1/2010-9/30/2014, who received ceftaroline or daptomycin within 14 days of hospital admission as the first antibiotic effective against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patients with pneumonia, and those who received both study drugs, were excluded. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi-square, Fischer's exact, Student's t, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Patient outcomes were compared with multivariable logistic regression models.
Results: 409 patients were included (ceftaroline = 67, daptomycin = 342). Ceftaroline patients were older, less likely to be Black, more likely to have diabetes with complications, and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores. Median (interquartile range) time from admission to drug initiation was 1 (0-1) day for ceftaroline and 1 (1-3) day for daptomycin (p = 0.01). Unadjusted hospital readmission rates for ceftaroline and daptomycin, respectively, were: 30-day (25%/37%, p = 0.06), 60-day (27%/44%, p = 0.008), and 90-day (28%/46%, p = 0.01). Unadjusted mortality rates were: in-hospital (7%/12%, p = 0.4), 30-day (3%/9%, p = 0.1), 60-day (6%/12%, p = 0.2), and 90-day (7%/15%, p = 0.1). In multivariable models with all divergent baseline characteristics included as covariates, patients treated with ceftaroline were less likely to experience (OR, 95% CI): 30/60/90-day hospital readmission (0.54, 0.29-0.98; 0.42, 0.23-0.76; 0.42, 0.23-0.75) and 30/60/90-day mortality (0.23, 0.04-0.82; 0.34, 0.10-0.93; 0.34, 0.11-0.86).
Conclusion: In patients with sepsis, ceftaroline was associated with fewer hospital readmissions and lower mortality as compared to daptomycin. Prospective investigations in larger, more generalized cohorts are needed to examine outcomes with specific MRSA therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative-effectiveness; MRSA; ceftaroline; daptomycin; sepsis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31578888      PMCID: PMC6883169          DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2019.1676540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)        ISSN: 2154-8331


  22 in total

1.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

Authors:  D C Angus; W T Linde-Zwirble; J Lidicker; G Clermont; J Carcillo; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and endocarditis treated with ceftaroline salvage therapy.

Authors:  Tony T Ho; Jose Cadena; Lindsey M Childs; Miguel Gonzalez-Velez; James S Lewis
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Is a Reported Penicillin Allergy Sufficient Grounds to Forgo the Multidimensional Antimicrobial Benefits of β-Lactam Antibiotics?

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Matthew Geriak; Victor Nizet
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  New concepts in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of bacteremia and sepsis.

Authors:  Reetta Huttunen; Janne Aittoniemi
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.072

5.  Inhibition of daptomycin by pulmonary surfactant: in vitro modeling and clinical impact.

Authors:  Jared A Silverman; Lawrence I Mortin; Andrew D G Vanpraagh; Tongchuan Li; Jeff Alder
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Large retrospective evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of ceftaroline fosamil therapy.

Authors:  Anthony M Casapao; Susan L Davis; Viktorija O Barr; Kenneth P Klinker; Debra A Goff; Katie E Barber; Keith S Kaye; Ryan P Mynatt; Leah M Molloy; Jason M Pogue; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Antimicrobial salvage therapy for persistent staphylococcal bacteremia using daptomycin plus ceftaroline.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Pamela A Moise; Anthony M Casapao; Poochit Nonejuie; Joshua Olson; Cheryl Y M Okumura; Michael J Rybak; Ravina Kullar; Abhay Dhand; Warren E Rose; Debra A Goff; Adam M Bressler; Yuman Lee; Joseph Pogliano; Scott Johns; Glenn W Kaatz; John R Ebright; Victor Nizet
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Utilization patterns and outcomes associated with central venous catheter in septic shock: a population-based study.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin Versus Daptomycin for MRSA Bacteremia With Vancomycin MIC >1 mg/L: A Multicenter Evaluation.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise; Darren L Culshaw; Annie Wong-Beringer; Joyce Bensman; Kenneth C Lamp; Winter J Smith; Karri Bauer; Debra A Goff; Robert Adamson; Kimberly Leuthner; Michael D Virata; James A McKinnell; Saira B Chaudhry; Romic Eskandarian; Thomas Lodise; Katherine Reyes; Marcus J Zervos
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Clinical Data on Daptomycin plus Ceftaroline versus Standard of Care Monotherapy in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Matthew Geriak; Fadi Haddad; Khulood Rizvi; Warren Rose; Ravina Kullar; Kerry LaPlante; Marie Yu; Logan Vasina; Krista Ouellette; Marcus Zervos; Victor Nizet; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications.

Authors:  Tommaso Lupia; Carlo Pallotto; Silvia Corcione; Lucio Boglione; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.