Faegheh S Mounessi1, Jörg Eckardt2, Arne Holstein3, Santiago Ewig4, Stefan Könemann2. 1. Strahlentherapie Zentrum Bochum, Bochum, Germany. fmounessi@gmail.com. 2. Strahlentherapie Zentrum Bochum, Bochum, Germany. 3. Radiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Gladbeck, Gladbeck, Germany. 4. Thoraxzentrum Ruhrgebiet, Kliniken für Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Herne und Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This simulation study assessed the feasibility and impact of incorporating additional information from lung perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) into intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this simulation study, data of 13 patients with stage I-III NSCLC previously treated by radio(chemo)therapy were used. The SPECT was fused together with radiotherapy planning CT. Functional lung regions (FL) and non-functional lung regions (nFL) were defined based on SPECT images. Four treatment plans were created for each patient: an IMRT and a VMAT plan with planning CT (anatomical plans), and an IMRT and a VMATplan which integrate the additional information from lung perfusion scintigraphy (function plans). Dosimetric parameters were compared between all plans for PTV parameters and normal tissue preservation, focusing on optimizing the lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy). RESULTS: Compared to anatomical plans, functional IMRT and functional VMAT plans reduced functional lung V20Gy in all cases of local and diffuse hypoperfusion patterns of SPECT defects. Similar results were observed for functional lung V30Gy and median dose to functional lung Dmean, but were not statistically significant in any group. A significant increase in non-functional lung V20Gy resulted in both functional plans. There were no significant differences in conformity or heterogeneity indices or PTV median doses between either pair of anatomical and functional plans. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of functional imaging for radiotherapy planning in non-small cell lung cancer is feasible and appears to be beneficial in preserving a functional lung in non-small cell lung cancer.
BACKGROUND: This simulation study assessed the feasibility and impact of incorporating additional information from lung perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) into intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this simulation study, data of 13 patients with stage I-III NSCLC previously treated by radio(chemo)therapy were used. The SPECT was fused together with radiotherapy planning CT. Functional lung regions (FL) and non-functional lung regions (nFL) were defined based on SPECT images. Four treatment plans were created for each patient: an IMRT and a VMAT plan with planning CT (anatomical plans), and an IMRT and a VMATplan which integrate the additional information from lung perfusion scintigraphy (function plans). Dosimetric parameters were compared between all plans for PTV parameters and normal tissue preservation, focusing on optimizing the lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy). RESULTS: Compared to anatomical plans, functional IMRT and functional VMAT plans reduced functional lung V20Gy in all cases of local and diffuse hypoperfusion patterns of SPECT defects. Similar results were observed for functional lung V30Gy and median dose to functional lung Dmean, but were not statistically significant in any group. A significant increase in non-functional lung V20Gy resulted in both functional plans. There were no significant differences in conformity or heterogeneity indices or PTV median doses between either pair of anatomical and functional plans. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of functional imaging for radiotherapy planning in non-small cell lung cancer is feasible and appears to be beneficial in preserving a functional lung in non-small cell lung cancer.
Authors: M L Hernando; L B Marks; G C Bentel; S M Zhou; D Hollis; S K Das; M Fan; M T Munley; T D Shafman; M S Anscher; P A Lind Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Y Seppenwoolde; S H Muller; J C Theuws; P Baas; J S Belderbos; L J Boersma; J V Lebesque Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Søren M Bentzen; Louis S Constine; Joseph O Deasy; Avi Eisbruch; Andrew Jackson; Lawrence B Marks; Randall K Ten Haken; Ellen D Yorke Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David A Palma; Suresh Senan; Kayoko Tsujino; Robert B Barriger; Ramesh Rengan; Marta Moreno; Jeffrey D Bradley; Tae Hyun Kim; Sara Ramella; Lawrence B Marks; Luigi De Petris; Larry Stitt; George Rodrigues Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yvette Seppenwoolde; Martijn Engelsman; Katrien De Jaeger; Sara H Muller; Paul Baas; Daniel L McShan; Benedick A Fraass; Marc L Kessler; José S A Belderbos; Liesbeth J Boersma; Joos V Lebesque Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Martha M Matuszak; Charles Matrosic; David Jarema; Daniel L McShan; Matthew H Stenmark; Dawn Owen; Shruti Jolly; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-10-29