Literature DB >> 31578276

Withholding the Introduction of Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Impact on Outcomes in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Tumors: A Multicenter AGEO Study (the WAIT or ACT Study).

Lola-Jade Palmieri1, Laurent Mineur2, David Tougeron3, Benoît Rousseau4, Victoire Granger5, Jean-Marc Gornet6, Denis Smith7, Astrid Lievre8, Marie-Pierre Galais9, Solene Doat10, Simon Pernot11, Anne-Laure Bignon-Bretagne12, Jean-Philippe Metges13, Nabil Baba-Hamed14, Pierre Michel15, Stéphane Obled16, Carole Vitellius17, Olivier Bouche18, Léa Saban-Roche19, Bruno Buecher20, Gaëtan des Guetz21, Christophe Locher22, Isabelle Trouilloud23, Gaël Goujon24, Marie Dior25, Sylvain Manfredi26, Emilie Soularue27, Jean-Marc Phelip28, Julie Henriques29, Dewi Vernery29, Romain Coriat30.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with RAS wild-type (WT) nonresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may receive either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) combined with first-line, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Without the RAS status information, the oncologist can either start chemotherapy with bevacizumab or wait for the introduction of the anti-EGFR. Our objective was to compare both strategies in a routine practice setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-weighted study included patients with a RAS WT nonresectable mCRC, treated between 2013 and 2016 by a 5-FU-based chemotherapy, with either delayed anti-EGFR or immediate anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Primary criterion was overall survival (OS). Secondary criteria were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).
RESULTS: A total of 262 patients (129 in the anti-VEGF group and 133 in the anti-EGFR group) were included. Patients receiving an anti-VEGF were more often men (68% vs. 56%), with more metastatic sites (>2 sites: 15% vs. 9%). The median delay to obtain the RAS status was 19 days (interquartile range: 13-26). Median OS was not significantly different in the two groups (29 vs. 30.5 months, p = .299), even after weighting on the propensity score (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.08, p = .2024). The delayed introduction of anti-EGFR was associated with better median PFS (13.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = .0244), even after weighting on the propensity score (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.61-0.90, p = .0024). ORR was significantly higher in the anti-EGFR group (66.7% vs. 45.6%, p = .0007).
CONCLUSION: Delayed introduction of anti-EGFR had no deleterious effect on OS, PFS, and ORR, compared with doublet chemotherapy with anti-VEGF. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: For RAS/RAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, patients may receive 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In daily practice, the time to obtain the RAS status might be long enough to consider two options: to start the chemotherapy with bevacizumab, or to start without a targeted therapy and to add the anti-EGFR at reception of the RAS status. This study found no deleterious effect of the delayed introduction of an anti-EGFR on survival, compared with the introduction of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor from cycle 1. It is possible to wait one or two cycles to introduce the anti-EGFR while waiting for RAS status.
© 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

Keywords:  Anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor; Bevacizumab; Metastatic colorectal cancer; RAS status

Year:  2019        PMID: 31578276      PMCID: PMC7011620          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  22 in total

1.  Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alan P Venook; Donna Niedzwiecki; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Federico Innocenti; Briant Fruth; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Deborah Schrag; Claire Greene; Bert H O'Neil; James Norman Atkins; Scott Berry; Blase N Polite; Eileen M O'Reilly; Richard M Goldberg; Howard S Hochster; Richard L Schilsky; Monica M Bertagnolli; Anthony B El-Khoueiry; Peter Watson; Al B Benson; Daniel L Mulkerin; Robert J Mayer; Charles Blanke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Association of Prognostic Value of Primary Tumor Location in Stage III Colon Cancer With RAS and BRAF Mutational Status.

Authors:  Julien Taieb; Hampig Raphael Kourie; Jean-François Emile; Karine Le Malicot; Ralyath Balogoun; Josep Tabernero; Enrico Mini; Gunnar Folprecht; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Claire Mulot; Olivier Bouché; Thomas Aparicio; Pierre Michel; Josef Thaler; John Bridgewater; Eric Van Cutsem; Géraldine Perkins; Come Lepage; Ramon Salazar; Pierre Laurent-Puig
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  The relevance of primary tumour location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of first-line clinical trials.

Authors:  Julian Walter Holch; Ingrid Ricard; Sebastian Stintzing; Dominik Paul Modest; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Astrid Lièvre; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Delphine Le Corre; Valérie Boige; Bruno Landi; Jean-François Emile; Jean-François Côté; Gorana Tomasic; Christophe Penna; Michel Ducreux; Philippe Rougier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Pierre Laurent-Puig
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  RAS mutation testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in French clinical practice: A status report in 2014.

Authors:  Astrid Lièvre; Jean-Louis Merlin; Jean-Christophe Sabourin; Pascal Artru; Sabine Tong; Lucie Libert; François Audhuy; Corinne Gicquel; Laurence Moureau-Zabotto; Roch-Anicet Ossendza; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.088

7.  The KRAS mutation detection within the initial management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a status report in France in 2011.

Authors:  A Lièvre; P Artru; M Guiu; P Laurent-Puig; J L Merlin; J C Sabourin; J Viguier; A Bastie; A Seronde; M Ducreux
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Plasma ctDNA RAS mutation analysis for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  J Vidal; L Muinelo; A Dalmases; F Jones; D Edelstein; M Iglesias; M Orrillo; A Abalo; C Rodríguez; E Brozos; Y Vidal; S Candamio; F Vázquez; J Ruiz; M Guix; L Visa; V Sikri; J Albanell; B Bellosillo; R López; C Montagut
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.