Lola-Jade Palmieri1, Laurent Mineur2, David Tougeron3, Benoît Rousseau4, Victoire Granger5, Jean-Marc Gornet6, Denis Smith7, Astrid Lievre8, Marie-Pierre Galais9, Solene Doat10, Simon Pernot11, Anne-Laure Bignon-Bretagne12, Jean-Philippe Metges13, Nabil Baba-Hamed14, Pierre Michel15, Stéphane Obled16, Carole Vitellius17, Olivier Bouche18, Léa Saban-Roche19, Bruno Buecher20, Gaëtan des Guetz21, Christophe Locher22, Isabelle Trouilloud23, Gaël Goujon24, Marie Dior25, Sylvain Manfredi26, Emilie Soularue27, Jean-Marc Phelip28, Julie Henriques29, Dewi Vernery29, Romain Coriat30. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France. 2. Department of Oncology, Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France. 3. Department of Oncology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France. 4. Department of Oncology, Mondor Hospital, Paris, France. 5. Department of Gastroenterology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France. 6. Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France. 8. Department of Gastroenterology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France. 9. Department of Medical Oncology, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France. 10. Department of Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France. 11. Department of Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France. 12. Department of Gastroenterology, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France. 13. Department of Medical Oncology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France. 14. Department of Medical Oncology, Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France. 15. Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm 1245, IRON Group, Rouen, France. 16. Department of Medical Oncology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France. 17. Department of Gastroenterology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France. 18. Department of Digestive Oncology, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France. 19. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre de cancérologie de la Loire, Saint Etienne, France. 20. Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France. 21. Department of Medical Oncology, Delafontaine Hospital, Saint Denis, France. 22. Department of Gastroenterology, Meaux General Hospital, Meaux, France. 23. Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France. 24. Department of Gastroenterology, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France. 25. Department of Gastroenterology, Louis Mourier Hospital, Colombes, France. 26. Department of Gastroenterology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France. 27. Department of Gastroenterology, Kremlin Bicêtre Hospital, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. 28. Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Etienne University Hospital, Saint Etienne, France. 29. Methodology and Quality of Life Oncology Unit, INSERM UMR 1098, Besancon University Hospital, Besançon, France. 30. Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France romain.coriat@aphp.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with RAS wild-type (WT) nonresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may receive either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) combined with first-line, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Without the RAS status information, the oncologist can either start chemotherapy with bevacizumab or wait for the introduction of the anti-EGFR. Our objective was to compare both strategies in a routine practice setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-weighted study included patients with a RAS WT nonresectable mCRC, treated between 2013 and 2016 by a 5-FU-based chemotherapy, with either delayed anti-EGFR or immediate anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Primary criterion was overall survival (OS). Secondary criteria were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: A total of 262 patients (129 in the anti-VEGF group and 133 in the anti-EGFR group) were included. Patients receiving an anti-VEGF were more often men (68% vs. 56%), with more metastatic sites (>2 sites: 15% vs. 9%). The median delay to obtain the RAS status was 19 days (interquartile range: 13-26). Median OS was not significantly different in the two groups (29 vs. 30.5 months, p = .299), even after weighting on the propensity score (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.08, p = .2024). The delayed introduction of anti-EGFR was associated with better median PFS (13.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = .0244), even after weighting on the propensity score (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.61-0.90, p = .0024). ORR was significantly higher in the anti-EGFR group (66.7% vs. 45.6%, p = .0007). CONCLUSION: Delayed introduction of anti-EGFR had no deleterious effect on OS, PFS, and ORR, compared with doublet chemotherapy with anti-VEGF. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: For RAS/RAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, patients may receive 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In daily practice, the time to obtain the RAS status might be long enough to consider two options: to start the chemotherapy with bevacizumab, or to start without a targeted therapy and to add the anti-EGFR at reception of the RAS status. This study found no deleterious effect of the delayed introduction of an anti-EGFR on survival, compared with the introduction of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor from cycle 1. It is possible to wait one or two cycles to introduce the anti-EGFR while waiting for RAS status.
BACKGROUND: Patients with RAS wild-type (WT) nonresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may receive either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) combined with first-line, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Without the RAS status information, the oncologist can either start chemotherapy with bevacizumab or wait for the introduction of the anti-EGFR. Our objective was to compare both strategies in a routine practice setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-weighted study included patients with a RAS WT nonresectable mCRC, treated between 2013 and 2016 by a 5-FU-based chemotherapy, with either delayed anti-EGFR or immediate anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Primary criterion was overall survival (OS). Secondary criteria were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: A total of 262 patients (129 in the anti-VEGF group and 133 in the anti-EGFR group) were included. Patients receiving an anti-VEGF were more often men (68% vs. 56%), with more metastatic sites (>2 sites: 15% vs. 9%). The median delay to obtain the RAS status was 19 days (interquartile range: 13-26). Median OS was not significantly different in the two groups (29 vs. 30.5 months, p = .299), even after weighting on the propensity score (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.08, p = .2024). The delayed introduction of anti-EGFR was associated with better median PFS (13.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = .0244), even after weighting on the propensity score (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.61-0.90, p = .0024). ORR was significantly higher in the anti-EGFR group (66.7% vs. 45.6%, p = .0007). CONCLUSION: Delayed introduction of anti-EGFR had no deleterious effect on OS, PFS, and ORR, compared with doublet chemotherapy with anti-VEGF. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: For RAS/RAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, patients may receive 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In daily practice, the time to obtain the RAS status might be long enough to consider two options: to start the chemotherapy with bevacizumab, or to start without a targeted therapy and to add the anti-EGFR at reception of the RAS status. This study found no deleterious effect of the delayed introduction of an anti-EGFR on survival, compared with the introduction of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor from cycle 1. It is possible to wait one or two cycles to introduce the anti-EGFR while waiting for RAS status.
Authors: Alan P Venook; Donna Niedzwiecki; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Federico Innocenti; Briant Fruth; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Deborah Schrag; Claire Greene; Bert H O'Neil; James Norman Atkins; Scott Berry; Blase N Polite; Eileen M O'Reilly; Richard M Goldberg; Howard S Hochster; Richard L Schilsky; Monica M Bertagnolli; Anthony B El-Khoueiry; Peter Watson; Al B Benson; Daniel L Mulkerin; Robert J Mayer; Charles Blanke Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Julien Taieb; Hampig Raphael Kourie; Jean-François Emile; Karine Le Malicot; Ralyath Balogoun; Josep Tabernero; Enrico Mini; Gunnar Folprecht; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Claire Mulot; Olivier Bouché; Thomas Aparicio; Pierre Michel; Josef Thaler; John Bridgewater; Eric Van Cutsem; Géraldine Perkins; Come Lepage; Ramon Salazar; Pierre Laurent-Puig Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Julian Walter Holch; Ingrid Ricard; Sebastian Stintzing; Dominik Paul Modest; Volker Heinemann Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Astrid Lièvre; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Delphine Le Corre; Valérie Boige; Bruno Landi; Jean-François Emile; Jean-François Côté; Gorana Tomasic; Christophe Penna; Michel Ducreux; Philippe Rougier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Pierre Laurent-Puig Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: A Lièvre; P Artru; M Guiu; P Laurent-Puig; J L Merlin; J C Sabourin; J Viguier; A Bastie; A Seronde; M Ducreux Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: J Vidal; L Muinelo; A Dalmases; F Jones; D Edelstein; M Iglesias; M Orrillo; A Abalo; C Rodríguez; E Brozos; Y Vidal; S Candamio; F Vázquez; J Ruiz; M Guix; L Visa; V Sikri; J Albanell; B Bellosillo; R López; C Montagut Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 32.976