Literature DB >> 31578047

Visual Evidence: Increasing Usability of Systematic Reviews in Health Systems Guidelines Development.

Connor J Smith1, Rebecca M Jungbauer1, Annette M Totten1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Integration of evidence from systematic reviews is an essential step in the development of clinical guidelines. The current practice for reporting uses a static structure that does not allow for dynamic investigation. A need exists for an alternate reporting modality to facilitate dynamic visualization of results to match different end-users' queries.
OBJECTIVES: We developed a dynamic visualization of data from a systematic review using the commercial product Tableau and assessed its potential to permit customized inquiries.
METHODS: Data were selected and extracted from a previously completed systematic review. The resulting dataset was then used to develop an interactive, web-based report designed for use by a guidelines development committee.
RESULTS: A novel example of combining existing reporting standards for systematic review data and modern reporting tools was developed to investigate potential benefits of a dynamic report. Demonstrations of the report to clinicians sitting on previous and future guideline committees received positive feedback for its potential benefit in guidelines development. The report received a runner-up award during the design challenge at the 2018 Workshop on Visual Analytics in Health Care.
CONCLUSION: The use of interactive, accessible data may increase the use of systematic reviews and aid decision makers in developing evidence-based practice changes. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31578047      PMCID: PMC6774757          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  6 in total

1.  Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.

Authors:  Kitty S Chan; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  An iterative evaluation of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians: a focus group study.

Authors:  Laure Perrier; M Ryan Kealey; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Stacey Sheridan; Megan Lewis; Vanessa Boudewyns; Cathy L Melvin; Christine Kistler; Linda J Lux; Katherine Cullen; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2013-11

4.  Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews.

Authors:  Miranda W Langendam; Elie A Akl; Philipp Dahm; Paul Glasziou; Gordon Guyatt; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-23

5.  A usability study of two formats of a shortened systematic review for clinicians.

Authors:  Laure Perrier; M Ryan Kealey; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Christine Marquez; Alekhya Mascarenhas Johnson; Sabrina Jassemi; Jamie Park; Julia E Moore; Caroline Blaine; Gertrude Bourdon; Mark Chignell; Moriah E Ellen; Jacques Fortin; Ian D Graham; Anne Hayes; Jemila Hamid; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Michael Hillmer; Bev Holmes; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc; Linda Hubert; Brian Hutton; Monika Kastner; John N Lavis; Karen Michell; David Moher; Mathieu Ouimet; Laure Perrier; Andrea Proctor; Thomas Noseworthy; Victoria Schuckel; Sharlene Stayberg; Marcello Tonelli; Andrea C Tricco; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 7.327

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.