| Literature DB >> 31577944 |
Kathrin Renner1, Christina Bruss2, Annette Schnell2, Gudrun Koehl3, Holger M Becker4, Matthias Fante2, Ayse-Nur Menevse5, Nathalie Kauer2, Raquel Blazquez2, Lisa Hacker2, Sonja-Maria Decking2, Toszka Bohn6, Stephanie Faerber2, Katja Evert7, Lisa Aigle2, Sabine Amslinger8, Maria Landa8, Oscar Krijgsman9, Elisa A Rozeman9, Christina Brummer2, Peter J Siska2, Katrin Singer2, Stefanie Pektor10, Matthias Miederer10, Katrin Peter2, Eva Gottfried2, Wolfgang Herr2, Ibtisam Marchiq11, Jacques Pouyssegur12, William R Roush13, SuFey Ong14, Sarah Warren14, Tobias Pukrop2, Philipp Beckhove5, Sven A Lang15, Tobias Bopp16, Christian U Blank9, John L Cleveland17, Peter J Oefner18, Katja Dettmer18, Mark Selby19, Marina Kreutz20.
Abstract
Tumor-derived lactic acid inhibits T and natural killer (NK) cell function and, thereby, tumor immunosurveillance. Here, we report that melanoma patients with high expression of glycolysis-related genes show a worse progression free survival upon anti-PD1 treatment. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac lowers lactate secretion of tumor cells and improves anti-PD1-induced T cell killing in vitro. Surprisingly, diclofenac, but not other NSAIDs, turns out to be a potent inhibitor of the lactate transporters monocarboxylate transporter 1 and 4 and diminishes lactate efflux. Notably, T cell activation, viability, and effector functions are preserved under diclofenac treatment and in a low glucose environment in vitro. Diclofenac, but not aspirin, delays tumor growth and improves the efficacy of checkpoint therapy in vivo. Moreover, genetic suppression of glycolysis in tumor cells strongly improves checkpoint therapy. These findings support the rationale for targeting glycolysis in patients with high glycolytic tumors together with checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials.Entities:
Keywords: NK cells; T cells; acidification; checkpoint; diclofenac; glycolysis; interferon gamma; lactate; monocarboxylate transporters; tumor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31577944 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Rep Impact factor: 9.423