Amy E Pinkham1,2, Kerrianne E Morrison1, David L Penn3,4, Philip D Harvey5,6, Skylar Kelsven7, Kelsey Ludwig3, Noah J Sasson1. 1. School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas At Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 4. School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. 6. Research Service, Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA. 7. Department of Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) are separate neurodevelopmental disorders that are both characterized by difficulties in social cognition and social functioning. Due to methodological confounds, the degree of similarity in social cognitive impairments across these two disorders is currently unknown. This study therefore conducted a comprehensive comparison of social cognitive ability in ASD and SCZ to aid efforts to develop optimized treatment programs. METHODS: In total, 101 individuals with ASD, 92 individuals with SCZ or schizoaffective disorder, and 101 typically developing (TD) controls, all with measured intelligence in the normal range and a mean age of 25.47 years, completed a large battery of psychometrically validated social cognitive assessments spanning the domains of emotion recognition, social perception, mental state attribution, and attributional style. RESULTS: Both ASD and SCZ performed worse than TD controls, and very few differences were evident between the two clinical groups, with effect sizes (Cohen's d) ranging from 0.01 to 0.34. For those effects that did reach statistical significance, such as greater hostility in the SCZ group, controlling for symptom severity rendered them non-significant, suggesting that clinical distinctions may underlie these social cognitive differences. Additionally, the strength of the relationship between neurocognitive and social cognitive performance was of similar, moderate size for ASD and SCZ. CONCLUSIONS: Findings largely suggest comparable levels of social cognitive impairment in ASD and SCZ, which may support the use of existing social cognitive interventions across disorders. However, future work is needed to determine whether the mechanisms underlying these shared impairments are also similar or if these common behavioral profiles may emerge via different pathways.
BACKGROUND:Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) are separate neurodevelopmental disorders that are both characterized by difficulties in social cognition and social functioning. Due to methodological confounds, the degree of similarity in social cognitive impairments across these two disorders is currently unknown. This study therefore conducted a comprehensive comparison of social cognitive ability in ASD and SCZ to aid efforts to develop optimized treatment programs. METHODS: In total, 101 individuals with ASD, 92 individuals with SCZ or schizoaffective disorder, and 101 typically developing (TD) controls, all with measured intelligence in the normal range and a mean age of 25.47 years, completed a large battery of psychometrically validated social cognitive assessments spanning the domains of emotion recognition, social perception, mental state attribution, and attributional style. RESULTS: Both ASD and SCZ performed worse than TD controls, and very few differences were evident between the two clinical groups, with effect sizes (Cohen's d) ranging from 0.01 to 0.34. For those effects that did reach statistical significance, such as greater hostility in the SCZ group, controlling for symptom severity rendered them non-significant, suggesting that clinical distinctions may underlie these social cognitive differences. Additionally, the strength of the relationship between neurocognitive and social cognitive performance was of similar, moderate size for ASD and SCZ. CONCLUSIONS: Findings largely suggest comparable levels of social cognitive impairment in ASD and SCZ, which may support the use of existing social cognitive interventions across disorders. However, future work is needed to determine whether the mechanisms underlying these shared impairments are also similar or if these common behavioral profiles may emerge via different pathways.
Entities:
Keywords:
Attributions; emotion recognition; mentalizing; neurocognition; social perception; theory of mind
Authors: Daniela Ávila-González; Larry J Young; Francisco Camacho; Raúl G Paredes; Néstor F Díaz; Wendy Portillo Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Ahmad Abu-Akel; Ruth C M Philip; Stephen M Lawrie; Eve C Johnstone; Andrew C Stanfield Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Christopher J Hyatt; Bruce E Wexler; Brian Pittman; Alycia Nicholson; Godfrey D Pearlson; Silvia Corbera; Morris D Bell; Kevin Pelphrey; Vince D Calhoun; Michal Assaf Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Giacomo Deste; Antonio Vita; Gabriele Nibbio; David L Penn; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Roscoe O Brady; Adam Beermann; Madelaine Nye; Shaun M Eack; Raquelle Mesholam-Gately; Matcheri S Keshavan; Kathryn E Lewandowski Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Melody R Altschuler; Dominic A Trevisan; Julie M Wolf; Adam J Naples; Jennifer H Foss-Feig; Vinod H Srihari; James C McPartland Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2021-05
Authors: Jean-Paul Noel; Michelle D Failla; Jennifer M Quinde-Zlibut; Zachary J Williams; Madison Gerdes; John M Tracy; Alisa R Zoltowski; Jennifer H Foss-Feig; Heathman Nichols; Kristan Armstrong; Stephan H Heckers; Randolph R Blake; Mark T Wallace; Sohee Park; Carissa J Cascio Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 4.157