Literature DB >> 31576444

Enhanced value with implementation of an ERAS protocol for ventral hernia repair.

Chris Harryman1, Margaret A Plymale2, Evan Stearns1, Daniel L Davenport3, Wayne Chang4, J Scott Roth4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open ventral hernia repair (VHR) is associated with postoperative complications and hospital readmissions. A comprehensive Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol for VHR contributes to improved clinical outcomes including the rapid return of bowel function and reduced infections. The purpose of this study was to compare hospital costs for patients cared for prior to ERAS implementation with patients cared for with an ERAS protocol.
METHODS: With IRB approval, clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes data were obtained via retrospective review of consecutive VHR patients 2 years prior to and 14 months post ERAS implementation. Hospital cost data were obtained from the cost accounting system inclusive of index hospitalization. Clinical data and hospital costs were compared between groups.
RESULTS: Data for 178 patients (127 pre-ERAS, 51 post-ERAS) were analyzed. Preoperative and operative characteristics including gender, ASA class, comorbidities, and BMI were similar between groups. ERAS patients had faster return of bowel function (p = 0.001) and decreased incidence of superficial surgical site infection (p = 0.003). Hospital length of stay did not vary significantly pre and post ERAS implementation. Inpatient pharmacy costs were increased in ERAS group ($2673 vs. $1176 p < 0.001), but total hospital costs (14,692 vs. 15,151, p = 0.538) were similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of hernia care via ERAS protocol improves clinical outcomes without impacting total costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced recovery; Hospital costs; Pharmacy costs; Surgical site infection; Ventral hernia repair

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31576444     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07166-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  6 in total

Review 1.  Should enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways be preferred over standard practice for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Sartori; E Botteri; F Agresta; C Gerardi; N Vettoretto; A Arezzo; A Pisanu; S Di Saverio; G Campanelli; M Podda
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Physical activity recommendations pre and post abdominal wall reconstruction: a scoping review of the evidence.

Authors:  S T Adams; N H Bedwani; L H Massey; A Bhargava; C Byrne; K K Jensen; N J Smart; C J Walsh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 3.  Building a Center for Abdominal Core Health: The Importance of a Holistic Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  Austin P Seaman; Kathryn A Schlosser; Daniel Eiferman; Vimal Narula; Benjamin K Poulose; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Role of Indocyanine Green to Mitigate Wound Complications in Component Separation Technique for Ventral Hernia Repair-Our Early Experience.

Authors:  Jignesh Gandhi; Amay Banker; Sadashiv Chaudhari; Pravin Shinde
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Enhanced recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lise Lode; Erling Oma; Nadia A Henriksen; Kristian K Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with electroacupuncture for rapid recovery of patients after laparotomy for gastrointestinal surgery: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hao Li; Qian Wen; Lingyun Lu; Hangqi Hu; Ying He; Yaming Zhou; Xiaoting Wu; Ning Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.