Literature DB >> 31576192

Influences of sample homogenization time and standing time before extraction on the determination of incurred pesticide residue levels in grapes.

Shinobu Hikino1, Tomonari Yajima1, Michiko Sakasai1, Daisuke Kobayashi1, Kazuaki Iijima1, Kazutoshi Ohyama1.   

Abstract

To estimate the influence of sample processing with a blender, we conducted a homogeneity test using a bulk sample of pre-harvest grapes. Relative standard deviations (RSDs) were calculated from the concentrations of pesticides in the portions from the top, middle, and bottom of the homogenate with fine and rough particles. The results from adequate sample processing showed that the RSDs of the residue levels of all five pesticides in the fine-particle homogenate were lower than 10%. In contrast, the results under problematic conditions such as short blending times and long standing times after blending showed higher RSDs (>15%). The RSDs of nonpolar pesticides showed greater variabilities under the problematic conditions than those of polar pesticides. Separate analyses of the precipitate and supernatant phases suggested that the distribution bias of skin particles in the homogenate has a major effect on the concentration of nonpolar pesticides because of weighing errors in the extracted portions.
© 2019 Pesticide Science Society of Japan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blender; grape; homogeneity; pesticide residue; sample processing; variability

Year:  2019        PMID: 31576192      PMCID: PMC6753257          DOI: 10.1584/jpestics.D19-026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pestic Sci        ISSN: 1348-589X            Impact factor:   1.519


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the variability in the levels of pesticide residue observed in Japanese cabbage and grape units.

Authors:  Masahiro Fujita; Tomonari Yajima; Kazuaki Iijima; Kiyoshi Sato
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.279

2.  Effect of sampling size on the determination of accurate pesticide residue levels in Japanese agricultural commodities.

Authors:  Masahiro Fujita; Tomonari Yajima; Kazuaki Iijima; Kiyoshi Sato
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Contribution of Sample Processing to Variability and Accuracy of the Results of Pesticide Residue Analysis in Plant Commodities.

Authors:  Árpád Ambrus; Judit Buczkó; Kamirán Á Hamow; Viktor Juhász; Etelka Solymosné Majzik; Henriett Szemánné Dobrik; Róbert Szitás
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Variability of pesticide residues in crop units.

Authors:  Arpád Ambrus
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.845

5.  Studies to improve the extraction yields of incurred pesticide residues from crops using the QuEChERS method.

Authors:  Julia Hepperle; Daniela Dörk; Anja Barth; Bünjamin Taşdelen; Michelangelo Anastassiades
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.913

Review 6.  Sampling and sample processing in pesticide residue analysis.

Authors:  Steven J Lehotay; Jo Marie Cook
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 5.279

7.  Role of Sample Processing Strategies at the European Union National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) Concerning the Analysis of Pesticide Residues.

Authors:  Parvaneh Hajeb; Susan S Herrmann; Mette E Poulsen
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  Use of an Efficient Measurement Uncertainty Approach To Compare Room Temperature and Cryogenic Sample Processing in the Analysis of Chemical Contaminants in Foods.

Authors:  Lijun Han; Steven J Lehotay; Yelena Sapozhnikova
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 5.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.