| Literature DB >> 31575935 |
Camilla Ceccarani1,2, Claudio Foschi3, Carola Parolin4, Antonietta D'Antuono5, Valeria Gaspari5, Clarissa Consolandi1, Luca Laghi6, Tania Camboni1, Beatrice Vitali7, Marco Severgnini1, Antonella Marangoni3.
Abstract
We characterized the vaginal ecosystem during common infections of the female genital tract, as vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC, n = 18) and Chlamydia trachomatis infection (CT, n = 20), recruiting healthy (HC, n = 21) and bacterial vaginosis-affected (BV, n = 20) women as references of eubiosis and dysbiosis. The profiles of the vaginal microbiome and metabolome were studied in 79 reproductive-aged women, by means of next generation sequencing and proton based-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Lactobacillus genus was profoundly depleted in all the genital infections herein considered, and species-level analysis revealed that healthy vaginal microbiome was dominated by L. crispatus. In the shift from HC to CT, VVC, and BV, L. crispatus was progressively replaced by L. iners. CT infection and VVC, as well as BV condition, were mainly characterised by anaerobe genera, e.g. Gardnerella, Prevotella, Megasphaera, Roseburia and Atopobium. The changes in the bacterial communities occurring during the genital infections resulted in significant alterations in the vaginal metabolites composition, being the decrease of lactate a common marker of all the pathological conditions. In conclusion, according to the taxonomic and metabolomics analysis, we found that each of the four conditions is characterized by a peculiar vaginal microbiome/metabolome fingerprint.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31575935 PMCID: PMC6773718 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50410-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the women enrolled for the study, subdivided in healthy (HC), bacterial vaginosis (BV), C. trachomatis (CT), and vulvo-vaginal candidiasis (VVC) groups.
| HC (N = 21) | BV (N = 20) | CT (N = 20) | VVC (N = 18) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrolment criteria | No symptoms and negative for microbiological tests | Positive for 3/4 Amsel criteria and Nugent score > 3 | Vaginal detection of CT DNA by NAAT | Suggestive symptoms and detection of | — |
| Mean age ± SD (years) | 26.1 ± 6.3 | 29.3 ± 7.7 | 24.3 ± 3.4 | 27.8 ± 7.2 | 0.08 |
| Mean BMI ± SD (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 2.4 | 22.9 ± 2.4 | 23.6 ± 1.8 | 23.0 ± 2.0 | 0.38 |
|
| |||||
| Creamy gray discharge | 0/21 (0.0%) | 17/20 (85.0%) | 0/20 (0.0%) | 0/18 (0.0%) | <0.0001 |
| Mean vaginal pH value | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.4 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | <0.0001 |
| Positive Whiff testa | 5/21 (23.8%) | 10/20 (50.0%) | 4/20 (20.0%) | 3/18 (16.7%) | 0.07 |
| Clue cells present | 1/21 (4.7%) | 19/20 (95.0%) | 3/20 (15.0%) | 5/18 (27.8%) | <0.0001 |
|
| |||||
| 0–3 | 16/21 (76.2%) | 0/20 (0.0%) | 13/20 (65.0%) | 7/18 (38.9%) | <0.0001 |
| 4–6 | 5/21 (23.8%) | 8/20 (40.0%) | 7/20 (35.0%) | 11/18 (61.1%) | 0.11 |
| 7–10 | 0/21 (0.0%) | 12/20 (60.0%) | 0/20 (0.0%) | 0/18 (0.0%) | <0.001 |
aThe Whiff test is considered positive when, by adding a drop of 10% KOH to a microscopic slide containing the vaginal secretions, a characteristic ‘fishy’ odour is present.
Figure 1Structure of the vaginal microbiota. Microbial composition of vaginal swabs of healthy (HC), C. trachomatis (CT), vulvo-vaginal candidiasis (VVC) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) positive women was analysed. (a) Boxplots of Shannon index (α-diversity). (b) Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) plot based on unweighted Unifrac distance (β-diversity). Each point corresponds to a sample. For each experimental class, the SEM-based confidence ellipse around the centroid is depicted. The first two components of the variance are represented.
Figure 2Taxonomic composition of the vaginal microbiota. Stacked bar charts of taxonomy relative abundances at (a) phylum and (b) genus level for healthy (HC), C. trachomatis (CT), vulvo-vaginal candidiasis (VVC) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) positive subjects. Only phyla and genera present at relative abundances >1% in at least 20% (i.e.: ≥16 samples) are reported. Remaining taxa are grouped in the “Other” category.
Average relative abundances of main microbial groups (phylum, family, genus).
| Level | Group | Relative abundance | P-value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC (%) | CT (%) | VVC (%) | BV (%) | Overalla | CT | VVC | BV | |||
| Phylum | ↓ | Firmicutes | 92.41 | 89.78 | 79.22 | 60.61 | <0.001 | — | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| ↑ | Actinobacteria | 3.39 | 5.62 | 12.02 | 18.38 | <0.001 | — | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ | Bacteroidetes | 2.71 | 2.99 | 5.02 | 11.51 | <0.001 | — | 0.019 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ | Fusobacteria | 0.22 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 7.87 | 0.003 | — | — | <0.001 | |
| ↑ | Proteobacteria | 0.57 | 0.60 | 2.23 | 0.41 | 0.030 | — | 0.013 | — | |
| Family | ↓ |
| 79.19 | 67.50 | 56.75 | 18.83 | <0.001 | — | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| ↑ |
| 3.16 | 8.10 | 6.61 | 13.67 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.007 | |
| ↑ |
| 2.93 | 4.17 | 9.56 | 11.82 | <0.001 | 0.044 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| = |
| 5.22 | 6.59 | 6.29 | 6.21 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.74 | 3.72 | 2.42 | 10.91 | <0.001 | 0.031 | 0.004 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 1.16 | 1.60 | 3.76 | 9.15 | <0.001 | — | 0.002 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.32 | 1.30 | 2.29 | 5.96 | <0.001 | 0.031 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.20 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 7.77 | 0.002 | — | — | <0.001 | |
| = | Uncl. | 1.66 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.58 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 1.14 | 0.29 | 1.23 | 3.04 | <0.001 | — | 0.044 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.03 | 0.24 | 1.51 | 2.07 | <0.001 | 0.034 | — | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.19 | 0.69 | 0.36 | 2.17 | <0.001 | 0.009 | — | <0.001 | |
| = |
| 0.69 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.86 | — | — | — | — | |
| = |
| 0.42 | 0.50 | 1.05 | 0.55 | — | — | — | — | |
| = |
| 0.03 | 0.10 | 1.46 | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | |
| = |
| 0.38 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.83 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.82 | 0.28 | 0.012 | — | 0.013 | 0.005 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.53 | 0.010 | — | 0.029 | 0.006 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.64 | 0.011 | — | 0.017 | 0.002 | |
| Genus | ↓ |
| 79.16 | 67.45 | 56.69 | 18.80 | <0.001 | — | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| ↑ |
| 2.72 | 3.65 | 7.68 | 11.44 | <0.001 | — | 0.003 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 1.16 | 1.60 | 3.76 | 9.15 | <0.001 | — | 0.002 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.06 | 2.97 | 1.04 | 8.64 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.036 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 1.09 | 4.42 | 3.51 | 3.51 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.031 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.18 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 7.76 | <0.001 | 0.020 | — | <0.001 | |
| = |
| 0.03 | 0.54 | 0.31 | 7.48 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 1.49 | 2.31 | 2.14 | 2.09 | 0.027 | 0.003 | 0.041 | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.17 | 1.00 | 1.94 | 4.92 | <0.001 | 0.024 | 0.001 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ | 1.35 | 1.95 | 1.86 | 1.81 | 0.023 | 0.003 | 0.041 | — | ||
| = | Uncl. | 1.66 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.58 | — | — | — | — | |
| = | Uncl. | 1.08 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.03 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.03 | 0.24 | 1.50 | 2.06 | <0.001 | 0.021 | — | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.37 | 0.56 | 0.78 | 2.02 | <0.001 | 0.011 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.16 | 0.65 | 0.32 | 2.14 | <0.001 | 0.008 | — | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.69 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.86 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.35 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 0.74 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.004 | — | |
| = |
| 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.59 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.40 | 0.49 | 1.04 | 0.54 | 0.045 | 0.012 | 0.013 | — | |
| = |
| 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.58 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.56 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.20 | 0.46 | 1.28 | 0.33 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.005 | — | |
| ↑ | Uncl. | 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.029 | 0.006 | — | — | |
| = |
| 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 1.39 | <0.001 | — | — | <0.001 | |
| = |
| 0.35 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 1.09 | — | — | — | — | |
| = |
| 0.02 | 0.10 | 1.42 | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ | Uncl. | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.89 | <0.001 | 0.023 | 0.017 | <0.001 | |
| = |
| 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.32 | — | — | — | — | |
| = |
| 0.48 | 0.03 | 0.46 | 0.39 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.13 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.23 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | — | |
| = |
| 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.73 | — | — | — | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.41 | 0.09 | <0.001 | 0.001 | — | 0.005 | |
| Genus | ↑ |
| 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.08 | 0.63 | 0.018 | — | 0.024 | 0.009 |
| ↑ |
| 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.016 | — | 0.015 | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.08 | 0.038 | — | 0.019 | — | |
| ↑ |
| 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.27 | <0.001 | — | — | <0.001 | |
| ↑ |
| 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.49 | 0.013 | — | — | 0.002 | |
| ↑ |
| <0.01 | 0.06 | 0.57 | <0.01 | 0.002 | 0.041 | <0.001 | — | |
| ↑ | Uncl. | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.49 | <0.01 | 0.019 | — | — | 0.041 | |
| = | Uncl. Rs-045 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.04 | 0.43 | — | — | — | — | |
For each taxa, significant p-values of the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and of pairwise comparison (Dunn’s test) of women affected by Chlamydia trachomatis infection (CT), vulvo-vaginal candidiasis (VVC) or bacterial vaginosis (BV) versus healthy women (HC) are reported. Arrows indicate the direction of the variation with respect to HC: ↓, decreased; ↑, increased; =, unchanged.
aP-value of the Kruskal-wallis test for equal medians among groups.
bP-value of the Dunn’s post-hoc test test for equal medians between each pathological condition (i.e.: CT, VVC or BV) and HC.
Figure 3Species-level characterization of Lactobacillus genus. Sequences classified within Lactobacillus genus were characterized down to species level by classifying them against a custom reference database. Proportions are relative to the total amount of Lactobacillus genus in each group. Only the twelve most-abundant species are represented. Less abundant Lactobacillus species are grouped under “Other Lactobacillus”. Per-sample relative abundances were averaged in each experimental category: (a) healthy (HC), (b) C. trachomatis (CT), (c) vulvo-vaginal candidiasis (VVC) and (d) bacterial vaginosis (BV) positive women.
Figure 4Vaginal metabolome analysis. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) on Bray-Curtis distance showing the separation of the samples according to metabolite profile as obtained from 1H-NMR analysis of vaginal samples from healthy (HC), C. trachomatis (CT), vulvo-vaginal candidiasis (VVC) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) positive women. The first and second components of the total variance are shown.
Figure 5Metabolite concentration in vaginal samples. Bar plots showing metabolites concentrations per vaginal samples from healthy (HC), C. trachomatis (CT), vulvo-vaginal candidiasis (VVC) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) positive women. Each bar represents the median metabolite concentration (mmol/L) across replicates per experimental group. Error bars show inter-quartile range (i.e.: 75th–25th quantile). Metabolites are grouped according to biochemical type (panels a–f). Stars indicate significant differences vs HC group.
Figure 6Correlation between metabolome and microbiota. Heatmap showing the Spearman’s correlation coefficient between metabolites concentration and the relative abundances of the main bacterial genera. Only groups present at >1% of relative abundance in at least one sample were considered. Metabolite and microbial data were clustered using Pearson’s correlation metric and average linkage.