Zhao Peng1, Ying Hu2, Junli Zhang3, Jose C Huguet-Tapia3, Anna K Block4, Sunghun Park5, Suraj Sapkota6, Zhaohui Liu6, Sanzhen Liu2, Frank F White1. 1. Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; zpeng15@ufl.edu ffwhite@ufl.edu. 2. Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506. 3. Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. 4. Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, FL 32608. 5. Department of Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506. 6. Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108.
Abstract
Plants are vulnerable to disease through pathogen manipulation of phytohormone levels, which otherwise regulate development, abiotic, and biotic responses. Here, we show that the wheat pathogen Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa elevates expression of the host gene encoding 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (TaNCED-5BS), which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of the phytohormone abscisic acid and a component of a major abiotic stress-response pathway, to promote disease susceptibility. Gene induction is mediated by a type III transcription activator-like effector. The induction of TaNCED-5BS results in elevated abscisic acid levels, reduced host transpiration and water loss, enhanced spread of bacteria in infected leaves, and decreased expression of the central defense gene TaNPR1 The results represent an appropriation of host physiology by a bacterial virulence effector.
Plants are vulnerable to disease through pathogen manipulation of phytohormone levels, which otherwise regulate development, abiotic, and biotic responses. Here, we show that the wheat pathogen Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa elevates expression of the host gene encoding 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (TaNCED-5BS), which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of the phytohormone abscisic acid and a component of a major abiotic stress-response pathway, to promote disease susceptibility. Gene induction is mediated by a type III transcription activator-like effector. The induction of TaNCED-5BS results in elevated abscisic acid levels, reduced host transpiration and water loss, enhanced spread of bacteria in infected leaves, and decreased expression of the central defense gene TaNPR1 The results represent an appropriation of host physiology by a bacterial virulence effector.
Plant hormone signaling controls multiple facets of plant responses in development, as well as biotic and abiotic stress, and plants are, therefore, vulnerable to disease by pathogens that can alter phytohormone levels (1, 2). A variety of bacterial plant pathogens synthesize phytohormones during the infection process, including auxin, cytokinin, and gibberellins (3–6). Agrobacterium tumefaciens transfers genes for autonomous auxin and cytokinin production to the host genome (7, 8). Pseudomonas syringae produces the toxin coronatine, which mimics the phytophormone jasmonic acid (JA) (9). The type III effector AvrRpt2 has been shown to increase host auxin sensitivity through an unknown mechanism of reduction of the auxin response repressors, AXR2 and AXR3 (10). Type III effectors HopZ1 and HopX1 of P. syringae activate the JA pathway by bypassing JA itself and inactivating the jasmonate ZIM-domain (JAZ) proteins, which act as repressors of JA-responsive genes (1, 2, 11, 12). Oomycetes, fungi, and bacteria are known to reduce or enhance levels of the drought-responsive phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) (2, 13). Elevated ABA levels have been both correlated with susceptibility and resistance in filamentous pathogens and, indeed, some fungi synthesize ABA, which may represent a virulence factor (13, 14). In the case of bacteria, several type III virulence effectors are associated with enhanced ABA levels. AvrXccC of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris has been associated with elevated ABA levels in Arabidopsis infections (15). Two effectors of P. syringae DC3000, AvrPto and AvrPtoB, have been associated with ABA increases, while HopAM1 is associated with inducing hypersensitivity to ABA (16–18). How individual effectors alter ABA sensitivity or levels is unknown.Some members of the genus Xanthomonas deploy a distinct family of type III effectors known as transcription activator-like (TAL) effectors. TAL effectors bind host gene promoters in a sequence-specific manner and add plasticity to adaption of the bacteria to host plants by direct manipulation of host gene expression (19–21). Xanthomonas translucens causes disease on a wide variety of grass species, including the subspecies pathovar X. translucens pv. undulosa (Xtu), which is a pathogen of wheat. Xtu strains harbor 7 to 8 TAL effector genes (22, 23). Here, we examined the role of TAL effectors in Xtu and attempted to identify TAL effector associated susceptibility genes in wheat infections.
Results
Tal8 Is Associated with Enhanced Virulence in XT4699.
Xtu causes the disease known as bacterial leaf streak of wheat (Fig. 1) and virulence assays were conducted by injection of bacteria into young leaves with a needle-less syringe, which resulted in water-soaked streaked lesions from the inoculation site (Fig. 1). Assays were conducted on mutants for each of 8 TAL effector genes in Xtu strain XT4699 (strains used in this study are listed in ). Mutant M6, lacking the gene tal8 (hereafter tal8) and containing the empty cloning vector (ev), incited shorter lesions in comparison to the WT strain XT4699 in 2 cultivars, the winter wheat cultivar (cv) Jagger (Fig. 1 and ) and the spring wheat cv Chinese Spring (). The reintroduction of tal8 into M6 restored virulence in comparison to M6 (ev) on both cultivars (Fig. 1 and ). No differences in total leaf and surface bacterial populations were detected between WT, M6 (ev), and M6 (tal8) in either cultivar (). However, populations of M6 (ev) were reduced in the section of leaves distal from the inoculation site in comparison to WT and M6 (tal8), indicating that more bacteria were distributed farther up and down the leaf in the presence of tal8 (Fig. 1 ).
Fig. 1.
Tal8 is associated with enhanced virulence. (A, Left) Field bacterial leaf streak infection of wheat. (Right) Individual leaf symptoms of infected leaf. (B) Photograph of representative leaves inoculated with bacterial strains with and without tal8 at 7 d postinfection (DPI). XT4699, WT Xtu; M6(ev), tal8-deficient M6 strain harboring the empty vector pHM1; M6(tal8), M6 strain carrying tal8 in pHM1. (C) Average lesion length measurements of 10 leaves at 5 DPI. Strains are as indicated in B. Each bar signifies the range of mean ± SD. The lowercase letters show significantly different groups (P < 0.05) using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (Tukey’s HSD). (D) Schematic of bacterial leaf population measurements in sections at 7 DPI. Section 1 included the initial inoculation site and water-soaked tissue caused by M6(ev). Section 2 had an equal length to section 1. (E) Populations of bacteria in sections 1 and 2 as described in D. The lowercase letters indicate significantly different groups (P < 0.05) with Tukey’s HSD.
Tal8 is associated with enhanced virulence. (A, Left) Field bacterial leaf streak infection of wheat. (Right) Individual leaf symptoms of infected leaf. (B) Photograph of representative leaves inoculated with bacterial strains with and without tal8 at 7 d postinfection (DPI). XT4699, WT Xtu; M6(ev), tal8-deficient M6 strain harboring the empty vector pHM1; M6(tal8), M6 strain carrying tal8 in pHM1. (C) Average lesion length measurements of 10 leaves at 5 DPI. Strains are as indicated in B. Each bar signifies the range of mean ± SD. The lowercase letters show significantly different groups (P < 0.05) using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (Tukey’s HSD). (D) Schematic of bacterial leaf population measurements in sections at 7 DPI. Section 1 included the initial inoculation site and water-soaked tissue caused by M6(ev). Section 2 had an equal length to section 1. (E) Populations of bacteria in sections 1 and 2 as described in D. The lowercase letters indicate significantly different groups (P < 0.05) with Tukey’s HSD.
TaNCED and TaERF Are Candidate Host Susceptibility Genes for Tal8.
RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) expression profiles of infected leaf samples were compared for both Jagger and Chinese Spring wheat cultivars with either WT or mutant bacteria () (24). Candidate disease susceptibility genes corresponding to the effector Tal8XT4699 (hereafter Tal8) were selected according to relative fold-change in expression between WT and mutant treatments from the Jagger cultivar (). The candidate genes were then ranked by the effector binding element (EBE) prediction score (), and the proximity of the EBE to the ATG and the fold-change in Chinese Spring treatment were noted (Table1). The specific EBEs were predicted from the repeat variable di-amino acid residue (RVD) region of the Tal8 protein, treating the unusual RVDs, KG, Y*, and QD as functionally equivalent to NG, N*, and HD of the consensus RVDs (). Among the top ranked genes, 2 homeologous sets of genes were noted. Traes_5BS_B626C522B represents a gene for 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 3 (NCED) located on the short arm of chromosome 5 of the B genome of hexaploid wheat, and was designated TaNCED_5BS (Table 1). The promoter region of TaNCED_5BS is conserved among the B, A, and D genome copies of the gene, although polymorphisms are present at the EBE region (). Traes_1BL_F0C52C5DF on the long arm of chromosome 1B represents a member of the apetala-2/ethylene response factor (AP-2/ERF) family and was designated TaERF_1BL (Table 1). TaERF_1BL has homeologs on the A and D genomes, and the predicted EBEs are identical (). The D genome copy of TaNCED was also induced as well as TaERF homeologs on the A and D genomes (Table 1 and ). No evidence was obtained for enhanced expression of TaNCED_5AS, which may be due to the TT > GC transversions in the corresponding EBE regions (). The proposed EBE for Tal8 lies 26 bp upstream of the putative TATA box of TaNCED_5BS (Fig. 2). No TATA box was identifiable in TaERF_1 BL, and the EBE lies 171 bp upstream the ATG (Fig. 2 and ).
Table 1.
Candidate genes targeted by Tal8
Gene ID
Gene name
EBE score*
Base pairs from ATG
Log2FC in JA
Log2FC in CS
Gene description
1
Traes_5BS_B626C522B
TaNCED_5BS
8
217
7.31
6.73
9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 3
2
Traes_7AS_25F9FEF52
8.91
467
4.45
1.91
Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit α-2
3
Traes_1BL_F0C52C5DF
TaERF_1BL
9.02
171
6.50
7.01
AP2-like ethylene-responsive transcription factor
4
Traes_1AL_DEF14D73D
TaERF_1AL
9.02
NA
4.12
4.58
AP2-like ethylene-responsive transcription factor
5
Traes_1DL_E26B7E281
TaERF_1DL
9.02
181
3.82
3.78
AP2-like ethylene-responsive transcription factor
6
Traes_1AL_1B67D1299
9.11
388
4.25
2.42
Unknown protein
7
Traes_5DL_3A49B7207
9.4
118
3.09
0.20
Heat shock protein 21
8
Traes_4DS_033958E87
10.04
220
3.50
2.82
Early nodulin-like protein 22
9
Traes_2BL_172F729A7
10.57
356
3.44
2.07
Aluminum-induced protein with YGL and LRDR motifs
10
Traes_5DS_E58EBABFD
TaNCED_5DS
11
219
4.91
5.14
9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 3
11
Traes_1BL_6B21370DA
11.21
225
3.34
2.47
Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunits 1 and 2
12
Traes_2AL_B7FC2C090
11.47
261
3.39
2.86
Aluminum-induced protein with YGL and LRDR motifs
13
Traes_1DL_E331E6071
11.92
147
4.38
2.41
Protein kinase superfamily protein
14
Traes_1AL_61464BAA6
11.98
285
3.35
2.64
Unknown protein
CS, wheat cv. Chinese Spring; Log2FC, the log2 value of fold-change of WT vs. M6; JA, wheat cv.Jagger; NA, missed information of translation start codon in annotation.
EBE score value is calculated by the target finder with best possible score of 4.9 for Tal8.
Fig. 2.
TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL expression is associated with virulence. (A and B) The alignments of predicted EBE (highlighted in turquoise) in the promoters of TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL, respectively, with the RVDs of Tal8. (C) Lesion length measurements of low and high virulence strains of Xtu. (D) Expression levels of TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL in low and high virulence strains of Xtu. (E) Introduction of tal8 enhanced the lesion expansion for the low virulence strain LW16. LW16(ev), LW16 with empty vector pHM1; LW16(tal8), LW16 with tal8 in pHM1. (F) The lesion length measurements after 7 DPI with LW16(ev) and LW16(tal8). (G) Expression levels of TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL for M6 and LW16 strains with and without tal8. Mock, water inoculation. Leaves infiltrated with bacterial inoculum (OD600nm = 0.2) were sampled at 1 DPI for all qRT-PCR assays.
Candidate genes targeted by Tal8CS, wheat cv. Chinese Spring; Log2FC, the log2 value of fold-change of WT vs. M6; JA, wheat cv.Jagger; NA, missed information of translation start codon in annotation.EBE score value is calculated by the target finder with best possible score of 4.9 for Tal8.TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL expression is associated with virulence. (A and B) The alignments of predicted EBE (highlighted in turquoise) in the promoters of TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL, respectively, with the RVDs of Tal8. (C) Lesion length measurements of low and high virulence strains of Xtu. (D) Expression levels of TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL in low and high virulence strains of Xtu. (E) Introduction of tal8 enhanced the lesion expansion for the low virulence strain LW16. LW16(ev), LW16 with empty vector pHM1; LW16(tal8), LW16 with tal8 in pHM1. (F) The lesion length measurements after 7 DPI with LW16(ev) and LW16(tal8). (G) Expression levels of TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL for M6 and LW16 strains with and without tal8. Mock, water inoculation. Leaves infiltrated with bacterial inoculum (OD600nm = 0.2) were sampled at 1 DPI for all qRT-PCR assays.Xtu strains occur as 2 types: A short lesion or low virulence cohort, represented here by Xtu strains LW16, XT130, and XT5791, and a high virulence cohort, represented by XT4699, LG48, XT5523, XT5770, LB10, and P3 (Fig. 2). Low and high expression levels of TaNCED and TaERF were associated with low and high virulence strains, respectively (Fig. 2; primers used in this study are listed in ). Transfer of tal8 into the low virulence strain LW16 resulted in a strain with greater virulence (Fig. 2 ) and enhanced expression of TaNCED and TaERF (Fig. 2). Sequence analysis of representative low virulence strain LW16 and the high virulence strain P3 revealed that the chromosomes are colinear and contain 8 TAL effector genes in the same locations as XT4699 () (25, 26). The TAL effector genes of the 3 strains encode near-identical RVD repeats, with the exception that Tal8 of LW16, where the RVDs are highly dissimilar from XT4699 and P3 ().
TaNCED Induction Contributes to High Virulence.
Designer TAL effectors (dTALes) were constructed to target unique sequences in the TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL promoters, respectively, in order to induce each gene independently (). The dTALe dNCED72 targeted the EBE for Tal8 plus 3 additional nucleotides, while 3 other dTALes (dNCED41, dNCED53, and dNCED63) targeted the TATA box region downstream of the Tal8 EBE (Fig. 3). Three dTALes—dERF3, dERF4, and dERF6—targeted the promoter region of TaERF_1BL upstream of the original Tal8 EBE (Fig. 3). The dTALes were introduced individually into the Tal8-deficient low virulence strain LW16, which was used due to the higher natural competency for DNA transfer, and the strains were tested for the ability to promote expression of TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL, respectively. The dTALe dNCED72 triggered the highest expression of TaNCED_5BS (Fig. 3). However, dNCED72 also resulted in TaERF_1BL expression and, therefore, did not discriminate between the 2 genes (Fig. 3). The dTALes dNCED41, dNCED53, and dNCED63 directed expression of TaNCED_5BS without concomitant expression of TaERF_1BL (Fig. 3), and the dTALes dERF3, dERF4, and dERF6 each induced high levels of TaERF_1BL without TaNCED_5BS induction (Fig. 3). Expression levels were so high for the ERF dTALes that we were concerned the high levels might have pleiotropic effects on the host physiology and, as a consequence, disease symptom expression. As an added caution, dERF101 was designed by the introduction of 4 RVDs with suboptimal matches with the corresponding nucleotides in the EBE for dERF3. LW16 carrying the dERF101 had lower induction on TaERF_1BL, although induction was higher in comparison to Tal8 (Fig. 3). Upon inoculation of the strains with the dTALes on wheat, transformants carrying dTALes dNCED41, dNCED53, dNCED63, or dNCED72 enhanced virulence (Fig. 3). Transformants harboring dERF3, dERF4, dERF6, or dERF101, targeting TaERF_1BL alone, did not promote virulence (Fig. 3). The dTALes were also tested in the original tal8 mutant strain M6 with similar results. The dTALes for TaERF_1BL and TaNCED_5BS induced the respective target genes, while only dNCED63 enhanced virulence based on lesion length (). Therefore, pathogen virulence, in both LW16 and XT4699 and, conversely, host susceptibility are associated with NCED expression but not ERF expression.
Fig. 3.
TaNCED_5BS expression is correlated with enhanced virulence. (A) Four dTALes (dNCED41, dNCED53, dNCED63, and dNCED72) designed for the promoter region of TaNCED_5BS. (B) Four dTALes (dERF3, dERF4, dERF6, and dERF101) designed for the promoter region of TaERF_1BL. dERF101 were specifically designed with 4 fewer optimal matches, shown in lowercase letters, for reducing gene expression level. (C) Expression of TaNCED_5BS and not TaERF_1BL as measured by qRT-PCR by dNCED41, dNCED53, and dNCED63, while dNCED72 and Tal8 triggered expression of both genes. (D) Relative expression of TaERF_1BL based on qRT-PCR by dERF3, dERF4, dERF6, and dERF101. The lowercase letters indicate significantly different groups (P < 0.05) in the Tukey statistic and ANOVA analysis. (E) Lesion length measurements at 7 DPI with LW16 strains harboring dTALes, tal8, or empty vector (ev). ***P < 0.001, significant difference relative to lesion lengths of LW16(ev) (red dashed line) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and ANOVA analysis. (F) The EBE in the TaNCED_5BS directs Tal8-dependent transient GUS expression in N. benthamiana. Photographs of representative leaf disks are shown above each column stained with X-Gluc. The values indicate means ± SD (n = 4). Values with the same lowercase letters do not differ significantly (P < 0.05) by Tukey statistic and ANOVA analysis. Details about the Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression are described in .
TaNCED_5BS expression is correlated with enhanced virulence. (A) Four dTALes (dNCED41, dNCED53, dNCED63, and dNCED72) designed for the promoter region of TaNCED_5BS. (B) Four dTALes (dERF3, dERF4, dERF6, and dERF101) designed for the promoter region of TaERF_1BL. dERF101 were specifically designed with 4 fewer optimal matches, shown in lowercase letters, for reducing gene expression level. (C) Expression of TaNCED_5BS and not TaERF_1BL as measured by qRT-PCR by dNCED41, dNCED53, and dNCED63, while dNCED72 and Tal8 triggered expression of both genes. (D) Relative expression of TaERF_1BL based on qRT-PCR by dERF3, dERF4, dERF6, and dERF101. The lowercase letters indicate significantly different groups (P < 0.05) in the Tukey statistic and ANOVA analysis. (E) Lesion length measurements at 7 DPI with LW16 strains harboring dTALes, tal8, or empty vector (ev). ***P < 0.001, significant difference relative to lesion lengths of LW16(ev) (red dashed line) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and ANOVA analysis. (F) The EBE in the TaNCED_5BS directs Tal8-dependent transient GUS expression in N. benthamiana. Photographs of representative leaf disks are shown above each column stained with X-Gluc. The values indicate means ± SD (n = 4). Values with the same lowercase letters do not differ significantly (P < 0.05) by Tukey statistic and ANOVA analysis. Details about the Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression are described in .
Tal8 Directs Expression in Tobacco.
Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression assays on Nicotiana benthamiana leaves were used to corroborate Tal8-directed expression specifically from the TaNCED_5BS and TaNCED_5DS promoters (). When fused with the reporter gene uidA for β-glucuronidase (GUS), the native promoters of TaNCED_5BS and TaNCED_5DS resulted in low GUS activity when coexpressed with Tal8 under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter, although the TaNCED_5BS promoter gave higher expression levels than TaNCED_5DS (Fig. 3, Tal8+NCEDB and Tal8_NCEDD, respectively). As the wheat promoters may not function efficiently in N. benthamiana, the Tal8 EBEs for TaNCED_5BS and TaNCED_5DS were embedded in a truncated promoter for CsLob1 (CsLobT) from citrus, which is efficiently expressed in tobacco (27). CsLob1 and the derivative CsLobT contain the EBE for the TAL effector PthA4. CsLobT directed expression only when containing the Tal8 EBE from TaNCED_5BS or TaNCED_5DS and cotransformed with CaMV 35S regulated Tal8 or, as a control, CaMV 35S regulated PthA4 (Fig. 3, Tal8+CsLobT, Tal8+EBEB-CsLobT, Tal8+EBED-CsLobT, and PthA4+CsLobT, respectively). Again, the EBE from TaNCED_5BS (EBEB) functioned better than the EBE from TaNCED_5DS (EBED) in the context of CsLobT, which is consistent with the RNA-seq data. GUS activity was undetectable with the promoter constructs EBEB-CsLobT and EBED-CsLobT in the absence of Tal8 (Fig. 3, ev+EBEB-CsLobT and ev+EBED-CsLobT, respectively). The results corroborate the hypothesis that EBEB and EBED mediate Tal8-associated expression of TaNCED_5BS (and TaNCED_5DS).
Increased ABA Content Is Associated with Virulence.
NCED activity is the first committed step in the biosynthetic pathway for ABA, and 3 predicted products from the wheat genes on the short arm of chromosome 5 are most closely related to OsNCED5 and OsNCED3 of rice and ZmVP14 of maize, 2 of which have been shown to be involved in ABA biosynthesis () (28, 29). Indeed, the ABA content rose in infected leaf tissues upon NCED expression as measured by a competitive ELISA (). Mock inoculations or inoculations with LW16 (ev), which does not induce the expression of TaNCED_5BS, were associated with low amounts of ABA in leaves (Fig. 4). LW16 carrying dERF4 and dERF6 also did not enhance the ABA levels (Fig. 4). Inoculations with LW16, containing dNCED41, dNCED53, dNCED63, dNCED72, or tal8, had high ABA levels (Fig. 4). To determine if ABA was consequential to virulence, ABA was applied to leaves, which were challenged by low virulence pathogen. ABA application followed by LW16 (ev) inoculation resulted in 7-fold increase in lesion length along the leaf blade (Fig. 4 ) and higher bacterial populations in distal sections of the leaves in comparison to the control treatment without ABA (Fig. 4, section 2).
Fig. 4.
Enhanced virulence is associated with elevated levels of ABA. (A) ABA levels in inoculated and control wheat leaves at 1 DPI with the indicated strains. The values showed the means ± SD. Significant difference was indicated above the column of ABA content of each sample with P value (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001) relative to ABA content of LW16(ev) treatment by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and ANOVA analysis. The nonsignificant differences in the same statistical analysis are designated by “ns.” (B) Photograph of wheat leaves after inoculation with LW16(ev) with and without exogenous ABA treatment at 7 DPI. Sections indicate regions selected for population measurements as presented below. (C) Lesion length measurements of LW16(ev) inoculated leaves sprayed with or without ABA. ***P < 0.001, significant difference relative to lesion lengths of LW16(ev) without ABA spray in Student’s t test. (D) Bacterial population of LW16(ev) in whole leaf or leaf sections (6 cm). Leaf sections were defined as in B. ***P < 0.001, significant difference between the 2 values in section 2 with Student’s t test.
Enhanced virulence is associated with elevated levels of ABA. (A) ABA levels in inoculated and control wheat leaves at 1 DPI with the indicated strains. The values showed the means ± SD. Significant difference was indicated above the column of ABA content of each sample with P value (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001) relative to ABA content of LW16(ev) treatment by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and ANOVA analysis. The nonsignificant differences in the same statistical analysis are designated by “ns.” (B) Photograph of wheat leaves after inoculation with LW16(ev) with and without exogenous ABA treatment at 7 DPI. Sections indicate regions selected for population measurements as presented below. (C) Lesion length measurements of LW16(ev) inoculated leaves sprayed with or without ABA. ***P < 0.001, significant difference relative to lesion lengths of LW16(ev) without ABA spray in Student’s t test. (D) Bacterial population of LW16(ev) in whole leaf or leaf sections (6 cm). Leaf sections were defined as in B. ***P < 0.001, significant difference between the 2 values in section 2 with Student’s t test.
Tal8 and ABA Alter Water Relations in the Host.
Plant pathogenic bacteria are hypothesized to engineer a favorable aqueous intercellular environment in the host (30–32). ABA, as the classic hormone in response to water-stress, might be hijacked to recruit and retain water at the site of infection. ABA induces stomatal closure and consequential reductions of gas and water transpiration. Indeed, transpiration, as well as water loss, were reduced in tissues infected with bacteria containing Tal8 (Fig. 5 ). Water-soaked lesions are thought to reflect release of water from mesophyll cells into the intercellular space (apoplast) upon infection. Here, we observed that ABA application by itself promoted water-soaking symptoms, indicating that the retention of water to the site of infection may also occur (Fig. 5). HopAM1 of P. syringae was reported to be effective in water-stressed plants (18). Here, the plants were tested under well-watered conditions. However, inoculation of plants under high humidity enhanced lesion lengths and reduced the differences between strains with and without Tal8 (Fig. 5), indicating the reduced water loss under higher humidity enhances disease and bacterial spread.
Fig. 5.
ABA effects on leaf physiology. (A) Transpiration rate was reduced in leaves infiltrated with LW16(tal8) in comparison to LW16(ev) at 1 DPI. Bacterial suspensions (OD600nm = 0.2) were applied. ***P < 0.001, significant difference between the 2 values with Student’s t test. (B) Water loss was inhibited in detached leaves infiltrated with LW16(tal8) compared to leaves inoculated by LW16(ev) at 1 DPI with bacterial inoculum (OD600nm = 0.2). (C) The water-soaked leaves photographed 1 d after spraying with ABA (100 µM) in 0.02% Silwet L–77. (D) Lesion length measurement of bacterial inoculations (OD600nm = 0.2) under high humidity (95%) and control humidity (50%) at 7 DPI. The lowercase letters indicate significantly different groups (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s HSD.
ABA effects on leaf physiology. (A) Transpiration rate was reduced in leaves infiltrated with LW16(tal8) in comparison to LW16(ev) at 1 DPI. Bacterial suspensions (OD600nm = 0.2) were applied. ***P < 0.001, significant difference between the 2 values with Student’s t test. (B) Water loss was inhibited in detached leaves infiltrated with LW16(tal8) compared to leaves inoculated by LW16(ev) at 1 DPI with bacterial inoculum (OD600nm = 0.2). (C) The water-soaked leaves photographed 1 d after spraying with ABA (100 µM) in 0.02% Silwet L–77. (D) Lesion length measurement of bacterial inoculations (OD600nm = 0.2) under high humidity (95%) and control humidity (50%) at 7 DPI. The lowercase letters indicate significantly different groups (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s HSD.
Tal8 Is Associated with Reduced Expression of TaNPR1.
ABA-mediated disease susceptibility has been hypothesized to be due to antagonism to the salicylic acid (SA) defense response (33–36). SA levels were measured over a 3-d period after infection. SA levels, both free and total, rose over a 3-d period after infection of wheat leaves with LW16 (ev), LW16(dNCED63), and LW16 (tal8) (). Free SA levels between the strains with and without tal8 rose to similar levels (). Total SA levels were also higher over the same period (). LW16(dNCED63) had the highest free and total SA (), although this strain, similar to the strain with tal8, also has enhanced lesion lengths and ABA content. Therefore, SA content did not vary strictly in relation to TaNCED expression. Application of SA, both by leaf spray or soil drench, did not alter susceptibility of LW16 with or without tal8 (). Nonetheless, changes in expression of wheat homologs of the master immune regulator and SA receptor gene TaNPR1 were observed in infected tissues by strains with or without tal8. Both A and D genome copies of the gene were lower in expression in the presence of Tal8 (Fig. 6). TaNPR1 suppression was correlated with NCED expression as a strain with dTALe targeting TaNCED (dNCED63) also suppressed NPR1 based on the expression of TaNPRI_3AS, while the strain with dERF101 failed to suppress (Fig. 6). Leaf infiltration of ABA resulted in the largest suppression TaNPR1 (Fig. 6). Reduced NPR1 expression was correlated with reduced expression of homologs of the NPR1-dependent defense gene PR1 (Fig. 6 ). SA levels, then, may be less relevant than NPR1 levels due to suppression of NPR1 expression by ABA.
Fig. 6.
Tal8 effector suppresses expression of NPR1 and PR1 in wheat. (A) Heatmap of TaNPR1 expression in 2 wheat cultivars after inoculation with the mutant (M6) or the WT strain XT4699. One and 2 asterisks indicate significant difference in the Chinese Spring (CS) comparison and in both Jagger (JA) and Chinese Spring (CS) comparisons, respectively (q value < 0.05). The boxed area indicates 2 predicted orthologs of NPRI in wheat. RPM represents reads per million of total reads. (B) Expression quantification by qRT-PCR of Traes_3AS_45D8C6A2A in cv. Jagger. The leaves infiltrated with bacterial inoculum at (OD600nm = 0.2) or 100 µM ABA were sampled at 1 DPI. Different letters indicate statistical significantly different groups (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s HSD. (C) Heatmap of PR1 genes in comparison of inoculated wheat samples between M6 and WT in wheat cv. JA. Three genes were suppressed in WT Xtu treatment. (D) Expression of 2 wheat PR1 genes was suppressed in cv. Chinese Spring (CS), respectively. The asterisk (*) indicates the significant difference under q value < 0.05.
Tal8 effector suppresses expression of NPR1 and PR1 in wheat. (A) Heatmap of TaNPR1 expression in 2 wheat cultivars after inoculation with the mutant (M6) or the WT strain XT4699. One and 2 asterisks indicate significant difference in the Chinese Spring (CS) comparison and in both Jagger (JA) and Chinese Spring (CS) comparisons, respectively (q value < 0.05). The boxed area indicates 2 predicted orthologs of NPRI in wheat. RPM represents reads per million of total reads. (B) Expression quantification by qRT-PCR of Traes_3AS_45D8C6A2A in cv. Jagger. The leaves infiltrated with bacterial inoculum at (OD600nm = 0.2) or 100 µM ABA were sampled at 1 DPI. Different letters indicate statistical significantly different groups (P < 0.05) by Tukey’s HSD. (C) Heatmap of PR1 genes in comparison of inoculated wheat samples between M6 and WT in wheat cv. JA. Three genes were suppressed in WT Xtu treatment. (D) Expression of 2 wheat PR1 genes was suppressed in cv. Chinese Spring (CS), respectively. The asterisk (*) indicates the significant difference under q value < 0.05.
Discussion
Plant-associated bacteria have multiple demonstrated mechanisms to alter the phytohormone content of the host. Here, we show that Xtu has adapted to wheat by targeting a susceptibility gene, TaNCED, principally the gene TaNCED_5BS on the short arm of chromosome 5B of hexaploid wheat, accessing phytohormone production directly through ectopic induction of otherwise regulated host pathways. We propose that the TAL effector Tal8 directly stimulates the pathway for ABA, mediated by interaction at the EBE in the promoters of TaNCED_5BS and TaNCED_5DS and, furthermore, that ABA enhances disease susceptibility. Promoter sequence similarities between TaNCED_5BS and TaERF_1BL result in the induction of both genes by Tal8, and the possibility exists that the similarities reflect coregulation and interaction in normal plants. ABA insensitive 4 (AIB4) and multiple drought-responsive element binding factors, which mediate control of many ABA responsive elements, are members of the AP2/ERF transcription factor family (37), and enhanced expression of 1 or more of these genes might act synergistically with ABA to enhance susceptibility. However, under the conditions used here, no evidence could be found for involvement of TaERF_1BL in virulence, independent of NCED expression. The candidate EBEs in both NCED genes directed expression in a Tal8-mediated manner in a transient expression system, and polymorphisms between the EBEs are reflected in differing levels of expression in vivo and in the transient expression system. Nonetheless, future genome editing of the EBEs will provide important corroborative evidence that the EBEs, indeed, are the critical Tal8 binding site.The benefits of Tal8 and consequential high ABA levels could be due to multiple factors. The effects of ABA on disease susceptibility has been attributed to 3 possible factors, which are not mutually exclusive: Suppression of SA pathway defense responses, inactivation of defense-related MAP kinases, and alteration of water availability at the infection site (17, 18, 33). The effects of humidity on lesion development and reduction of the differences between bacteria with and without Tal8 corroborates the importance of water relations. Rice mutants, for example, with severely reduced ABA levels, are resistant to infection by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, the agent of bacterial blight of rice, and reductions in stomatal conductance, water transpiration, and higher ABA content accompany bacterial blight infections of normal plants (38). In the latter study, no evidence could be found to support an alteration in SA signaling in contrast to 2 other studies of ABA content in disease susceptibility (34, 36). We found variable changes in free and total SA content of infected wheat leaves in association with TALe-mediated ABA increases and could not discern a firm contribution to disease susceptibility. At the same time, some contribution of SA cannot be ruled out. NPR1 plays essential roles in localized and systemic acquired resistance in many plant species and overexpression of NPR1 in wheat enhances disease resistance (39, 40). Reduced expression of TaNPR1, which is involved in SA perception, was observed and, coincidently, is a unique finding for an effector function. These data indicate that ABA production induced by Tal8 may impact susceptibility to Xtu by suppressing the ability of the plant to perceive SA. Similar antagonistic relationships between ABA and NPR1 have been observed in other plant species, for example NPR1 protein degradation is stimulated by ABA in Arabidopsis (41). Suppression of NPR1 expression by ABA has also been observed in rice (35, 36), indicating that ABA-mediated regulation of NPR1 maybe a conserved function of ABA in phytohormone cross-talk. The effects of Tal8 or ABA, directly, on MPK6 and MPK3 phosphorylation were not measured for Xtu infections, but inactivation of the defense-related kinases, as observed previously in Arabidopsis, may also contribute to enhance susceptibility of the host (17).The enhancement of ABA levels by the TAL effector directed expression of NCED joins a growing list of TAL effector-mediated changes in host susceptibility. Rice is essentially immune to bacterial blight, if not for TAL effector-mediated induction of 1 of the SWEET gene family by strains of X. oryzae pv. oryzae, the products of which transport sucrose and, by an unknown mechanism, enhance host susceptibility (42). SWEET gene induction also occurs in bacterial angular spot disease of cotton and bacterial blight of cassava (43, 44). The benefits of SWEET gene expression have been attributed to the elevated access to sugar as a nutrient for pathogen growth (45). Three host transcription factor genes are known to be targeted in diseases of pepper, citrus, and tomato (27, 31, 46). The latter 2 cases are associated with coexpression of cell wall degradative enzymes, which may release of bacteria from the infection site or alter water content of the infected tissue (31). In the case of Xtu, increased release of bacteria from the leaf surface was not detected. Nonetheless, bacteria were found to spread farther up and down the leaf in the presence of NCED expression. The spread could be driven by water flow into the infected area due to stomatal closure, enhanced bacterial growth by a more aqueous environment, or a combination of ABA effects. A variety of additional TAL effector host targets are associated with virulence effects (47–49). TAL effectors, therefore, represent a versatile method to manipulate host susceptibility, and the list of TALe-mediated changes in plant physiological processes potentially affecting disease susceptibility is growing (50). The mechanisms by which known host S genes mediate enhanced virulence are poorly understood. Due to the extensive knowledge of ABA function, the consequences of Tal8 seem amenable for further elucidation.
Materials and Methods
The wheat plants were grown and inoculated for virulence assays in growth chambers with control conditions as described in . Bacteria and plasmids used in this study are provided in . Methods on RNA-seq analyses, prediction of candidate S genes for Tal8 and heatmap constructions, and sequence analysis of additional low and high virulence strains of Xtu are provided in detail in . Repeats of dTALes were assembled following methods described previously (51, 52). dTALes were cloned into broad host-range vector pHM1 and transformed into Xanthomonas bacteria for functional tests. Further methods on qRT-PCR analyses, transient GUS assay in N. benthamiana, ABA quantification assay, application of ABA and effect of Tal8 in wheat leaves, and SA measurement and application are described in detail in .
Authors: Li-Qing Chen; Bi-Huei Hou; Sylvie Lalonde; Hitomi Takanaga; Mara L Hartung; Xiao-Qing Qu; Woei-Jiun Guo; Jung-Gun Kim; William Underwood; Bhavna Chaudhuri; Diane Chermak; Ginny Antony; Frank F White; Shauna C Somerville; Mary Beth Mudgett; Wolf B Frommer Journal: Nature Date: 2010-11-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yang Hu; Junli Zhang; Hongge Jia; Davide Sosso; Ting Li; Wolf B Frommer; Bing Yang; Frank F White; Nian Wang; Jeffrey B Jones Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Xiu-Fang Xin; Kinya Nomura; Kyaw Aung; André C Velásquez; Jian Yao; Freddy Boutrot; Jeff H Chang; Cyril Zipfel; Sheng Yang He Journal: Nature Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sheri A McClerklin; Soon Goo Lee; Christopher P Harper; Ron Nwumeh; Joseph M Jez; Barbara N Kunkel Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Tuan T Tran; Alvaro L Pérez-Quintero; Issa Wonni; Sara C D Carpenter; Yanhua Yu; Li Wang; Jan E Leach; Valérie Verdier; Sébastien Cunnac; Adam J Bogdanove; Ralf Koebnik; Mathilde Hutin; Boris Szurek Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Sujan Timilsina; Neha Potnis; Eric A Newberry; Prabha Liyanapathiranage; Fernanda Iruegas-Bocardo; Frank F White; Erica M Goss; Jeffrey B Jones Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Javier García-Andrade; Beatriz González; Miguel Gonzalez-Guzman; Pedro L Rodriguez; Pablo Vera Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Carlos A Zárate-Chaves; Daniela Osorio-Rodríguez; Rubén E Mora; Álvaro L Pérez-Quintero; Alexis Dereeper; Silvia Restrepo; Camilo E López; Boris Szurek; Adriana Bernal Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2021-02-04
Authors: James T Tambong; Renlin Xu; Suzanne Gerdis; Greg C Daniels; Denise Chabot; Keith Hubbard; Michael W Harding Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 5.640