Literature DB >> 31575512

Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after multiligament knee injury using a delayed ligament reconstruction approach: A single-center experience.

Michael Hantes1, Apostolos Fyllos2, Fotios Papageorgiou2, Konstantinos Alexiou2, Ioannis Antoniou2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present long-term clinical and radiological results of patients treated with delayed reconstruction of multiligament knee injuries.
METHODS: Clinical data from 26 patients (21 men, five women, mean age 27.44 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were evaluated at final follow-up with the use of: The International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity level, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol subjective knee evaluation form, and KT-2000 arthrometer. Mean follow-up time was 105.38 months. Both knees were radiographically evaluated for osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification.
RESULTS: No patient required mobilization under anesthesia for adhesion lysis at the immediate or later postoperative duration. There was no statistically significant difference in range of motion between the healthy and operated sides (P = 0.713). Mean time to final range of motion regain was 2.1 ± 0.4 months. Average KT-2000 side-to-side (operated vs. normal) difference was 2.03 ± 1.1 mm, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.007). The mean IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, Tegner, and Euroqol-5D postoperative scores were 82.13 ± 17.5, 84.59 ± 16.8, 90.6 ± 6.4, 4.3 ± 1.3, and 80 ± 11.74, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that age and follow-up time had significant effects on each clinical score, except for the Lysholm and Tegner scores. Progression of osteoarthritic changes of the reconstructed knee and its contralateral side was significantly different (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Excellent clinical results were reported from this center's long-term experience with delayed ligament reconstruction, and osteoarthritic changes of reconstructed knees were recorded.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee osteoarthritis; Ligament reconstruction; Multiligament knee injury

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31575512     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  4 in total

1.  Clinical studies of single-stage combined ACL and PCL reconstruction variably report graft tensioning, fixation sequence, and knee flexion angle at time of fixation.

Authors:  Aly M Fayed; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Darren de Sa; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Acute Versus Delayed Surgical Intervention in Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ryan S Marder; Husain Poonawala; Jorge I Pincay; Frank Nguyen; Patrick F Cleary; Christine S Persaud; Qais Naziri; Bashir A Zikria
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-13

3.  J-bone graft with double locking plate: a symphony of mechanics and biology for atrophic distal femoral non-union with bone defect.

Authors:  Jian Lu; Shang-Chun Guo; Qi-Yang Wang; Jia-Gen Sheng; Shi-Cong Tao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Current concepts in the assessment and management of multiligament injuries of the knee.

Authors:  Waldo Scheepers; Vikas Khanduja; Michael Held
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2021-12-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.