Literature DB >> 31575349

Humans falling in holes: adaptations in lower-limb joint mechanics in response to a rapid change in substrate height during human hopping.

Taylor J M Dick1, Laksh K Punith2, Gregory S Sawicki2.   

Abstract

In getting from here to there, we continuously negotiate complex environments and unpredictable terrain. Our ability to stay upright in the face of obstacles, such as holes in the ground, is quite remarkable. However, we understand relatively little about how humans adjust limb mechanical behaviour to recover from unexpected perturbations. In this study, we determined how the joints of the lower-limb respond to recover from a rapid, unexpected drop in substrate height during human hopping. We recorded lower-limb kinematics and kinetics while subjects performed steady-state hopping at their preferred frequency on an elevated platform (5, 10 and 20 cm). At an unknown time, we elicited an unexpected perturbation (i.e. a hole in the ground) via the rapid removal of the platform. Based on previous research in bipedal birds, we hypothesized (i) that distal joints would play an increased role in fall recovery when compared to steady-state hopping, and (ii) that patterns of joint power redistribution would be more pronounced with increases in perturbation height. Our results suggest that humans successfully recover from falling in a hole by increasing the energy absorbed predominantly in distal lower-limb joints (i.e. the ankle) across perturbation heights ranging from 5 to 10 cm. However, with increased perturbation height (20 cm) humans increase their reliance on the more proximal lower-limb joints (i.e. the knee and the hip) to absorb mechanical energy and stabilize fall recovery. Further investigations into the muscle-tendon mechanics underlying these joint-level responses will likely provide additional insights into the neuromotor control strategies used to regain the stability following unexpected perturbations and provide biological inspiration for the future design of wearable devices capable of performing within unpredictable environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balance; biomechanics; inverse dynamics; locomotion; lower-limb joint mechanical power; perturbation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31575349      PMCID: PMC6833322          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  41 in total

1.  Running over rough terrain: guinea fowl maintain dynamic stability despite a large unexpected change in substrate height.

Authors:  Monica A Daley; James R Usherwood; Gladys Felix; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Running stability is enhanced by a proximo-distal gradient in joint neuromechanical control.

Authors:  M A Daley; G Felix; A A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Balance control in stepping down expected and unexpected level changes.

Authors:  Jaap H van Dieën; Marcel Spanjaard; Reinier Konemann; Lennart Bron; Mirjam Pijnappels
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Hitting a support surface at unexpected height during walking induces loading transients.

Authors:  Marleen H van der Linden; Henk T Hendricks; Bastiaan R Bloem; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement.

Authors:  Scott L Delp; Frank C Anderson; Allison S Arnold; Peter Loan; Ayman Habib; Chand T John; Eran Guendelman; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Exploiting elasticity: Modeling the influence of neural control on mechanics and energetics of ankle muscle-tendons during human hopping.

Authors:  Benjamin D Robertson; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; R A Brand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Quantifying Achilles tendon force in vivo from ultrasound images.

Authors:  Taylor J M Dick; Allison S Arnold; James M Wakeling
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Mechanical work as an indirect measure of subjective costs influencing human movement.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of a powered ankle-foot orthosis on perturbed standing balance.

Authors:  Amber R Emmens; Edwin H F van Asseldonk; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  5 in total

1.  Which lower limb joints compensate for destabilizing energy during walking in humans?

Authors:  Pawel R Golyski; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

2.  Tuning of feedforward control enables stable muscle force-length dynamics after loss of autogenic proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Joanne C Gordon; Natalie C Holt; Andrew Biewener; Monica A Daley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Standing on unstable surface challenges postural control of tracking tasks and modulates neuromuscular adjustments specific to task complexity.

Authors:  Lida Mademli; Dimitra Mavridi; Sebastian Bohm; Dimitrios A Patikas; Alessandro Santuz; Adamantios Arampatzis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Series elasticity facilitates safe plantar flexor muscle-tendon shock absorption during perturbed human hopping.

Authors:  Taylor J M Dick; Christofer J Clemente; Laksh K Punith; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Biological system energy algorithm reflected in sub-system joint work distribution movement strategies: influence of strength and eccentric loading.

Authors:  Jeffrey M McBride; Sophia Nimphius
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.