| Literature DB >> 31574964 |
Jung-Min Park1, Sihwa Park2, Yong-Seok Jee3,4.
Abstract
Background and objective: This study investigated the therapeutic effect of applying local body vibration (LBV) with built-in vibroacoustic sound on patients who had an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: pain; parasympathetic activation; peak torque; range of motion; symptoms; vibration
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31574964 PMCID: PMC6843143 DOI: 10.3390/medicina55100659
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Figure 1Participant allocation (consolidated standards for reporting of trials flow diagram).
Characteristics of the participants.
| Items | Groups | Z | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBVG (n = 11) | nLBVG (n = 13) | |||
| Age, year | 26.82 ± 12.08 | 31.31 ± 16.49 | −0.150 | 0.910 |
| Height, cm | 173.00 ± 4.02 | 174.23 ± 2.35 | −0.703 | 0.494 |
| Weight, kg | 74.00 ± 5.37 | 75.50 ± 6.54 | −0.321 | 0.776 |
| Muscle mass, kg | 36.04 ± 5.99 | 36.94 ± 4.26 | −0.933 | 0.361 |
| Fat mass, kg | 14.09 ± 5.38 | 15.38 ± 3.60 | −1.341 | 0.186 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.72 ± 1.57 | 24.85 ± 1.72 | −0.349 | 0.733 |
All data represent the mean ± standard deviation. LBVG and nLBVG mean local body vibration group and non-local body vibration group, respectively. Symbol * was analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U test.
Rehabilitation program for the local body vibration group.
| Type (Length) | Program Type | Intensity/Time |
|---|---|---|
| Warm-up | Cycling | RPE 13/15 min |
| Upper and lower leg stretching | RPE 13/20 min | |
| 1st workout phase | Vibroacoustic intervention (331.6 Hz) | 20% × 1658 Hz × 30 min |
| Q-set | 5 s × 10 reps × 3 sets | |
| Straight leg raise | 12 reps × 3 sets | |
| Ball adduction | 6 s × 10 reps × 3 sets | |
| Half squat | 10 reps × 3 sets | |
| Weight shift | 15 reps × 3 sets | |
| Weight bearing | 15 reps × 3 sets | |
| Calf raise | 10 reps × 3 sets | |
| Balance on floor | 2 min × 3 sets | |
| 2nd workout phase | Vibroacoustic intervention (663.2 Hz) | 40% × 1658 Hz × 30 min |
| Q-set | 10 s × 10 reps × 3 sets | |
| Straight leg raise | 15 reps × 3 sets | |
| Ball adduction | 8 s × 10 reps × 4 sets | |
| Leg press | 10 reps × 3 sets | |
| Leg extension | 15 reps × 3 sets | |
| Leg curl | 15 reps × 3 sets | |
| Half squat | 12 reps × 3 sets | |
| Calf raise | 12 reps × 3 sets | |
| Balance on pad | 4 min × 3 sets | |
| 3rd workout phase | Vibroacoustic intervention (994.8 Hz) | 60% × 1658 Hz × 30 min |
| Ball adduction | 10 s × 10 reps × 4 sets | |
| Leg press | 12 reps × 3 sets | |
| Leg extension | 15 reps × 3 sets | |
| Leg curl | 15 reps × 3 sets | |
| Half squat | 15 reps × 3 sets | |
| Calf raise | 15 reps × 3 sets | |
| Balance on air-pad | 6 min × 3 sets | |
| Cool-down | Upper and lower leg stretching | RPE 13–15/20 min |
| Icing | 10 min |
Note: RPE, ratings of perceived exertion or Borg scale.
Figure 2Vibroacoustic intervention applied on an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Differences and changes in psychological scales.
| Item | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | LBVG (n = 11) | nLBVG (n = 13) | Z ( | |
| Pain | 0 | 7.56 ± 1.21 | 7.70 ± 1.58 | −0.511 (0.649) |
| 4 | 4.10 ± 1.44 | 4.53 ± 1.20 | −0.503 (0.649) | |
| 8 | 2.13 ± 0.90 | 4.54 ± 1.33 | −3.661 (0.001) | |
| 20.150 (0.001) | 17.280 (0.001) | |||
| Anxiety | 0 | 6.39 ± 1.09 | 6.10 ± 1.24 | −1.000 (0.361) |
| 4 | 3.72 ± 0.64 | 4.08 ± 0.95 | −1.193 (0.277) | |
| 8 | 3.01 ± 0.91 | 3.58 ± 0.95 | −1.230 (0.252) | |
| 17.714 (0.001) | 17.522 (0.001) | |||
| Symptom | 0 | 7.04 ± 1.46 | 7.12 ± 1.89 | −0.353 (0.733) |
| 4 | 3.50 ± 1.16 | 6.71 ± 1.10 | −4.119 (0.001) | |
| 8 | 2.31 ± 0.90 | 3.95 ± 1.21 | −3.090 (0.002) | |
| 18.558 (0.001) | 12.875 (0.002) | |||
All data represent the mean ± standard deviation. LBVG and nLBVG are the local body vibration group and non-local body vibration group, respectively. Symbols * and ** were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U test and the Friedman test, respectively.
Differences and changes in cardiorespiratory variables.
| Item | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | LBVG (n = 11) | nLBVG (n = 13) | Z ( | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 0 | 135.09 ± 5.17 | 134.69 ± 12.59 | −0.351 (0.733) |
| 4 | 127.09 ± 12.99 | 126.23 ± 7.17 | −0.350 (0.733) | |
| 8 | 123.45 ± 5.63 | 124.31 ± 4.85 | −0.235 (0.820) | |
| 13.905 (0.001) | 7.714 (0.021) | |||
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 0 | 80.55 ± 7.15 | 81.38 ± 12.49 | −0.991 (0.331) |
| 4 | 79.73 ± 7.73 | 79.08 ± 11.11 | −0.872 (0.392) | |
| 8 | 79.09 ± 7.11 | 81.15 ± 11.01 | −1.546 (0.134) | |
| 0.800 (0.670) | 0.792 (0.673) | |||
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 0 | 77.09 ± 6.47 | 71.08 ± 8.30 | −1.887 (0.063) |
| 4 | 73.45 ± 6.22 | 78.62 ± 9.99 | −1.457 (0.150) | |
| 8 | 69.09 ± 7.71 | 73.69 ± 7.22 | −1.484 (0.150) | |
| 11.538 (0.003) | 3.720 (0.156) | |||
| Breathing rate (reps.) | 0 | 29.61 ± 7.16 | 27.65 ± 5.54 | −1.251 (0.228) |
| 4 | 19.85 ± 4.19 | 19.14 ± 3.06 | −0.611 (0.569) | |
| 8 | 19.60 ± 4.34 | 18.94 ± 3.48 | −0.669 (0.531) | |
| 13.818 (0.001) | 16.769 (0.001) | |||
All data represent the mean ± standard deviation. LBVG and nLBVG are the local body vibration group and non-local body vibration group, respectively. Symbols * and ** were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and Friedman test, respectively.
Differences and changes in autonomic nerve system variables.
| Item | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | LBVG (n = 11) | nLBVG (n = 13) | Z ( | |
| Sympathetic | 0 | 7.61 ± 0.72 | 7.23 ± 0.51 | −1.352 (0.186) |
| 4 | 6.32 ± 0.63 | 7.69 ± 1.15 | −3.023 (0.002) | |
| 8 | 5.77 ± 0.57 | 6.46 ± 1.33 | −1.257 (0.228) | |
| 14.727 (0.001) | 7.882 (0.019) | |||
| Parasympathetic | 0 | 3.55 ± 0.40 | 3.42 ± 0.38 | −0.849 (0.424) |
| 4 | 4.49 ± 0.36 | 3.58 ± 0.40 | −4.003 (0.001) | |
| 8 | 4.96 ± 0.28 | 3.50 ± 0.46 | −4.162 (0.001) | |
| 22.000 (0.001) | 2.923 (0.232) | |||
All data represent the mean ± standard deviation. LBVG and nLBVG are the local body vibration group and non-local body vibration group, respectively. Symbols * and ** were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U test and Friedman test, respectively.
Differences and changes in strength and range of motion in the knee joint.
| Item | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | LBVG (n = 11) | nLBVG (n = 13) | Z ( | |
| Extensor peak torque | 0 | 77.82 ± 12.91 | 70.00 ± 6.53 | −2.311 (0.022) |
| 4 | 123.09 ± 35.18 | 100.15 ± 33.83 | −1.574 (0.119) | |
| 8 | 178.73 ± 27.45 | 110.23 ± 53.88 | −3.229 (0.001) | |
| 13.273 (0.001) | 1.385 (0.500) | |||
| Flexor peak torque | 0 | 52.36 ± 5.24 | 47.08 ± 10.47 | −1.196 (0.252) |
| 4 | 63.91 ± 6.24 | 43.08 ± 16.27 | −3.286 (0.001) | |
| 8 | 68.00 ± 10.26 | 50.23 ± 19.43 | −2.052 (0.041) | |
| 17.636 (0.001) | 3.231 (0.199) | |||
| Range of motion | 0 | 94.55 ± 16.05 | 86.00 ± 15.35 | −1.279 (0.207) |
| 4 | 121.73 ± 14.36 | 89.62 ± 17.47 | −3.604 (0.001) | |
| 8 | 127.82 ± 12.46 | 92.38 ± 27.65 | −2.970 (0.002) | |
| 19.860 (0.001) | 1.385 (0.500) | |||
All data represent the mean ± standard deviation. LBVG and nLBVG are the local body vibration group and non-local body vibration group, respectively. Symbols * and ** were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and Friedman test, respectively.