Mechanisms of action of molecules with anti-TNF-alpha activity on intestinal barrier inflammation: A systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), among cytokines that mediate the inflammatory process, plays an important role in diseases involving the loss of intestinal barrier integrity. Several molecules with anti-TNF-alpha activity have been studied aiming to develop new therapies. The purpose of this paper is to describe the systematic review protocol of experimental studies that determine mechanisms of action of molecules with anti-TNF-alpha activity on intestinal barrier inflammation.
METHODS: This protocol is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes Protocols (PRISMA-P). The databases to be searched are PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Experimental studies in rats or mice that assessed the activity of anti-TNF-alpha molecules in models of intestinal barrier inflammation will be included in the systematic review. Studies characteristics, experimental model, and main results will be described and the bias risk assessment will be performed. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. A narrative synthesis will be made for the included studies. Also, if sufficient data is available, a meta-analysis will be conducted. I statistics will be used to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS: The present protocol will assist in producing a systematic review that identifies the mechanisms underlying the reduction of TNF-alpha in intestinal barrier inflammation models.
CONCLUSION: The systematic review may contribute to the theoretical basis of research on new molecules with anti-TNF-alpha potential and, consequently, in the development of new therapies employed in humans. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019131862.

Introduction

The gastrointestinal mucosa separates internal from external environment, and allows only small antigens and microorganisms amounts cross the epithelium, preventing the passage of potentially harmful substances. This ability to protect the body from damage from the luminal content and mucosal permeability control constitutes the intestinal barrier function.[

Normal functioning of the intestinal barrier is fundamental for homeostasis, while the disruption of barrier mechanisms leads to increased mucosal permeability to luminal antigens and/or microorganisms that cross the intestinal epithelium and potentially induce epithelial-neuroimmune disorders that facilitate the gut inflammation development.[ Changes in barrier function have been widely implicated in the origin and development of many digestive diseases such as celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome and food allergies; and non-digestive, such as schizophrenia, diabetes, and sepsis.[

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) has been widely studied and reviewed in the scientific literature regarding its participation in mechanisms involving inflammation-related cell pathways in the intestinal barrier.[

TNF-alpha is a cytokine produced by several cell types; however, the main producers are monocytic lineage cells, such as macrophages. This cytokine plays a key role during stationary or pathological conditions, for example, infections, lesions, inflammation, and tumor development.[

Once released from macrophages, which constitute the first line of defense, TNF-alpha activates other immune cells and mediates the production of additional proinflammatory cytokines during inflammatory responses.[ TNF-alpha also has a direct impact on the intestinal epithelial barrier, since it directly disrupts the intestinal tight junctions.[

In this perspective, several studies aim to promote the protection or recovery of intestinal barrier integrity and functionality through substances with anti-TNF-alpha activity. Understanding how these molecules act is essential for the development of new drugs with more specific action to combat inflammation in the gut. Therefore, studies are needed to discuss the mechanisms of action of molecules with anti-TNF-alpha activity on the intestinal barrier.

When it comes to understanding the mechanisms of action of these substances, most studies are developed in animal models, mainly mice and rats, used in many fundamental investigations for understanding human organism physiology, as well as for the development of new medical therapies.[ Prior to clinical application several treatments are preceded by animal experiments. These experiments are important for studying the efficacy and/or safety of interventions for humans. In this sense, awareness has increased about the importance of conducting systematic reviews in the field of laboratory animal experimentation.[ We found recent examples of systematic reviews of animal studies[ and systematic review protocols on animal therapies and interventions.[

Thus, the aim of this paper is to describe the systematic review protocol with experimental studies that determine mechanisms of action of molecules with anti-TNF-alpha activity on intestinal barrier inflammation.

Methods

Protocol and registration

This protocol has been prepared according to the guidelines described in Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P).[ A 17-item checklist was used to improve the quality of the systematic review data.

The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on May 24, 2019 (CRD42019131862), and is available at: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019131862.

Eligibility criteria

Peer-reviewed journal articles that meet eligibility criteria based on study population, interventions, control, and outcomes (PICOS)[ will be included in the review.

Inclusion criteria

The review will include original articles resulting from experimental studies carried out in rats or mice of both sexes, without water or diet restriction, with diagnosis of intestine inflammation at the beginning of the experiment; studies evaluating therapy with anti-TNF-alpha molecule and the effect of this treatment on the intestinal barrier (protection/recovery/damage or lack of effect); studies with intestinal barrier cells of rats or mice that evaluated the same treatment and measured the same outcomes previously cited.

Exclusion criteria

Review articles, case reports, comments, editorials, letters to the editor, theses, conference proceedings will be excluded; studies with other animal/cell models; studies evaluating anti-TNF-alpha treatment in other inflammatory diseases; studies that do not present at least one measure of TNF-alpha reduction or its activity; studies that do not address mechanisms of action of the molecules studied to obtain the effects found.

Information sources and literature search

In the identification phase of the studies, search strategies will be developed based on keywords indexed in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Equations will be used with combinations of descriptors related to intestinal barrier, inflammation, and intervention using anti-TNF-alpha agents, accompanied by the boolean operator AND. The search strategies will be applied to the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and Science Direct (Table 1).

Table 1

Search strategies for each database.

Database searches will be performed independently by 2 researchers. Initial searches will test preliminary equations with the prospect of applying highly sensitive search strategies. Articles will be imported into Mendeley reference manager (1.17.11) and duplicates will be deleted.

The initial evaluation of the studies will be carried out by 2 reviewers independently by reading titles and abstracts, following the eligibility criteria. Then, the full text of the articles will be analyzed and studies that meet the inclusion criteria of the systematic review will be selected (Fig. 1). Disagreements that occur during the screening phases will be solved with the assistance of a third reviewer. The researchers will review the full text of all studies considered eligible for inclusion for analysis. The references of the included articles will also be reviewed to identify those potentially eligible studies not found in the database search, considered as manual search.

Figure 1

Article selection flowchart. Adapted from PRISMA-P.[ PRISMA-P = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols.

Data extraction

Data extraction will be done in a standardized manner by 2 researchers independently, using a spreadsheet prepared in the Microsoft Excel program. The following information will be entered in the spreadsheet: first author; year of publication; groups; number of animals per group; species; sex; average weight; average age; diet; way to induce inflammation in the intestinal barrier; type of molecule administered; quantity, time, frequency, route and vehicle of administration; dosage of TNF-alpha (serum, gene, or protein expression, etc); effects of treatment on the intestinal barrier (expression of tight junction proteins, intestinal permeability evaluation, epithelial damage score, histological analysis, etc); mechanisms discussed for the effects found; and other important information.

For any relevant data that is missing in the manuscripts, contact with the study authors will be attempted. If the required information is not obtained, the data will be excluded from analysis and addressed in the discussion section.

Risk of bias assessment

Two reviewers will assess the risk of bias in the selected studies and differences, if any, will be solved by consulting a third reviewer. For the assessment of risk of bias the SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool will be used.[ Reviewers will be previously trained and calibrated to ensure uniformity in criteria evaluation.

Data analysis and synthesis

A narrative synthesis of the included studies will be made. Results corresponding to the interventions effects will be described and will consider the difference in means and P values for the measurements assessed before and after the intervention. Comparative analyses performed between intervention groups and between intervention and control groups will be presented.

Heterogeneity between study results will be assessed using a standard chi-squared test with a significance level of 0.05. To assess heterogeneity, we plan to calculate the I2 statistic, which is a quantitative measure of inconsistency between studies. A value of 0% indicates no heterogeneity was observed, while I2 values of 50% indicate a substantial level of heterogeneity. If possible, funnel plots will be used to assess the presence of potential reporting biases. A linear regression approach will be used to evaluate funnel plot asymmetry.

Discussion

Studies about therapies that can help in prevention and treatment of diseases that affect the intestinal barrier integrity are relevant, as many of them present major challenges for the world's health-care systems. A systematic review study about the worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease highlighted that in the early 21st century these diseases became a global health problem with increasing incidence in newly industrialized countries in Asia, South America, and Africa, where societies have become more westernized. Regarding the estimated prevalence, although low in the mentioned countries, it continues to increase in North America, Oceania, and many European countries, surpassing 0.3%.[

In a systematic review by Pedersen et al[ regarding the important pathways for the management of inflammatory bowel diseases, the authors highlight that TNF-alpha plays a key role in the inflammatory cascade that orchestrates chronic intestinal inflammation, pointing that anti-TNF-alpha agents are the most effective anti-cytokine treatment for these diseases.

In this perspective, some therapies for intestinal diseases mainly involve the administration of anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibodies[ in conjunction with other broadly acting adjuvants such as corticosteroids, prebiotics, and probiotics.[ The literature presents several review studies that address the use of antibodies in anti-TNF-alpha therapy, especially in cases of inflammatory bowel disease.[

However, it is observed that a significant proportion of patients do not respond to induction therapy with antibodies or become intolerant due to loss of treatment effect over time. This therapy is also associated with the risk of infusion reactions.[ In addition, some patients do not meet eligibility criteria for antibody therapy, such as those diagnosed with active or latent tuberculosis, HIV, hepatitis B, or other active infections. Patients with a history of lymphoproliferative disorders, severe congestive heart failure, or demyelinating disease also should not be treated with this therapy.[ In this sense, the need to identify new treatment options for these diseases becomes urgent.

Due to limitations of classical therapies for the treatment of diseases in which TNF-alpha is involved in the disruption of intestinal barrier integrity mechanisms, many alternative molecules have been evaluated in order to develop new drugs.[ Curcumin derivatives,[ epicatechin,[ short-chain fatty acids,[ enzyme inhibitors,[ and even well-established drugs for other treatments[ have been employed to reduce the inflammatory process by reducing TNF-alpha, with effects on improving epithelial mucosal integrity.

Since such molecules are diverse, the question is how different structures achieve a common result. Database searches indicated the absence of systematic reviews that group the main mechanisms of action of molecules whose therapeutic proposal focuses on the reduction of TNF-alpha or its activity. Thus, the present protocol will assist in producing a systematic review that identifies the mechanisms underlying these effects in intestinal barrier inflammation models and may contribute to the theoretical basis of research on new molecules with anti-TNF-alpha potential and, consequently, in the development of new therapies employed in humans.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for the incentive by granting PhD scholarships, and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Award Number: 426116/2018-6 - CNPq).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Mayara Santa Rosa Lima, Vanessa Cristina Oliveira de Lima Grasiela Piuvezam, Ana Heloneida de Araújo Morais.

Formal analysis: Grasiela Piuvezam, Bruna Leal Lima Maciel, Ana Heloneida de Araújo Morais.

Funding acquisition: Ana Heloneida de Araújo Morais.

Investigation: Mayara Santa Rosa Lima, Vanessa Cristina Oliveira de Lima, Grasiela Piuvezam, Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo.

Methodology: Mayara Santa Rosa Lima, Vanessa Cristina Oliveira de Lima, Grasiela Piuvezam, Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo.

Supervision: Grasiela Piuvezam, Ana Heloneida de Araújo Morais.

Writing – original draft: Mayara Santa Rosa Lima, Vanessa Cristina Oliveira de Lima.

Writing – review & editing: Grasiela Piuvezam, Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo, Bruna Leal Lima Maciel, Ana Heloneida de Araújo Morais.

Mayara Santa Rosa Lima orcid: 0000-0003-3006-7700.

Vanessa Cristina Oliveira de Lima orcid: 0000-0002-5709-3805.

Grasiela Piuvezam orcid: 0000-0002-2343-7251.

Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo orcid: 0000-0002-7849-2661.

Bruna Leal Lima Maciel orcid: 0000-0002-0724-1961.

Ana Heloneida de Araújo Morais orcid: 0000-0002-6460-911X.