Moinay Kim1, Seungjoo Lee1, Jung Cheol Park1, Dong-Min Jang2, Seung Il Ha2, Joung-Uk Kim2, Jae Sung Ahn1, Wonhyoung Park3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: elevenes@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (ICG) video angiography has been widely used in cerebrovascular surgery. ICG injection is generally safe, with a low incidence of complications. ICG-related anaphylactic reactions during neurosurgery have been rarely reported. We report the cases of 2 patients who had experienced anaphylactic shock in response to intravenous ICG injection (DID Indocyanine Green [Dongindang, Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea]) during intracranial aneurysm (IA) surgery. CASE DESCRIPTION: The first patient, a 69-year-old woman with an unruptured IA, had been undergoing clipping surgery under general anesthesia. Immediately after ICG injection, her blood pressure suddenly decreased from 140/80 mm Hg to 50/30 mm Hg and she developed a skin rash on her abdomen and all extremities. Chest compression was initiated, and her vital signs gradually recovered to their pre-ICG levels within 10 minutes. The second patient was a 58-year-old woman with an unruptured IA who had been undergoing clipping surgery. After ICG injection, her blood pressure had decreased from 130/80 mm Hg to 60/40 mm Hg, and a rash-like skin lesion was observed on her abdomen. After intravenous injection of norepinephrine and dexamethasone, her blood pressure recovered to its pre-ICG level within 30 minutes and remained stable thereafter. The postoperative ICG skin provocation test findings were positive for both patients; however, only 1 patient showed markedly increased serum tryptase levels. CONCLUSION: Despite the rarity of ICG-related anaphylaxis, clinicians should be aware of this unexpected, but potentially life-threatening, drug reaction in patients undergoing cerebrovascular surgery.
BACKGROUND:Indocyanine green (ICG) video angiography has been widely used in cerebrovascular surgery. ICG injection is generally safe, with a low incidence of complications. ICG-related anaphylactic reactions during neurosurgery have been rarely reported. We report the cases of 2 patients who had experienced anaphylactic shock in response to intravenous ICG injection (DID Indocyanine Green [Dongindang, Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea]) during intracranial aneurysm (IA) surgery. CASE DESCRIPTION: The first patient, a 69-year-old woman with an unruptured IA, had been undergoing clipping surgery under general anesthesia. Immediately after ICG injection, her blood pressure suddenly decreased from 140/80 mm Hg to 50/30 mm Hg and she developed a skin rash on her abdomen and all extremities. Chest compression was initiated, and her vital signs gradually recovered to their pre-ICG levels within 10 minutes. The second patient was a 58-year-old woman with an unruptured IA who had been undergoing clipping surgery. After ICG injection, her blood pressure had decreased from 130/80 mm Hg to 60/40 mm Hg, and a rash-like skin lesion was observed on her abdomen. After intravenous injection of norepinephrine and dexamethasone, her blood pressure recovered to its pre-ICG level within 30 minutes and remained stable thereafter. The postoperative ICG skin provocation test findings were positive for both patients; however, only 1 patient showed markedly increased serum tryptase levels. CONCLUSION: Despite the rarity of ICG-related anaphylaxis, clinicians should be aware of this unexpected, but potentially life-threatening, drug reaction in patients undergoing cerebrovascular surgery.
Authors: William A Zammarrelli; Anoushka M Afonso; Vance Broach; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; Jennifer J Mueller; Mario M Leitao; Amelia Chan; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.304