Literature DB >> 31574176

Quantum-inspired algorithm for radiotherapy planning optimization.

Julia M Pakela1,2, Huan-Hsin Tseng2, Martha M Matuszak2, Randall K Ten Haken2, Daniel L McShan2, Issam El Naqa1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Modern inverse radiotherapy treatment planning requires nonconvex, large-scale optimizations that must be solved within a clinically feasible timeframe. We have developed and tested a quantum-inspired, stochastic algorithm for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT): quantum tunnel annealing (QTA). By modeling the likelihood probability of accepting a higher energy solution after a particle tunneling through a potential energy barrier, QTA features an additional degree of freedom (the barrier width, w) not shared by traditional stochastic optimization methods such as Simulated Annealing (SA). This additional degree of freedom can improve convergence rates and achieve a more efficient and, potentially, effective treatment planning process.
METHODS: To analyze the character of the proposed QTA algorithm, we chose two stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) liver cases of variable complexity. The "easy" first case was used to confirm functionality, while the second case, with a more challenging geometry, was used to characterize and evaluate the QTA algorithm performance. Plan quality was assessed using dose-volume histogram-based objectives and dose distributions. Due to the stochastic nature of the solution search space, extensive tests were also conducted to determine the optimal smoothing technique, ensuring balance between plan deliverability and the resulting plan quality. QTA convergence rates were investigated in relation to the chosen barrier width function, and QTA and SA performances were compared regarding sensitivity to the choice of solution initializations, annealing schedules, and complexity of the dose-volume constraints. Finally, we investigated the extension from beamlet intensity optimization to direct aperture optimization (DAO). Influence matrices were calculated using the Eclipse scripting application program interface (API), and the optimizations were run on the University of Michigan's high-performance computing cluster, Flux.
RESULTS: Our results indicate that QTA's barrier-width function can be tuned to achieve faster convergence rates. The QTA algorithm reached convergence up to 46.6% faster than SA for beamlet intensity optimization and up to 26.8% faster for DAO. QTA and SA were ultimately found to be equally insensitive to the initialization process, but the convergence rate of QTA was found to be more sensitive to the complexity of the dose-volume constraints. The optimal smoothing technique was found to be a combination of a Laplace-of-Gaussian (LOG) edge-finding filter implemented as a penalty within the objective function and a two-dimensional Savitzky-Golay filter applied to the final iteration; this achieved total monitor units more than 20% smaller than plans optimized by commercial treatment planning software.
CONCLUSIONS: We have characterized the performance of a stochastic, quantum-inspired optimization algorithm, QTA, for radiotherapy treatment planning. This proof of concept study suggests that QTA can be tuned to achieve faster convergence than SA; therefore, QTA may be a good candidate for future knowledge-based or adaptive radiation therapy applications.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMRT; adaptive radiotherapy; quantum tunneling optimization; simulated annealing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31574176      PMCID: PMC6980234          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Theory of quantum annealing of an Ising spin glass.

Authors:  Giuseppe E Santoro; Roman Martonák; Erio Tosatti; Roberto Car
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm applied to random instances of an NP-complete problem.

Authors:  E Farhi; J Goldstone; S Gutmann; J Lapan; A Lundgren; D Preda
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Optimisation of conformal radiotherapy dose distributions by simulated annealing.

Authors:  S Webb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  IMRT: a review and preview.

Authors:  Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A multiobjective Bayesian networks approach for joint prediction of tumor local control and radiation pneumonitis in nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for response-adapted radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yi Luo; Daniel L McShan; Martha M Matuszak; Dipankar Ray; Theodore S Lawrence; Shruti Jolly; Feng-Ming Kong; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A fast inverse direct aperture optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Michael MacFarlane; Douglas A Hoover; Eugene Wong; Pedro Goldman; Jerry J Battista; Jeff Z Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Stephanie Lim-Reinders; Brian M Keller; Shahad Al-Ward; Arjun Sahgal; Anthony Kim
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Recent Developments in Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Deborah E Citrin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Deep reinforcement learning for automated radiation adaptation in lung cancer.

Authors:  Huan-Hsin Tseng; Yi Luo; Sunan Cui; Jen-Tzung Chien; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a review with a physics perspective.

Authors:  Byungchul Cho
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2018-03-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of beamlet width on dynamic IMRT plan quality in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Manya Wu; Jinhui Jin; Zhenghuan Li; Fantu Kong; Yadi He; Lijiang Liu; Wei Yang; Xiangying Xu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.061

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.