Literature DB >> 31574091

Correction: Feed Conversion, Survival and Development, and Composition of Four Insect Species on Diets Composed of Food By-Products.

Dennis G A B Oonincx, Sarah van Broekhoven, Arnold van Huis, Joop J A van Loon.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144601.].

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31574091      PMCID: PMC6772071          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


A misinterpretation of the fatty acid data led to the inclusion of C13:0 in the reported data throughout the article. The quantitative effect of this misinterpretation is limited. Please see the corrections below. There is an error in Table 2 and its caption. Please see the correct Table 2 and caption here
Table 2

Dry matter (DM)%, crude protein, phosphorus, and total fatty acid (TFA) percentages on a DM basis, and fatty acid composition (as % of total fatty acids*) of diets provided to Blaptica dubia (BD), Hermetia illucens (HI), Tenebrio molitor (TM), and Acheta domesticus (AD).

DietDM%ProteinPhosphorusTFAC 8:0C 10:0C 12:0C 14:0C 16:0C 16:1C 18:0C 18:1 t11C 18:1n9cC 18:2n6cC 18:3n3C 20:4n6C 23:0
Experimental diets
HPHF95.021.90.568.90.51.52.15.325.21.14.90.722.329.02.70.10.0
HPLF95.122.90.530.40.03.10.00.038.512.710.30.014.114.03.63.70.0
LPHF89.112.90.2214.01.12.54.09.122.91.47.60.731.310.80.80.10.0
LPLF89.114.40.211.50.00.00.01.215.50.54.21.332.437.56.00.00.0
Control diets
Tenebrio molitor 189.317.50.254.30.00.00.70.517.00.21.10.717.755.95.00.00.0
Tenebrio molitor 289.317.10.543.60.00.00.00.016.00.22.11.026.150.03.70.00.0
Acheta domesticus89.917.20.663.40.60.01.20.818.90.22.80.925.145.32.80.00.0
Hermetia illucens90.019.10.672.90.00.00.00.220.20.02.60.826.047.42.40.00.0
Blaptica dubia88.018.40.62.10.00.00.00.316.30.02.11.021.953.63.70.00.0
Carrot9.15.90.250.80.00.00.00.023.70.02.40.04.360.14.70.02.0

Experimental diet abbreviations: HPHF = high protein, high fat; HPLF = high protein, low fat; LPHF = low protein, high fat; LPLF = low protein, low fat.

* Fatty acids ≤ 1% of total fatty acids are excluded

Experimental diet abbreviations: HPHF = high protein, high fat; HPLF = high protein, low fat; LPHF = low protein, high fat; LPLF = low protein, low fat. * Fatty acids ≤ 1% of total fatty acids are excluded There is an error in Table 4 and its caption. Please see the correct Table 4 and caption here.
Table 4

Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), phosphorus (P) content, and total fatty acids (TFA), of Blaptica dubia, Hermetia illucens, Tenebrio molitor without and with carrot supplementation, and Acheta domesticus on different diets (Mean ± SD).

Different superscripts in a column, per species, denote significant differences (Kruskal Wallis followed by Scheffé’s posthoc test; P<0.05).

SpeciesDietDM, %FM CP, % DM P, g/kg DM TFA, % DM 
Blaptica dubia
HPHF32.7 ± 2.72ab60.7 ± 1.59a6.0 ± 0.16a19.0 ± 0.58ab
HPLF33.7 ± 1.53bc72.5 ± 1.25b5.8 ± 0.31a15.5 ± 1.81ab
LPHF38.5 ± 5.09c37.5 ± 0.99c4.7 ± 0.28b39.6 ± 2.69c
LPLF27.6 ± 1.71a53.9 ± 0.88d5.9 ± 0.08a19.9 ± 0.30b
Control31.6 ± 1.36ab69.8 ± 1.91b6.2 ± 0.45a14.6 ± 1.38a
Hermetia illucens
HPHF32.9 ± 1.8646.3 ± 0.93a8.5 ± 0.28ab24.1 ± 0.38
HPLF35.6 ± 2.4543.5 ± 3.00ab8.6 ± 0.90ab24.9 ± 3.80
LPHF35.1 ± 1.9738.8 ± 2.56b6.7 ± 1.34a27.4 ± 7.42
LPLF35.3 ± 2.3638.3 ± 1.41b6.4 ± 0.32a32.9 ± 3.17
Control33.9 ± 2.2843.8 ± 0.24ab9.7 ± 1.13b24.8 ± 3.99
Tenebrio molitor
HPHF41.5 ± 0.37a53.6 ± 0.45b8.9 ± 0.31ab25.9 ± 1.10ab
HPLF36.7 ± 3.65abc53.5 ± 1.25b8.8 ± 0.15ab22.3 ± 1.32a
LPHF37.2 ± 2.76abc44.4*8.8*26.0 ± 2.15ab
LPLF38.2 ± 2.85ab47.5 ± 1.26ab8.2 ± 0.06ab27.9 ± 0.71abc
Control139.8 ± 0.97ab52.4 ± 0.36b9.7 ± 0.26b26.4 ± 1.02ab
Control239.2 ± 1.27ab49.2 ± 1.01ab7.7 ± 0.40a30.3 ± 0.37bc
HPHF-C32.3 ± 2.90cd51.3 ± 1.09b8.3 ± 0.20ab22.0 ± 1.36a
HPLF-C35.1 ± 0.80bcd53.3 ± 1.13b8.4 ± 0.25ab23.0 ± 1.58a
LPHF-C34.8 ± 2.39bcd44.1 ± 4.86**a7.8 ± 1.70ab26.5 ± 0.99ab
LPLF-C30.2 ± 1.29d48.3 ± 0.00**ab7.9 ± 0.06ab24.2 ± 2.09ab
Control1-C35.0 ± 2.05bcd50.4 ± 1.94b9.2 ± 0.27ab24.2 ± 1.41ab
Control2-C36.0 ± 0.96abc47.8 ± 0.22ab7.9 ± 0.24ab33.9 ± 3.27c
Acheta domesticus
HPHF25.7 ± 2.6759.2 ± 5.57**8.5 ± 0.8620.2 ± 3.43
HPLF24.0*--18.7 ± 3.49
LPHF25.1 ± 5.24---
LPLF24.8 ± 0.98---
 Control24.1 ± 1.52 57.8 ± 2.78 8.9 ± 0.26 16.8 ± 1.61 

Experimental diet abbreviations: HPHF = high protein, high fat; HPLF = high protein, low fat; LPHF = low protein, high fat; LPLF = low protein, low fat, C indicates carrot supplementation. For DM% n = 6, for CP, P & TFA n = 3 unless indicated otherwise.—indicates insufficient sample

* n = 1

** n = 2.

Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), phosphorus (P) content, and total fatty acids (TFA), of Blaptica dubia, Hermetia illucens, Tenebrio molitor without and with carrot supplementation, and Acheta domesticus on different diets (Mean ± SD).

Different superscripts in a column, per species, denote significant differences (Kruskal Wallis followed by Scheffé’s posthoc test; P<0.05). Experimental diet abbreviations: HPHF = high protein, high fat; HPLF = high protein, low fat; LPHF = low protein, high fat; LPLF = low protein, low fat, C indicates carrot supplementation. For DM% n = 6, for CP, P & TFA n = 3 unless indicated otherwise.—indicates insufficient sample * n = 1 ** n = 2. There is an error in Table 6 and its caption. Please see the correct Table 6 and caption here.
Table 6

Fatty acid composition (% of total fatty acids*) of Blaptica dubia, Hermetia illucens, Tenebrio molitor without and with carrot supplementation, and Acheta domesticus, on different diets (Mean ± SD).

Different superscripts in a column, per species, denote significant differences (Kruskal Wallis followed by Scheffé’s posthoc test; P<0.05).

SpeciesDietC 10:0 C 12:0 C 14:0 Iso-C15:0 C 14:1 C 16:0 AI-C17:0 C 16:1 C 18:0 
Blaptica dubia
HPHF-0.4 ± 0.09b2.6 ± 0.21c0.1 ± 0.01bc0.1 ± 0.02b18.3 ± 1.07a1.0 ± 1.381.7 ± 1.44a6.7 ± 0.26b
HPLF-0.2 ± 0.04ab1.8 ± 0.13b0.0 ± 0.03a0.0 ± 0.04a22.5 ± 0.28b0.2 ± 0.029.0 ± 0.25b4.4 ± 0.05a
LPHF-0.6 ± 0.03c3.9 ± 0.08d0.1 ± 0.01c0.2 ± 0.02c22.5 ± 0.63b0.2 ± 0.008.1 ± 0.91b3.8 ± 0.32a
LPLF-0.2 ± 0.01a1.5 ± 0.09ab0.1 ± 0.01abc0.1 ± 0.02a21.5 ± 0.37b0.2 ± 0.017.9 ± 1.50b4.6 ± 0.63a
Control-0.2 ± 0.04a1.1 ± 0.08a0.1 ± 0.02ab0.0 ± 0.01a16.4 ± 0.85a0.3 ± 0.042.1 ± 0.09a8.0 ± 0.43c
Hermetia illucens
HPHF0.7 ± 0.09a29.7 ± 1.02a7.6 ± 0.16a0.0 ± 0.02a0.4 ± 0.01a17.4 ± 0.17b0.5 ± 0.06bc3.0 ± 0.22a2.9 ± 0.09
HPLF1.3 ± 0.07b49.6 ± 1.76bc9.7 ± 0.40b0.0 ± 0.01a1.0 ± 0.10c12.1 ± 0.83a0.1 ± 0.03a6.8 ± 0.95c2.1 ± 0.06
LPHF0.8 ± 0.08a39.3 ± 6.36ab7.9 ± 0.35a0.2 ± 0.02c0.7 ± 0.04b14.8 ± 1.88ab0.7 ± 0.22c3.4 ± 0.09ab2.4 ± 1.13
LPLF1.2 ± 0.04b51.6 ± 4.17c9.2 ± 0.16b0.0 ± 0.01a0.7 ± 0.03b11.8 ± 1.28a0.2 ± 0.01ab4.8 ± 0.53b1.8 ± 0.37
Control0.9 ± 0.15a47.7 ± 1.37bc9.5 ± 0.39b0.1 ± 0.02b0.3 ± 0.01a13.0 ± 0.98a0.2 ± 0.02ab3.5 ± 0.05ab2.1 ± 0.25
Tenebrio molitor
HPHF-0.3 ± 0.014.6 ± 0.08abcd0.1 ± 0.02ab-15.9 ± 0.33a1.1 ± 0.05ef2.0 ± 0.01bc3.2 ± 0.06a
HPLF-0.5 ± 0.255.0 ± 0.11bcd0.2 ± 0.04abc0.0 ± 0.01ab17.7 ± 0.27bcd1.1 ± 0.06ef3.0 ± 0.18d4.2 ± 0.38ab
LPHF-0.4 ± 0.065.7 ± 0.62d0.8 ± 0.10e0.1 ± 0.00c17.0 ± 0.47abcd1.2 ± 0.10f1.5 ± 0.06a4.1 ± 0.47ab
LPLF-0.3 ± 0.034.9 ± 0.33abcd0.4 ± 0.03cd-17.0 ± 0.29abcd1.0 ± 0.04cdef1.8 ± 0.11abc4.0 ± 0.02ab
Control1-0.4 ± 0.024.8 ± 0.12abcd0.1 ± 0.01ab-16.4 ± 0.38ab0.8 ± 0.05abcd1.9 ± 0.04abc3.6 ± 0.22ab
Control2-0.3 ± 0.034.5 ± 0.29abc0.5 ± 0.12d-15.6 ± 0.23a0.9 ± 0.11abcde2.1 ± 0.10c3.3 ± 0.28a
HPHF-C-0.4 ± 0.034.8 ± 0.24abcd0.1 ± 0.01a0.1 ± 0.00d20.8 ± 0.27e0.6 ± 0.05ab1.8 ± 0.04abc4.5 ± 0.13b
HPLF-C-0.3 ± 0.023.8 ± 0.02a0.2 ± 0.00ab0.0 ± 0.01ab18.3 ± 0.27d0.9 ± 0.02bcdef2.9 ± 0.04d4.1 ± 0.07ab
LPHF-C-0.4 ± 0.065.2 ± 0.44cd0.5 ± 0.01d-17.4 ± 0.60bcd1.1 ± 0.14def1.6 ± 0.19ab3.9 ± 0.34ab
LPLF-C-0.3 ± 0.004.0 ± 0.18ab0.3 ± 0.03bc0.0 ± 0.01a18.1 ± 0.19d0.8 ± 0.04abcd2.1 ± 0.16c3.8 ± 0.23ab
Control1-C-0.3 ± 0.023.7 ± 0.41a0.1 ± 0.04ab-17.8 ± 0.38cd0.6 ± 0.09a1.8 ± 0.07abc3.4 ± 0.35a
Control2-C-0.3 ± 0.054.3 ± 0.08abc0.2 ± 0.02abc0.0 ± 0.01a16.7 ± 0.17abc0.7 ± 0.03abc2.0 ± 0.07bc3.2 ± 0.06a
Acheta domesticus
HPHF-0.2 ± 0.052.5 ± 0.230.1 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.01b27.3 ± 0.77ab0.4 ± 0.041.6 ± 0.16ab6.5 ± 0.42
HPLF-0.1 ± 0.141.6 ± 1.490.0 ± 0.080.0 ± 0.04a27.7 ± 0.35b0.4 ± 0.192.1 ± 0.77b8.5 ± 2.15
 Control-0.1 ± 0.03 0.7 ± 0.03 - - 26.0 ± 0.34a0.3 ± 0.03 0.8 ± 0.09a8.1 ± 0.26 

Experimental diet abbreviations: HPHF = high protein, high fat; HPLF = high protein, low fat; LPHF = low protein, high fat; LPLF = low protein, low fat, C indicates carrot supplementation.—not detected, * Fatty acids ≤ 0.5% of total fatty acids are excluded

Fatty acid composition (% of total fatty acids*) of Blaptica dubia, Hermetia illucens, Tenebrio molitor without and with carrot supplementation, and Acheta domesticus, on different diets (Mean ± SD).

Different superscripts in a column, per species, denote significant differences (Kruskal Wallis followed by Scheffé’s posthoc test; P<0.05). Experimental diet abbreviations: HPHF = high protein, high fat; HPLF = high protein, low fat; LPHF = low protein, high fat; LPLF = low protein, low fat, C indicates carrot supplementation.—not detected, * Fatty acids ≤ 0.5% of total fatty acids are excluded Fig 1 and Fig 2 are incorrect. Please see the correct Fig 1 and Fig 2 here.
Fig 1

Total fatty acid and crude protein content as a percentage of dry matter of Argentinean cockroaches (A), Black soldier flies (B), Yellow mealworms without carrot (C), Yellow mealworms with carrot (D) and House crickets (E) reared on experimental (HPHF = high protein, high fat; HPLF = high protein, low fat; LPHF = low protein, high fat; LPLF = low protein, low fat), or control diets.

Fig 2

Average fatty acid composition (as a % of total fatty acids) of Argentinean cockroach, Black soldier fly, Yellow mealworm and House cricket reared on four experimental diets and their respective control diets.

Total fatty acid and crude protein content as a percentage of dry matter of Argentinean cockroaches (A), Black soldier flies (B), Yellow mealworms without carrot (C), Yellow mealworms with carrot (D) and House crickets (E) reared on experimental (HPHF = high protein, high fat; HPLF = high protein, low fat; LPHF = low protein, high fat; LPLF = low protein, low fat), or control diets. In the 3.1 Diet composition subsection of the Results and Discussion, there are errors in the third paragraph. The correct sentences are: The dietary fat composition varied between diets. The most prevalent fatty acids were palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1n9c), and linoleic acid (C18:2 n6c). The latter was especially abundant in control diets (45–60% of TFA). In the high fat diets, myristic acid (C14:0) was present in larger concentration (5–9% of TFA) than in the other diets (< 1%). In the 3.4 Insect body composition subsection of the Results and Discussion, there are errors in the fourth sentence of the fourth paragraph. The correct sentence is: TFA content was more variable (22–34% of DM) than crude protein and P content, which were similar on most diets. In the 3.4 Insect body composition subsection of the Results and Discussion, there are errors in the first sentence of the fifth paragraph. The correct sentence is: House crickets had a high crude protein (58–59% DM) and a low TFA content (17–20% DM) on the diets on which sufficient material for chemical analysis could be collected (the control and the high protein diets). In the 3.5 Fatty acids subsection of the Results and Discussion, there are errors in the second sentence of the first paragraph. The correct sentence is: Capric acid (C10:0) was detected only in black soldier flies (0.7–1.3% of TFA; Table 6). In the 3.5 Fatty acids subsection of the Results and Discussion, there are errors in the fourth sentence of the first paragraph. The correct sentence is: A small proportion of the house cricket fatty acids consisted of eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n3; ≤0.5% of TFA), and docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n3; ~0.1% of TFA). In the 3.5 Fatty acids subsection of the Results and Discussion, there is an error in the seventh sentence of the second paragraph. The correct sentence is: However, none of the insect-diet combinations resulted in a n6/n3 ratio < 5. In the 3.5 Fatty acids subsection of the Results and Discussion, there are errors in the second sentence of the third paragraph. The correct sentence is: The concentration of the latter fatty acid showed considerable variation due to dietary treatment (1.8–20.1% of TFA). In the 3.5 Fatty acids subsection of the Results and Discussion, there is an error in the second sentence of the third paragraph. The correct sentence is: The main fatty acid in this species was C18:2 n6, although C16:0 and C18:1n9 were also present in high concentrations. Together these made up ≥75% of TFA.
  1 in total

1.  Feed Conversion, Survival and Development, and Composition of Four Insect Species on Diets Composed of Food By-Products.

Authors:  Dennis G A B Oonincx; Sarah van Broekhoven; Arnold van Huis; Joop J A van Loon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  Effect of Feeding Rate on Growth Performance and Waste Reduction Efficiency of Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Diptera: Stratiomyidae).

Authors:  Moo Chee Yuan; Hadura Abu Hasan
Journal:  Trop Life Sci Res       Date:  2022-03-31

2.  Black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) as a high-potential agent for bioconversion of municipal primary sewage sludge.

Authors:  Silvia Arnone; Massimiliano De Mei; Francesco Petrazzuolo; Sergio Musmeci; Lorenzo Tonelli; Andrea Salvicchi; Francesco Defilippo; Michele Curatolo; Paolo Bonilauri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.190

3.  Modulating the Fatty Acid Profiles of Hermetia illucens Larvae Fats by Dietary Enrichment with Different Oilseeds: A Sustainable Way for Future Use in Feed and Food.

Authors:  Bogdan Georgescu; Anca Mihaela Boaru; Leon Muntean; Nicușor Sima; Dănuț Ioan Struți; Tudor Andrei Păpuc; Carmen Georgescu
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Antimicrobial Peptides from Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as Potential Antimicrobial Factors Representing an Alternative to Antibiotics in Livestock Farming.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Chaorong Ge; Huaiying Yao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.