Literature DB >> 31573857

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Distinguishes Malignancy in T1-Hyperintense Small Renal Masses.

Daniel R Ludwig1, David H Ballard1, Anup S Shetty1, Cary L Siegel1, Motoyo Yano1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Small renal masses (< 4 cm) can be difficult to accurately classify as benign or malignant, particularly when they appear T1 hyperintense on MRI. This intrinsic signal, potentially related to intralesional hemorrhage, may limit evaluation of signal intensity on DWI. The purpose of this study was to test whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements may distinguish malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This single-center retrospective study identified patients with a T1-hyperintense renal mass less than 4 cm on MRI. Malignant lesions were pathologically proven; a benign mass was established by a predefined hierarchy of pathologic proof, follow-up ultrasound, or follow-up imaging showing more than 5 years of stability. T1 hyperintensity, defined as a signal intensity equivalent to or greater than the adjacent renal cortex, was confirmed by a senior abdominal radiologist. Two additional abdominal radiologists independently measured ADC of the lesion, which was normalized to the ADC of the background ipsilateral kidney and represented as ADCratio. RESULTS. The final cohort included 58 benign and 37 malignant renal lesions in 95 patients. Interrater agreement for ADC measurements was almost perfect (κ = 0.836-0.934). ADCratio was significantly lower in malignant compared with benign lesions (0.65 ± 0.29 vs 1.03 ± 0.32; p < 0.001). Malignant lesions were significantly larger than benign lesions (2.66 ± 0.86 cm vs 1.50 ± 0.65 cm; p < 0.001); however, after controlling for lesion size, ADCratio remained a significant predictor of malignancy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. ADCratio was highly reproducible for T1-hyperintense small renal masses and was significantly lower in malignant compared with benign renal masses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DWI; MRI; hemorrhagic cyst; proteinaceous cyst; renal cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31573857      PMCID: PMC7005908          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.21907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  38 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of focal renal lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E A Lassel; R Rao; C Schwenke; S O Schoenberg; H J Michaely
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Visual Assessment of the Intensity and Pattern of T1 Hyperintensity on MRI to Differentiate Hemorrhagic Renal Cysts From Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Choo-Won Kim; Krishna P Shanbhogue; Jessica Schreiber-Zinaman; Fang-Ming Deng; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Differentiating papillary type I RCC from clear cell RCC and oncocytoma: application of whole-lesion volumetric ADC measurement.

Authors:  Anna K Paschall; S Mojdeh Mirmomen; Rolf Symons; Amir Pourmorteza; Rabindra Gautam; Amil Sahai; Andrew J Dwyer; Maria J Merino; Adam R Metwalli; W Marston Linehan; Ashkan A Malayeri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-09

4.  Differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes on CT and MRI.

Authors:  Nathan D Egbert; Elaine M Caoili; Richard H Cohan; Matthew S Davenport; Isaac R Francis; L Priya Kunju; James H Ellis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Morphologic subtyping of papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation with prognosis and differential expression of MUC1 between the two subtypes.

Authors:  Xavier Leroy; Laurent Zini; Emmanuelle Leteurtre; Farid Zerimech; Nicole Porchet; Jean-Pierre Aubert; Bernard Gosselin; Marie-Christine Copin
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Role of Virtual Biopsy in the Management of Renal Masses.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Matthew S Davenport; Stuart G Silverman; Nicola Schieda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  DWI for Renal Mass Characterization: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Performance.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; Angela Zhang; Pari V Pandharipande; Hersh Chandarana; R Scott Braithwaite; Benjamin Littenberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Renal masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging--a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Jingbo Zhang; Yousef Mazaheri Tehrani; Liang Wang; Nicole M Ishill; Larry H Schwartz; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hecht; Gary M Israel; Glenn A Krinsky; Winnie Y Hahn; Danny C Kim; Ilana Belitskaya-Levy; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Benign causes of diffusion restriction foci in the peripheral zone of the prostate: diagnosis and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Nirjhor M Bhowmik; Jinxing Yu; Ann S Fulcher; Mary A Turner
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.